What is the severity of CVE-2000-0675?

The severity of CVE-2000-0675 is critical due to its potential to allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.

How do I fix CVE-2000-0675?

To fix CVE-2000-0675, upgrade Infopulse Gatekeeper to version 3.6 or later, which patches the vulnerability.

What versions of Infopulse Gatekeeper are affected by CVE-2000-0675?

Infopulse Gatekeeper versions 3.5 and earlier are affected by CVE-2000-0675.

What is the nature of the attack described in CVE-2000-0675?

CVE-2000-0675 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to send a long string to execute arbitrary commands.

Are there any workarounds for CVE-2000-0675?

There are no specific workarounds for CVE-2000-0675; the best approach is to upgrade the software to a fixed version.

Vulnerability/
CVE-2000-0675

high

7.5

CWE

NVD-CWE-Other 119

13/7/2000

13/10/2000

8/8/2024

CVE-2000-0675: Buffer Overflow

First published: Thu Jul 13 2000(Updated: )

Buffer overflow in Infopulse Gatekeeper 3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long string.

Credit: cve@mitre.org

Affected Software	Affected Version	How to fix
GNU Gatekeeper	<=3.5

Remedy

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1477

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Reference Links

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the severity of CVE-2000-0675?
The severity of CVE-2000-0675 is critical due to its potential to allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
How do I fix CVE-2000-0675?
To fix CVE-2000-0675, upgrade Infopulse Gatekeeper to version 3.6 or later, which patches the vulnerability.
What versions of Infopulse Gatekeeper are affected by CVE-2000-0675?
Infopulse Gatekeeper versions 3.5 and earlier are affected by CVE-2000-0675.
What is the nature of the attack described in CVE-2000-0675?
CVE-2000-0675 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to send a long string to execute arbitrary commands.
Are there any workarounds for CVE-2000-0675?
There are no specific workarounds for CVE-2000-0675; the best approach is to upgrade the software to a fixed version.

agent/references
agent/author
agent/type
agent/first-publish-date
agent/softwarecombine
collector/mitre-cve
source/MITRE
agent/remedy
agent/weakness
agent/severity
agent/last-modified-date
agent/description
agent/event
agent/source
agent/tags
collector/nvd-index
agent/software-canonical-lookup-request
collector/nvd-api
collector/nvd-historical
vendor/infopulse
canonical/gnu gatekeeper
version/gnu gatekeeper/3.5

Company

Resources

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co

By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the severity of CVE-2000-0675?
The severity of CVE-2000-0675 is critical due to its potential to allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
How do I fix CVE-2000-0675?
To fix CVE-2000-0675, upgrade Infopulse Gatekeeper to version 3.6 or later, which patches the vulnerability.
What versions of Infopulse Gatekeeper are affected by CVE-2000-0675?
Infopulse Gatekeeper versions 3.5 and earlier are affected by CVE-2000-0675.
What is the nature of the attack described in CVE-2000-0675?
CVE-2000-0675 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to send a long string to execute arbitrary commands.
Are there any workarounds for CVE-2000-0675?
There are no specific workarounds for CVE-2000-0675; the best approach is to upgrade the software to a fixed version.