7.5
CWE
444
Advisory Published
CVE Published
Advisory Published
Updated

CVE-2019-16785: HTTP Request Smuggling: LF vs CRLF handling in Waitress

First published: Fri Dec 20 2019(Updated: )

### Impact Waitress implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.5) which states: Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR. Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. Example: ``` Content-Length: 100[CRLF] X-Header: x[LF]Content-Length: 0[CRLF] ``` Would get treated by Waitress as if it were: ``` Content-Length: 100 X-Header: x Content-Length: 0 ``` This could potentially get used by attackers to split the HTTP request and smuggle a second request in the body of the first. ### Patches This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. This brings a range of changes to harden Waitress against potential HTTP request confusions, and may change the behaviour of Waitress behind non-conformist proxies. Waitress no longer implements the MAY part of the specification and instead requires that all lines are terminated correctly with CRLF. If any lines are found with a bare CR or LF a 400 Bad Request is sent back to the requesting entity. The Pylons Project recommends upgrading as soon as possible, while validating that the changes in Waitress don't cause any changes in behavior. ### Workarounds Various reverse proxies may have protections against sending potentially bad HTTP requests to the backend, and or hardening against potential issues like this. If the reverse proxy doesn't use HTTP/1.1 for connecting to the backend issues are also somewhat mitigated, as HTTP pipelining does not exist in HTTP/1.0 and Waitress will close the connection after every single request (unless the Keep Alive header is explicitly sent... so this is not a fool proof security method) ### Issues/more security issues: * open an issue at https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/issues (if not sensitive or security related) * email the Pylons Security mailing list: pylons-project-security@googlegroups.com (if security related)

Credit: security-advisories@github.com security-advisories@github.com

Affected SoftwareAffected VersionHow to fix
pip/waitress<1.4.0
1.4.0
Agendaless Waitress<=1.3.1
Oracle Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment=1.10.0
Debian Debian Linux=9.0
Fedoraproject Fedora=30
Fedoraproject Fedora=31
Redhat Openstack=15
redhat/python-waitress<0:1.4.2-1.el8
0:1.4.2-1.el8
debian/waitress
1.2.0~b2-2+deb10u1
1.4.4-1.1+deb11u1
2.1.2-2

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.

Reference Links

Parent vulnerabilities

(Appears in the following advisories)

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is CVE-2019-16785?

    CVE-2019-16785 is a vulnerability in Waitress through version 1.3.1 that allows a recipient to recognize a single LF as a line terminator in violation of RFC7230.

  • What is the impact of CVE-2019-16785?

    The impact of CVE-2019-16785 is that a recipient may accept a single LF as a line terminator instead of the required CRLF, potentially leading to HTTP response splitting or header injection attacks.

  • How can I fix CVE-2019-16785?

    To fix CVE-2019-16785, upgrade to Waitress version 1.4.0 or higher.

  • Where can I find more information about CVE-2019-16785?

    You can find more information about CVE-2019-16785 at the following references: [GitHub Advisory](https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-pg36-wpm5-g57p), [NVD](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16785), and [GitHub Commit](https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/commit/8eba394ad75deaf9e5cd15b78a3d16b12e6b0eba).

  • What is the severity of CVE-2019-16785?

    The severity of CVE-2019-16785 is high, with a CVSS score of 7.1.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2024 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203