CVE-2024-50002: static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module()

Published Oct 21, 2024
·
Updated

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

staticcall: Handle module init failure correctly in staticcalldelmodule()

Module insertion invokes staticcalladdmodule() to initialize the static calls in a module. staticcalladdmodule() invokes staticcallinit(), which allocates a struct staticcallmod to either encapsulate the built-in static call sites of the associated key into it so further modules can be added or to append the module to the module chain.

If that allocation fails the function returns with an error code and the module core invokes staticcalldelmodule() to clean up eventually added staticcallmod entries.

This works correctly, when all keys used by the module were converted over to a module chain before the failure. If not then staticcalldelmodule() causes a #GP as it blindly assumes that key::mods points to a valid struct staticcallmod.

The problem is that key::mods is not a individual struct member of struct staticcallkey, it's part of a union to save space:

union { / bit 0: 0 = mods, 1 = sites / unsigned long type; struct staticcallmod mods; struct staticcallsite sites; };

key::sites is a pointer to the list of built-in usage sites of the static call. The type of the pointer is differentiated by bit 0. A mods pointer has the bit clear, the sites pointer has the bit set.

As staticcalldelmodule() blidly assumes that the pointer is a valid staticcallmod type, it fails to check for this failure case and dereferences the pointer to the list of built-in call sites, which is obviously bogus.

Cure it by checking whether the key has a sites or a mods pointer.

If it's a sites pointer then the key is not to be touched. As the sites are walked in the same order as in staticcallinit() the site walk can be terminated because all subsequent sites have not been touched by the init code due to the error exit.

If it was converted before the allocation fail, then the inner loop which searches for a module match will find nothing.

A fail in the second allocation in staticcallinit() is harmless and does not require special treatment. The first allocation succeeded and converted the key to a module chain. That first entry has mod::mod == NULL and mod::next == NULL, so the inner loop of staticcalldelmodule() will neither find a module match nor a module chain. The next site in the walk was either already converted, but can't match the module, or it will exit the outer loop because it has a staticcallsite pointer and not a staticcallmod pointer.

Other sources

This CVE was automatically created from a reference found in an email or other text. If you are reading this, then this CVE entry is probably erroneous, since this text should be replaced by the official CVE description automatically.

Launchpad

Affected Software

12 affected componentsFixes available
Linux Linux kernel>=5.10<5.15.168
Linux Linux kernel>=5.16<6.1.113
Linux Linux kernel>=6.2<6.6.55
Linux Linux kernel>=6.7<6.10.14
Linux Linux kernel>=6.11<6.11.3
debian/linux<=5.10.223-1, <=5.10.234-1
6.1.129-16.1.135-16.12.25-16.12.27-1
debian/linux-6.1
6.1.129-1~deb11u1
Microsoft cbl2 kernel 5.15.167.1-2
Microsoft azl3 kernel 6.6.51.1-5
Microsoft cbl2 kernel 5.15.167.1-2
Microsoft azl3 kernel 6.6.57.1-2
Microsoft cbl2 kernel 5.15.173.1-1

Event History

Oct 21, 2024
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:02 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:02 PM
Description
Data Sourced
via NVD·06:15 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·07:11 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Nov 12, 2024
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
Affected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
Affected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
SeverityAffected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
Description
Feb 16, 2025
Data Sourced
via Launchpad·06:12 AM
Description
Apr 29, 2025
Data Sourced
via Ubuntu·06:30 AM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2024-50002?

The severity of CVE-2024-50002 is currently evaluated as medium.

2

How do I fix CVE-2024-50002?

To fix CVE-2024-50002, upgrade the Linux kernel to a patched version such as 6.1.123-1, 6.1.128-1, 6.12.12-1, or 6.12.15-1.

3

Which versions of the Linux kernel are affected by CVE-2024-50002?

CVE-2024-50002 affects Linux kernel versions between 5.10 and 5.15.168, as well as several versions up to 6.11.3.

4

Is there a workaround for CVE-2024-50002?

Currently, there are no known workarounds for CVE-2024-50002; upgrading to a secure version is the recommended approach.

5

What components are impacted by CVE-2024-50002?

CVE-2024-50002 specifically impacts the static call functionality within the Linux kernel.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203