CVE-2011-1775: Input Validation

Published May 5, 2011
·
Updated

It was reported [1] that vncviewer could prompt for, and send, authentication credentials to a remote server without first properly validating the X.509 certificate. This could allow a malicious server to obtain a client's credentials because the client does not indicate to the user that a certificate is bad or missing.

A proposed patch [2] is being discussed.

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01342.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01347.html

Other sources

The CSecurityTLS::processMsg function in common/rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx in the vncviewer component in TigerVNC 1.1beta1 does not properly verify the server's X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a TLS VNC server via an arbitrary certificate.

MITRE

Affected Software

1 affected component
TigerVNC TigerVNC=1.1-beta1

Event History

May 5, 2011
Data Sourced
06:21 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
May 26, 2011
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:00 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:00 PM
Description
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2011-1775?

CVE-2011-1775 is categorized as a moderate severity vulnerability due to potential credential exposure.

2

How do I fix CVE-2011-1775?

To mitigate CVE-2011-1775, users should upgrade to a version of TigerVNC that addresses the certificate validation issue.

3

What does CVE-2011-1775 affect?

CVE-2011-1775 specifically affects TigerVNC version 1.1-beta1 due to improper certificate validation.

4

What is the main risk associated with CVE-2011-1775?

The main risk of CVE-2011-1775 is that a malicious server could obtain legitimate client authentication credentials.

5

Is CVE-2011-1775 still a risk today?

While CVE-2011-1775 may be less prevalent due to older software being outdated, it still poses a risk for legacy systems using vulnerable versions.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203