CVE-2022-31109: HTTP Host Header Attack Vulnerability in laminas-diactoros

Published Jul 25, 2022
·
Updated

Impact

Applications that use Diactoros, and are either not behind a proxy, or can be accessed via untrusted proxies, can potentially have the host, protocol, and/or port of a Laminas\Diactoros\Uri instance associated with the incoming server request modified to reflect values from X-Forwarded- headers. Such changes can potentially lead to XSS attacks (if a fully-qualified URL is used in links) and/or URL poisoning.

Patches

Any version after 2.11.0.

Starting in laminas/laminas-diactoros 2.11.1, we have added Laminas\Diactoros\ServerRequestFilter\FilterServerRequestInterface, which defines the single method invoke(Psr\Http\Message\ServerRequestInterface $request): Psr\Http\Message\ServerRequestInterface. Filters implementing this interface allow modifying and returning a generated ServerRequest.

The primary use case of the interface is to allow modifying the generated URI based on the presence of headers such as X-Forwarded-Host. When operating behind a reverse proxy, the Host header is often rewritten to the name of the node to which the request is being forwarded, and an X-Forwarded-Host header is generated with the original Host value to allow the server to determine the original host the request was intended for. (We have always examined the X-Forwarded-Proto header; as of Diactoros 2.11.1, we also examine the X-Forwarded-Port header.) To accommodate this use case, we created Laminas\Diactoros\ServerRequestFilter\FilterUsingXForwardedHeaders.

Due to potential security issues, it is generally best to only accept these headers if you trust the reverse proxy that has initiated the request. (This value is found in $SERVER['REMOTEADDR'], which is present as $request->getServerParams()['REMOTEADDR'] within PSR-7 implementations.) FilterUsingXForwardedHeaders provides named constructors to allow you to trust these headers from any source (which has been the default behavior of Diactoros since the beginning), or to specify specific IP addresses or CIDR subnets to trust, along with which headers are trusted.

Laminas\Diactoros\ServerRequestFactory::fromGlobals() was updated to accept a FilterServerRequestInterface as an additional, optional argument. Since the X-Forwarded- headers do have valid use cases, particularly in clustered environments using a load balancer, to prevent backwards compatibility breaks, if no filter is provided, we generate an instance via FilterUsingXForwardedHeaders::trustReservedSubnets(), which generates an instance marked to trust only proxies on private subnets.

Workarounds

Infrastructure or DevOps can configure web servers to reject X-Forwarded- headers at the web server level.

Users of laminas/laminas-diactoros can make use of the Laminas\Diactoros\RequestFilter\RequestFilterInterface functionality in order to either (a) disable usage of the X-Forwarded- headers entirely, (b) opt-in to it, or (c) opt-in to the usage for configured proxy servers.

References

- HTTP Host Header Attacks

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

- Open an issue in laminas/laminas-diactoros - Email us

Other sources

Diactoros before 2.11.1 vulnerable to HTTP Host Header Attack.

laminas-diactoros is a PHP package containing implementations of the PSR-7 HTTP message interfaces and PSR-17 HTTP message factory interfaces. Applications that use Diactoros, and are either not behind a proxy, or can be accessed via untrusted proxies, can potentially have the host, protocol, and/or port of a Laminas\Diactoros\Uri instance associated with the incoming server request modified to reflect values from X-Forwarded- headers. Such changes can potentially lead to XSS attacks (if a fully-qualified URL is used in links) and/or URL poisoning. Since the X-Forwarded- headers do have valid use cases, particularly in clustered environments using a load balancer, the library offers mitigation measures only in the v2 releases, as doing otherwise would break these use cases immediately. Users of v2 releases from 2.11.1 can provide an additional argument to Laminas\Diactoros\ServerRequestFactory::fromGlobals() in the form of a Laminas\Diactoros\RequestFilter\RequestFilterInterface instance, including the shipped Laminas\Diactoros\RequestFilter\NoOpRequestFilter implementation which ignores the X-Forwarded- headers. Starting in version 3.0, the library will reverse behavior to use the NoOpRequestFilter by default, and require users to opt-in to X-Forwarded- header usage via a configured Laminas\Diactoros\RequestFilter\LegacyXForwardedHeaderFilter instance. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.11.1 or later to resolve this issue. Users unable to upgrade may configure web servers to reject X-Forwarded- headers at the web server level.

Affected Software

3 affected componentsFixes available
composer/laminas/laminas-diactoros<2.11.1
composer/laminas/laminas-diactoros<2.11.1
2.11.1
getlaminas laminas-diactoros<2.11.1

Event History

Jul 25, 2022
Advisory Published
07:29 PM
Aug 1, 2022
CVE Published
via MITRE·04:15 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·04:15 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the impact of CVE-2022-31109?

Applications that use Diactoros, and are either not behind a proxy, or can be accessed via untrusted proxies, can potentially have the host, protocol, and/or port of a `Laminas\Diactoros\Uri` instance associated with the incoming server request modified to reflect values from `X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Forwarded-Proto`, or `X-Forwarded-Port` headers.

2

What is the severity of CVE-2022-31109?

The severity of CVE-2022-31109 is high with a CVSS score of 6.1.

3

How can I fix CVE-2022-31109?

To fix CVE-2022-31109, upgrade to version 2.11.1 of Diactoros or a higher and secure version.

4

Where can I find more information about CVE-2022-31109?

You can find more information about CVE-2022-31109 at the following references: [GitHub Advisory](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8274-h5jp-97vr), [GitHub Security Advisories](https://github.com/laminas/laminas-diactoros/security/advisories/GHSA-8274-h5jp-97vr), [GitHub Commit](https://github.com/laminas/laminas-diactoros/commit/25b11d422c2e5dad868f68619888763b30f91e2d).

5

What are the Common Weakness Enumerations (CWE) associated with CVE-2022-31109?

The Common Weakness Enumerations (CWE) associated with CVE-2022-31109 are CWE-79 (Cross-Site Scripting) and CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling')).

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203