CWE
20
Advisory Published
CVE Published
CVE Published
Updated

CVE-2010-0097: Input Validation

First published: Tue Jan 12 2010(Updated: )

ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.

Credit: cret@cert.org

Affected SoftwareAffected VersionHow to fix
redhat/bind<30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
30:9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
BIND 9=9.6.1-p2
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc7
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc6
BIND 9=9.3.1-rc1
BIND 9=9.5.0-a6
BIND 9=9.1.1
BIND 9=9.4.3-b1
BIND 9=9.2.3-rc2
BIND 9=9.1.3
BIND 9=9.5.1-b2
BIND 9=9.4-r4
BIND 9=9.4.3-b2
BIND 9=9.4-r3
BIND 9=9.6-r6_rc1
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc1
BIND 9=9.1.3-rc3
BIND 9=9.4-r5
BIND 9=9.4.0-b2
BIND 9=9.3.5
BIND 9=9.2.0-b2
BIND 9=9.3.2-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.0-a3
BIND 9=9.2.3-rc4
BIND 9=9.5.0-p2_w1
BIND 9=9.2.8
BIND 9=9.2
BIND 9=9.3.0-rc4
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc8
BIND 9=9.2.1-rc1
BIND 9=9.3.0-rc2
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc2
BIND 9=9.5.0-a3
BIND 9=9.5
BIND 9=9.6.1
BIND 9=9.4.0-a4
BIND 9=9.3
BIND 9=9.3.4
BIND 9=9.3.0-b2
BIND 9=9.5.1-rc2
BIND 9=9.1.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.7-rc1
BIND 9=9.5.2
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.6-r3
BIND 9=9.2.5
BIND 9=9.3.2
BIND 9=9.4-r5-rc1
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc5
BIND 9=9.5.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.3-rc3
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc2
BIND 9=9.5.2-b1
BIND 9=9.5.0-p1
BIND 9=9.2.5-b2
BIND 9=9.3.6-rc1
BIND 9=9.3.6
BIND 9=9.2.2
BIND 9=9.4.3-p2
BIND 9=9.6.1-p1
BIND 9=9.4.1
BIND 9=9.6-r6_b1
BIND 9=9.4-r2
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc9
BIND 9=9.4
BIND 9=9.4.0-a3
BIND 9=9.5.0-a1
BIND 9=9.5.0-b1
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc3
BIND 9=9.5.1-b3
BIND 9=9.2.2-p2
BIND 9=9.5.2-p1
BIND 9=9.3.3-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc6
BIND 9=9.5.0-a7
BIND 9=9.3.0
BIND 9=9.4.0-rc2
BIND 9=9.3.0-b3
BIND 9=9.4-r5-p1
BIND 9=9.3.5-rc2
BIND 9=9.5.0-a2
BIND 9=9.4-b1
BIND 9=9.6.0-p1
BIND 9=9.5.0-a4
BIND 9=9.3.3-rc2
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc7
BIND 9=9.2.7-rc3
BIND 9=9.5.0-a5
BIND 9=9.1.3-rc2
BIND 9=9.7.0
BIND 9=9.5.0-p2_w2
BIND 9=9.6
BIND 9=9.6-r6
BIND 9=9.4-r5-b1
BIND 9=9.2.7
BIND 9=9.4
BIND 9=9.6-r9_p1
BIND 9=9.2.4
BIND 9=9.2.5-rc1
BIND 9=9.6-r5_b1
BIND 9=9.6-r2
BIND 9=9.2.1
BIND 9=9.1.2
BIND 9=9.5.0
BIND 9=9.6-r9
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc4
BIND 9=9.6-r1
BIND 9=9.6-r7_p2
BIND 9=9.4.2
BIND 9=9.4.0-a2
BIND 9=9.3.1
BIND 9=9.4.3-b3
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc4
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc3
BIND 9=9.1
BIND 9=9.6.1-b1
BIND 9=9.3.3-rc3
BIND 9=9.2.1-rc2
BIND 9=9.4.2-rc1
BIND 9=9.4.0-b4
BIND 9=9.4.0-b3
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc2
BIND 9=9.6-r6_rc2
BIND 9=9.2.2-p3
BIND 9=9.6-r7_p1
BIND 9=9.6.0-rc2
BIND 9=9.2.9-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.7-rc2
BIND 9=9.4.3
BIND 9=9.1.3-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.2-rc1
BIND 9=9.4-r4-p1
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc3
BIND 9=9.6-r5
BIND 9=9.5.0-p2
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc8
BIND 9=9.0.1-rc2
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc3
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc6
BIND 9=9.4.0-a1
BIND 9=9.6-r4_p1
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc5
BIND 9=9.3.5-rc1
BIND 9=9.3.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.4.0-a5
BIND 9=9.3.3
BIND 9=9.6-r7
BIND 9=9.6-r5_p1
BIND 9=9.5.0-b3
BIND 9=9.4-r1
BIND 9=9.3.0-b4
BIND 9=9.4.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.4.0
BIND 9=9.5.0-b2
BIND 9=9.3.0-rc3
BIND 9=9.2.3
BIND 9=9.6.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc6
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc10
BIND 9=9.2.0
BIND 9=9.2.9
BIND 9=9.5.1-b1
BIND 9=9.4.3-rc1
BIND 9=9.0.1
BIND 9=9.6.0-a1
BIND 9=9.4.0-a6
BIND 9=9.5.1-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.0-a2
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc2
BIND 9=9.4.0-b1
BIND 9=9.1.2-rc1
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc4
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc4
BIND 9=9.0
BIND 9=9.2.3-rc1
BIND 9=9.4.2-rc2
BIND 9=9.2.0-b1
BIND 9=9.6-r4
BIND 9=9.2.4-rc5
BIND 9=9.2.0-rc1
BIND 9=9.0.0-rc5
BIND 9=9.6.0-b1
BIND 9=9.2.6-rc1
BIND 9=9.0.1-rc1
BIND 9=9.3.1-b2
BIND 9=9.1.1-rc7
BIND 9=9.2.6
BIND 9=9.2.0-a1
BIND 9=9.5.1
BIND 9=9.6.0

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.

Reference Links

Parent vulnerabilities

(Appears in the following advisories)

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the severity of CVE-2010-0097?

    CVE-2010-0097 has been rated as high severity due to the potential for remote exploitation.

  • How do I fix CVE-2010-0097?

    To fix CVE-2010-0097, upgrade to a version of ISC BIND that is not vulnerable, such as 9.6.1-P3 or later.

  • What versions of ISC BIND are affected by CVE-2010-0097?

    ISC BIND versions from 9.0.x up to 9.5.2 and several release candidates are affected by CVE-2010-0097.

  • Can CVE-2010-0097 lead to denial of service attacks?

    While CVE-2010-0097 primarily allows for the addition of the AD flag to forged responses, it can facilitate denial of service scenarios indirectly.

  • What types of attacks could exploit CVE-2010-0097?

    CVE-2010-0097 could be exploited to achieve cache poisoning or facilitate man-in-the-middle attacks.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2025 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203