CVE-2024-32646: vyper performs double eval of the slice args when buffer from adhoc locations
Summary Using the slice builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either msg.data, self.code or <address>.code and either the start or length arguments have side-effects.
A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. Having side-effects in the start and length patterns is also an unusual pattern which is not that likely to show up in user code. It is also much harder (but not impossible!) to trigger the bug since 0.3.4 since the unique symbol fence was introduced (https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914).
Details It can be seen that the buildadhocslicenode function of the slice builtin doesn't cache the mentioned arguments to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/4595938734d9988f8e46e8df38049ae0559abedb/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L244
As such, they can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack).
PoC with Vyper version 0.3.3+commit.48e326f the call to foo passes the asserts: vyper l: DynArray[uint256, 10]
@external def foo(cs: String[64]) -> uint256: for i in range(10): self.l.append(1) assert len(self.l) == 10 s: Bytes[64] = b"" s = slice(msg.data, self.l.pop(), 3) assert len(self.l) == 10 - 2 return len(self.l)
Patches Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3976.
Impact No vulnerable production contracts were found.
Other sources
Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the slice builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either msg.data, self.code or <address>.code and either the start or length arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions <0.3.4 as 0.3.4 introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2024-32646?
CVE-2024-32646 has a high severity due to the potential for a double eval vulnerability.
How do I fix CVE-2024-32646?
To fix CVE-2024-32646, upgrade to a version of Vyper greater than 0.4.0.
What software is affected by CVE-2024-32646?
CVE-2024-32646 affects Vyper versions up to 0.4.0.
What impact does CVE-2024-32646 have on applications?
CVE-2024-32646 can lead to unintended code execution vulnerabilities in applications using the affected software.
Are there any known exploits for CVE-2024-32646?
As of now, there are no publicly available exploits for CVE-2024-32646.