CVE-2000-0553: Race Condition

Published May 26, 2000
·
Updated

Race condition in IPFilter firewall 3.4.3 and earlier, when configured with overlapping "return-rst" and "keep state" rules, allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions.

Affected Software

2 affected components
Darren Reed IPFilter=3.3.15
Darren Reed IPFilter=3.4.3

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Configuration

    Modify the IPFilter ruleset so that 'return-rst' rules do not overlap with 'keep state' rules. Remove, narrow, or reorder rules (addresses, masks, ports, or match criteria) so a given packet cannot match both a 'return-rst' and a 'keep state' rule; then apply the updated ruleset.

    Phildev IPFilter rule overlap: 'return-rst' vs 'keep state' = no-overlap / do not configure overlapping return-rst and keep state rules
  2. Operational

    Audit existing IPFilter configurations for overlapping 'return-rst' and 'keep state' rules, implement the configuration changes above, and verify that access restrictions behave as intended by testing blocked/allowed traffic. Record the changes and monitor logs for any signs of bypass.

Event History

May 26, 2000
CVE Published
04:00 AM
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:00 AM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Oct 13, 2000
CVE Published
via MITRE·08:00 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·08:00 AM
Description

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2000-0553?

CVE-2000-0553 is considered to have a high severity due to the potential for remote attackers to bypass access restrictions.

2

How do I fix CVE-2000-0553?

To fix CVE-2000-0553, you should upgrade to a version of IPFilter that does not contain this vulnerability, specifically versions later than 3.4.3.

3

What causes the vulnerability CVE-2000-0553?

CVE-2000-0553 is caused by a race condition in IPFilter when using conflicting "return-rst" and "keep state" rules.

4

Who is affected by CVE-2000-0553?

CVE-2000-0553 affects users of IPFilter versions 3.4.3 and earlier deployed in configurations with overlapping rules.

5

Can CVE-2000-0553 be exploited remotely?

Yes, CVE-2000-0553 can be exploited remotely, allowing attackers to bypass firewall access restrictions.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203