CVE-2024-22194: cdo-local-uuid vulnerable to insertion of artifact derived from developer's Present Working Directory into demonstration code
Impact What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
An information leakage vulnerability is present in cdo-local-uuid at version 0.4.0, and in case-utils in unpatched versions (matching the pattern 0.x.0) at and since 0.5.0, before 0.15.0.
The vulnerability stems from a Python function, cdolocaluuid.localuuid(), and its original implementation caseutils.localuuid(). Henceforth, both will be called localuuid().
localuuid() generates UUIDv5s using a deterministic pseudorandom number stream. This was written to make graph application demonstrations generate consistent, version-controllable output with minimal noise caused by demonstration re-runs. Part of the information used to keep individual examples' generated output distinct from one another is seed information from the caller's environment, particularly the program's argument vector. The present working directory is also included as part of the seed information, but for reasons including maintaining user environment privacy, as well as keeping generated identifiers consistent regardless of where a source tree is housed on a user's file system, the present working directory is trimmed from the left to exclude path information outside of a supplied "Top" source directory. (In context of the Make scripting language, this "top" directory is typically in a variable called topsrcdir. In context of Git-based project management, this directory is expected to be the root directory of a freshly "Cloned" project, e.g., where .git is stored.)
Under certain conditions, a user's present working directory, as an absolute path, was incorporated into seed data for the localuuid() deterministic pseudorandom number stream. This violates an expectation made in the documented purpose of the localuuid() function, and leaks information about a calling user's environment.
The conditions are:
Given a project with top source directory topsrcdir, for instance /home/user1/Documents/Project1; Given a Python script housed directly in topsrcdir, for instance at ${topsrcdir}/example.py, written to support the deterministic mode of localuuid(); Given a call to that Python script that follows the documentation for localuuid();
The absolute path for topsrcdir was then included in the seed information for the UUIDv5 stream, when what was intended was a relative path spelling. That is, instead of ./example.py being in the seed data, /home/user1/Documents/Project1/example.py was in the seed data.
This does not leak the present working directory directly. But, given other knowledge of how a program had been called to generate data using localuuid() under these conditions, it becomes possible to determine that a chosen path can lead to a known UUIDv5 value. Note that it is not necessarily knowable that the chosen path is the only solution to a sequence reconstruction; but, the path can be confirmed to be a solution.
Patches Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
The issue has been patched, in the cdo-local-uuid source repository and the case-utils source repository.
Users should upgrade to any of these versions minimally:
case-utils == 0.5.1 case-utils == 0.6.1 case-utils == 0.7.1 case-utils == 0.8.1 case-utils == 0.9.1 case-utils == 0.10.1 case-utils == 0.11.1 case-utils == 0.12.1 case-utils == 0.13.1 case-utils == 0.14.1 case-utils >= 0.15.0 cdo-local-uuid == 0.5.0
All case-utils releases that contain the patch have the commit ea630cce66b26dae6d7fa7e02451d6e25456a5f2 in their Git history. Anyone interested in confirming the presence of this commit in a certain branch or tag can run the following test (written in Bash), substituting the desired branch name for the assigned value of mygitrefofinterest:
bash #!/bin/bash Present working directory ($PWD) should be in a clone of this repository: https://github.com/casework/CASE-Utilities-Python mygitrefofinterest=main test \ "xea630cce66b26dae6d7fa7e02451d6e25456a5f2" \ == \ "x$(git merge-base ea630cc ${mygitrefofinterest})" echo $? # Should print '0'
Note that other releases have been posted atop some of those minimal versions recommended for upgrading, named, e.g., 0.5.1.post0. These releases were posted to update internal library version numbers, and otherwise contain no functional changes, in accordance with Python Packaging guidance:
https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/version-specifiers/#post-release-separators
Workarounds Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
If the script calling cdolocaluuid.localuuid() is moved out of the "Top" source directory, the issue is addressed.
References Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
The issue is addressed in this Pull Request:
https://github.com/Cyber-Domain-Ontology/CDO-Utility-Local-UUID/pull/3
Tests to reproduce the issue's conditions and confirm it has been addressed are in this Pull Requested:
https://github.com/Cyber-Domain-Ontology/CDO-Utility-Local-UUID/pull/4
<!-- CVSS3.1 vector determined by rubric diagrams at this page: https://www.first.org/cvss/v3.1/user-guide -->
Other sources
cdo-local-uuid project provides a specialized UUID-generating function that can, on user request, cause a program to generate deterministic UUIDs. An information leakage vulnerability is present in cdo-local-uuid at version 0.4.0, and in case-utils in unpatched versions (matching the pattern 0.x.0) at and since 0.5.0, before 0.15.0. The vulnerability stems from a Python function, cdolocaluuid.localuuid(), and its original implementation caseutils.localuuid().
— NVD
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.14.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.13.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.12.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.11.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.10.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.9.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.8.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.7.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.6.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.5.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/cdo-local-uuidto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.5.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
cdo-local-uuidto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.5.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
case-utilsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.15.0 - Configuration
Address the issue by ensuring the script calling cdo_local_uuid.local_uuid() is moved/organized so that the vulnerable absolute-path inclusion does not occur: the text states that if the script calling cdo_local_uuid.local_uuid() is moved out of the "Top" source directory, the issue is addressed, and also describes trimming the present working directory from the left to exclude path information outside of the supplied top_srcdir for deterministic UUID seed data.
local_uuid() usage top_srcdir-relative path handling = Trim present working directory from seed information outside of the supplied Top source directory
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2024-22194?
CVE-2024-22194 is classified as an information leakage vulnerability.
Who is impacted by CVE-2024-22194?
CVE-2024-22194 affects users of cdo-local-uuid version 0.4.0 and unpatched versions of case-utils.
How do I fix CVE-2024-22194?
To fix CVE-2024-22194, upgrade case-utils to version 0.14.1 or later, or cdo-local-uuid to version 0.5.0 or later.
What is the nature of the vulnerability in CVE-2024-22194?
CVE-2024-22194 is an information leakage vulnerability that may expose sensitive data.
Are there any known exploits for CVE-2024-22194?
As of now, there are no publicly available exploits for CVE-2024-22194.