First published: Tue May 30 2006(Updated: )
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Credit: secalert@redhat.com secalert@redhat.com
Affected Software | Affected Version | How to fix |
---|---|---|
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.6.1 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.8.0 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.8.1 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.4 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.7 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.7.0 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.6.0 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.3 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.7.1 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.4 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.2 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.5 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.1 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | =3.5.6 | |
Libtiff Libtiff | <=3.8.2 |
Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.