CVE-2011-0009: Medium severity best practical solutions request tracker vulnerability

Published Jan 24, 2011
·
Updated

Best Practical Solutions RT 3.x before 3.8.9rc2 and 4.x before 4.0.0rc4 uses the MD5 algorithm for password hashes, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine cleartext passwords via a brute-force attack on the database.

Other sources

It was found that Request Tracker, a ticket tracking and management system, stored user passwords in its database by using insufficiently secure hashing algorithm. A local attacker, able to gain read access to the RT's database could use this flaw to conduct brute force password guessing attacks, potentially leading to disclosure of users' passwords.

References: [1] http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610850 [3] http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2150

RT Development Snapshots archive URL: [4] http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/devel/

Red Hat

Affected Software

150 affected components
bestpractical RT=3.5.5
bestpractical RT=3.0.4
bestpractical RT=3.2.1-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.0-pre1
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.0.8
bestpractical RT=3.4.2-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.6.4-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.8.8-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.2.1-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.2.0-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.1.2
bestpractical RT=3.4.2-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.6-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.4.5
bestpractical RT=3.0.2
bestpractical RT=3.5.4
bestpractical RT=3.6.7
bestpractical RT=3.0.10-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.2
bestpractical RT=3.4.5-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.2.2
bestpractical RT=3.6.3
bestpractical RT=3.1.6
bestpractical RT=3.0.11
bestpractical RT=3.8.2
bestpractical RT=3.8.8-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.6.2-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.1.11
bestpractical RT=3.6.0-pre0
bestpractical RT=3.1.10
bestpractical RT=3.0.10-pre2
bestpractical RT=3.6.5-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.0
bestpractical RT=3.6.6-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.8.0
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc5
bestpractical RT=3.4.0
bestpractical RT=3.6.3-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.8.1-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.1.7
bestpractical RT=3.4.4-pre2
bestpractical RT=3.8.3-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.1.13
bestpractical RT=3.4.7-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.6.5-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.8.2-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.8.0-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.0.10
bestpractical RT=3.8.8-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.8.2-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.0.10-pre1
bestpractical RT=3.1.16
bestpractical RT=3.2.3
bestpractical RT=3.2.2-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.3-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.5.3
bestpractical RT=3.0.5
bestpractical RT=3.2.0
bestpractical RT=3.0.0
bestpractical RT=3.4.6
bestpractical RT=3.0.3
bestpractical RT=3.4.3
bestpractical RT=3.6.9
bestpractical RT=3.6.6
bestpractical RT=3.6.1-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.6.5
bestpractical RT=3.8.1-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.4.3-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc6
bestpractical RT=3.6.2-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.4.5-pre1
bestpractical RT=3.8.4-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.0.1
bestpractical RT=3.8.1-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.4.4-pre3
bestpractical RT=3.2.1
bestpractical RT=3.8.5
bestpractical RT=3.6.6-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.2.3-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.4.4
bestpractical RT=3.0.11-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.5.6
bestpractical RT=3.6.4-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.8
bestpractical RT=3.0.6
bestpractical RT=3.2.1-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.8.1-rc5
bestpractical RT=3.1.8
bestpractical RT=3.4.6-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.4.3-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.3-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.0-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.8.6-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.2.0-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.1.12
bestpractical RT=3.1.5
bestpractical RT=3.8.0-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.8.0-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.2.0-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.1.17
bestpractical RT=3.0.7
bestpractical RT=3.2.0-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.7.86
bestpractical RT=3.0.7.1
bestpractical RT=3.6.3-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.7.80
bestpractical RT=3.1.15
bestpractical RT=3.0.12
bestpractical RT=3.6.2-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.0.9
bestpractical RT=3.4.4-pre1
bestpractical RT=3.8.3
bestpractical RT<=3.8.9
bestpractical RT=3.7.1
bestpractical RT=3.1.3
bestpractical RT=3.6.1
bestpractical RT=3.4.0-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.4.1
bestpractical RT=3.4.5-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.2.3-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.8.6
bestpractical RT=3.6.4
bestpractical RT=3.5.7
bestpractical RT=3.6.0-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.8.1
bestpractical RT=3.8.4
bestpractical RT=3.7.5
bestpractical RT=3.8.1-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.7.85
bestpractical RT=3.6.1-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.8.3-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.6.2-rc5
bestpractical RT=3.4.6-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.6.1-pre2
bestpractical RT=3.0.11-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.2.1-rc4
bestpractical RT=3.5.2
bestpractical RT=3.6.0-rc2
bestpractical RT=3.1.4
bestpractical RT=3.0.11-rc3
bestpractical RT=3.8.7-rc1
bestpractical RT=3.1.14
bestpractical RT=3.4.2
bestpractical RT=3.5.1
bestpractical RT=4.0.0-rc3
bestpractical RT=4.0.0-rc2
bestpractical RT=4.0.0-rc1

Event History

Jan 24, 2011
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·03:35 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Jan 25, 2011
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:00 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:00 PM
Description

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2011-0009?

CVE-2011-0009 is considered a high severity vulnerability due to the use of the MD5 algorithm for password hashing, which can be exploited through brute-force attacks.

2

How do I fix CVE-2011-0009?

To fix CVE-2011-0009, upgrade to Request Tracker versions 3.8.9rc2 or 4.0.0rc4 or later, which use stronger password hashing algorithms.

3

What software versions are affected by CVE-2011-0009?

CVE-2011-0009 affects Best Practical Solutions RT versions before 3.8.9rc2 and 4.0.0rc4.

4

Who exploits CVE-2011-0009?

CVE-2011-0009 can be exploited by context-dependent attackers, who may gain access to user passwords via brute-force methods.

5

What impact does CVE-2011-0009 have on users?

The impact of CVE-2011-0009 may lead to unauthorized access to user accounts if attacker successfully determines cleartext passwords.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203