7.5
CWE
120 119
Advisory Published
CVE Published
Updated

CVE-2015-8472: Buffer Overflow

First published: Thu Nov 12 2015(Updated: )

Buffer overflow in the png_set_PLTE function in libpng before 1.0.65, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.55, 1.3.x, 1.4.x before 1.4.18, 1.5.x before 1.5.25, and 1.6.x before 1.6.20 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-8126.

Credit: cve@mitre.org

Affected SoftwareAffected VersionHow to fix
redhat/java<1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.1.el5_11
1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.1.el5_11
redhat/java<1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.3.el5_11
1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.3.el5_11
redhat/java<1.8.0-oracle-1:1.8.0.71-1jpp.1.el6_7
1.8.0-oracle-1:1.8.0.71-1jpp.1.el6_7
redhat/java<1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.1.el6_7
1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.1.el6_7
redhat/java<1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.3.el6_7
1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.3.el6_7
redhat/java<1.8.0-oracle-1:1.8.0.71-1jpp.1.el7
1.8.0-oracle-1:1.8.0.71-1jpp.1.el7
redhat/java<1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.2.el7
1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.95-1jpp.2.el7
redhat/java<1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.1.el7
1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.111-1jpp.1.el7
redhat/java<1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.9.30-1jpp.1.el5
1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.9.30-1jpp.1.el5
redhat/java<1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.20-1jpp.1.el5
1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.20-1jpp.1.el5
redhat/libpng<2:1.2.49-2.el6_7
2:1.2.49-2.el6_7
redhat/java<1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.30-1jpp.2.el6_7
1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.30-1jpp.2.el6_7
redhat/java<1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.20-1jpp.1.el6_7
1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.20-1jpp.1.el6_7
redhat/libpng12<0:1.2.50-7.el7_2
0:1.2.50-7.el7_2
redhat/libpng<2:1.5.13-7.el7_2
2:1.5.13-7.el7_2
redhat/java<1.8.0-ibm-1:1.8.0.2.10-1jpp.1.el7
1.8.0-ibm-1:1.8.0.2.10-1jpp.1.el7
redhat/java<1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.30-1jpp.1.el7
1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.30-1jpp.1.el7
redhat/java<1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.9.40-1jpp.1.el5
1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.9.40-1jpp.1.el5
redhat/java<1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.40-1jpp.1.el6_7
1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.3.40-1jpp.1.el6_7
redhat/spacewalk-java<0:2.0.2-109.el6
0:2.0.2-109.el6
redhat/spacewalk-java<0:2.3.8-146.el6
0:2.3.8-146.el6
Apple iOS and macOS<=10.11.3
libp2p=1.0.64
libp2p=1.2.0
libp2p=1.2.1
libp2p=1.2.2
libp2p=1.2.3
libp2p=1.2.4
libp2p=1.2.10
libp2p=1.2.11
libp2p=1.2.12
libp2p=1.2.13
libp2p=1.2.14
libp2p=1.2.15
libp2p=1.2.16
libp2p=1.2.17
libp2p=1.2.18
libp2p=1.2.19
libp2p=1.2.20
libp2p=1.2.21
libp2p=1.2.22
libp2p=1.2.23
libp2p=1.2.24
libp2p=1.2.25
libp2p=1.2.26
libp2p=1.2.27
libp2p=1.2.28
libp2p=1.2.29
libp2p=1.2.30
libp2p=1.2.31
libp2p=1.2.32
libp2p=1.2.33
libp2p=1.2.34
libp2p=1.2.35
libp2p=1.2.36
libp2p=1.2.37
libp2p=1.2.38
libp2p=1.2.39
libp2p=1.2.40
libp2p=1.2.41
libp2p=1.2.42
libp2p=1.2.43
libp2p=1.2.44
libp2p=1.2.45
libp2p=1.2.46
libp2p=1.2.47
libp2p=1.2.48
libp2p=1.2.49
libp2p=1.2.50
libp2p=1.2.51
libp2p=1.2.52
libp2p=1.2.53
libp2p=1.2.54
libp2p=1.4.0
libp2p=1.4.1
libp2p=1.4.2
libp2p=1.4.3
libp2p=1.4.4
libp2p=1.4.5
libp2p=1.4.6
libp2p=1.4.7
libp2p=1.4.8
libp2p=1.4.9
libp2p=1.4.10
libp2p=1.4.11
libp2p=1.4.12
libp2p=1.4.13
libp2p=1.4.14
libp2p=1.4.15
libp2p=1.4.16
libp2p=1.4.17
libp2p=1.5.1
libp2p=1.5.2
libp2p=1.5.3
libp2p=1.5.4
libp2p=1.5.5
libp2p=1.5.6
libp2p=1.5.7
libp2p=1.5.8
libp2p=1.5.9
libp2p=1.5.10
libp2p=1.5.11
libp2p=1.5.12
libp2p=1.5.13
libp2p=1.5.14
libp2p=1.5.15
libp2p=1.5.16
libp2p=1.5.17
libp2p=1.5.18
libp2p=1.5.19
libp2p=1.5.20
libp2p=1.5.21
libp2p=1.5.22
libp2p=1.5.23
libp2p=1.5.24
libp2p=1.6.0
libp2p=1.6.1
libp2p=1.6.2
libp2p=1.6.3
libp2p=1.6.4
libp2p=1.6.5
libp2p=1.6.6
libp2p=1.6.7
libp2p=1.6.8
libp2p=1.6.9
libp2p=1.6.10
libp2p=1.6.11
libp2p=1.6.12
libp2p=1.6.13
libp2p=1.6.14
libp2p=1.6.15
libp2p=1.6.16
libp2p=1.6.17
libp2p=1.6.18
libp2p=1.6.19

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.

Reference Links

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the severity of CVE-2015-8472?

    CVE-2015-8472 has a severity rating of moderate due to its potential to cause application crashes and denial of service.

  • What types of attacks can exploit CVE-2015-8472?

    CVE-2015-8472 can be exploited by remote attackers to trigger a buffer overflow, leading to application crashes or other unspecified impacts.

  • How do I fix CVE-2015-8472?

    To fix CVE-2015-8472, upgrade to a version of libpng that is patched, specifically to version 1.0.65 or later, 1.2.55 or later, or the appropriate version listed by your software vendor.

  • Which software versions are affected by CVE-2015-8472?

    CVE-2015-8472 affects various versions of libpng prior to 1.0.65, 1.1.x, 1.2.x before 1.2.55, and several other versions detailed in the vulnerability report.

  • What are the potential impacts of CVE-2015-8472?

    The potential impacts of CVE-2015-8472 include application crashes and denial of service, which can affect the availability of services relying on the vulnerable software.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2025 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203