CVE-2010-0290: Medium severity ISC BIND vulnerability

Published Jan 20, 2010
·
Updated

The original fix for CVE-2009-4022 was found to be incomplete. BIND was incorrectly caching certain responses without performing proper DNSSEC validation. CNAME and DNAME records could be cached, without proper DNSSEC validation, when received from processing recursive client queries that requested DNSSEC records but indicated that checking should be disabled. A remote attacker could use this flaw to bypass the DNSSEC validation check and perform a cache poisoning attack if the target BIND server was receiving such client queries.

Other sources

Unspecified vulnerability in ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta, with DNSSEC validation enabled and checking disabled (CD), allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks by receiving a recursive client query and sending a response that contains (1) CNAME or (2) DNAME records, which do not have the intended validation before caching, aka Bug 20737. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-4022.

MITRE

Affected Software

168 affected components
ISC BIND=9.0
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc3
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc4
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc5
ISC BIND=9.0.0-rc6
ISC BIND=9.0.1
ISC BIND=9.0.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.0.1-rc2
ISC BIND=9.1
ISC BIND=9.1.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.1.1
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc2
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc3
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc4
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc5
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc6
ISC BIND=9.1.1-rc7
ISC BIND=9.1.2
ISC BIND=9.1.2-rc1
ISC BIND=9.1.3
ISC BIND=9.1.3-rc1
ISC BIND=9.1.3-rc2
ISC BIND=9.1.3-rc3
ISC BIND=9.2
ISC BIND=9.2.0
ISC BIND=9.2.0-a1
ISC BIND=9.2.0-a2
ISC BIND=9.2.0-a3
ISC BIND=9.2.0-b1
ISC BIND=9.2.0-b2
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc10
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc3
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc4
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc5
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc6
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc7
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc8
ISC BIND=9.2.0-rc9
ISC BIND=9.2.1
ISC BIND=9.2.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.1-rc2
ISC BIND=9.2.2
ISC BIND=9.2.2-p2
ISC BIND=9.2.2-p3
ISC BIND=9.2.2-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.3
ISC BIND=9.2.3-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.3-rc2
ISC BIND=9.2.3-rc3
ISC BIND=9.2.3-rc4
ISC BIND=9.2.4
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc2
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc3
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc4
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc5
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc6
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc7
ISC BIND=9.2.4-rc8
ISC BIND=9.2.5
ISC BIND=9.2.5-b2
ISC BIND=9.2.5-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.6
ISC BIND=9.2.6-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.7
ISC BIND=9.2.7-rc1
ISC BIND=9.2.7-rc2
ISC BIND=9.2.7-rc3
ISC BIND=9.2.8
ISC BIND=9.2.9
ISC BIND=9.2.9-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3
ISC BIND=9.3.0
ISC BIND=9.3.0-b2
ISC BIND=9.3.0-b3
ISC BIND=9.3.0-b4
ISC BIND=9.3.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.3.0-rc3
ISC BIND=9.3.0-rc4
ISC BIND=9.3.1
ISC BIND=9.3.1-b2
ISC BIND=9.3.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3.2
ISC BIND=9.3.2-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3.3
ISC BIND=9.3.3-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3.3-rc2
ISC BIND=9.3.3-rc3
ISC BIND=9.3.4
ISC BIND=9.3.5
ISC BIND=9.3.5-rc1
ISC BIND=9.3.5-rc2
ISC BIND=9.3.6
ISC BIND=9.3.6-rc1
ISC BIND=9.4
ISC BIND=9.4.0
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a1
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a2
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a3
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a4
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a5
ISC BIND=9.4.0-a6
ISC BIND=9.4.0-b1
ISC BIND=9.4.0-b2
ISC BIND=9.4.0-b3
ISC BIND=9.4.0-b4
ISC BIND=9.4.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.4.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.4.1
ISC BIND=9.4.2
ISC BIND=9.4.2-rc1
ISC BIND=9.4.2-rc2
ISC BIND=9.4.3
ISC BIND=9.4.3-b1
ISC BIND=9.4.3-b2
ISC BIND=9.4.3-b3
ISC BIND=9.4.3-p1
ISC BIND=9.4.3-p2
ISC BIND=9.4.3-p3
ISC BIND=9.4.3-p4
ISC BIND=9.4.3-p5
ISC BIND=9.4.3-rc1
ISC BIND=9.6.0
ISC BIND=9.6.0-a1
ISC BIND=9.6.0-b1
ISC BIND=9.6.0-p1
ISC BIND=9.6.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.6.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.6.1
ISC BIND=9.6.1-b1
ISC BIND=9.6.1-p1
ISC BIND=9.6.1-p2
ISC BIND=9.6.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.7.0-b1
ISC BIND=9.10.0
ISC BIND=9.10.0-a1
ISC BIND=9.10.0-a2
ISC BIND=9.10.0-b1
ISC BIND=9.10.0-b2
ISC BIND=9.10.0-p1
ISC BIND=9.10.0-p2
ISC BIND=9.10.0-rc1
ISC BIND=9.10.0-rc2
ISC BIND=9.10.1
ISC BIND=9.10.1-b1
ISC BIND=9.10.1-b2
ISC BIND=9.10.1-p1
ISC BIND=9.10.1-p2
ISC BIND=9.10.1-rc1
ISC BIND=9.10.1-rc2
ISC BIND=9.10.2-b1
ISC BIND=9.10.2-p1
ISC BIND=9.10.2-p2
ISC BIND=9.10.2-p3
ISC BIND=9.10.2-p4
ISC BIND=9.10.2-rc1
ISC BIND=9.10.2-rc2
ISC BIND=9.10.3
ISC BIND=9.10.3-b1
ISC BIND=9.10.3-p1
ISC BIND=9.10.3-p2
ISC BIND=9.10.3-p3
ISC BIND=9.10.3-rc1

Event History

Jan 20, 2010
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·02:05 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Jan 22, 2010
CVE Published
via MITRE·09:20 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·09:20 PM
Description
Data Sourced
via NVD·10:00 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2010-0290?

The severity of CVE-2010-0290 is considered high due to improper caching of DNS responses without DNSSEC validation.

2

How do I fix CVE-2010-0290?

To fix CVE-2010-0290, upgrade your BIND software to a version that includes the proper patches for this vulnerability.

3

Which versions are affected by CVE-2010-0290?

CVE-2010-0290 affects multiple versions of BIND 9, including from 9.0 to 9.10.x.

4

What is the impact of CVE-2010-0290?

The impact of CVE-2010-0290 includes potential cache poisoning and manipulation of DNS responses.

5

Is a workaround available for CVE-2010-0290?

A temporary workaround for CVE-2010-0290 might involve disabling DNSSEC or adjusting caching settings, but upgrading to a patched version is the recommended solution.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203