CVE-2016-2866: Infoleak
Published Feb 8, 2017
·Updated
An unspecified vulnerability in IBM Jazz Team Server may disclose some deployment information to an authenticated user.
Affected Software
15 affected components
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.0
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.1
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.2
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.3
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.4
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.5
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.6
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=4.0.7
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=5.0.0
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=5.0.1
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=5.0.2
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=6.0.0
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=6.0.1
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=6.0.2
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management=6.0.3
Remediation
Patch Available
Event History
Feb 8, 2017
CVE Published
via MITRE·07:00 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·07:00 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·07:59 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Frequently Asked Questions
1
What is the severity of CVE-2016-2866?
CVE-2016-2866 has a moderate severity level, as it may expose sensitive deployment information to authenticated users.
2
How do I fix CVE-2016-2866?
To mitigate CVE-2016-2866, it is recommended to apply the latest patches provided by IBM for the affected versions of IBM Jazz Team Server.
3
Which versions are affected by CVE-2016-2866?
CVE-2016-2866 affects IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management versions 4.0.0 through 6.0.3.
4
Who is impacted by the CVE-2016-2866 vulnerability?
Authenticated users with access to IBM Jazz Team Server are at risk of being impacted by CVE-2016-2866.
5
Is there a workaround for CVE-2016-2866?
Currently, applying the recommended patches is the primary method to address CVE-2016-2866, and no specific workaround is available.