CVE-2024-56128: Apache Kafka: SCRAM authentication vulnerable to replay attacks when used without encryption
Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in Apache Kafka's SCRAM implementation.
Issue Summary: Apache Kafka's implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802 [1]. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka's SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation.
Impact: This vulnerability is exploitable only when an attacker has plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange. However, the usage of SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged as it is considered an insecure practice [2]. Apache Kafka recommends deploying SCRAM exclusively with TLS encryption to protect SCRAM exchanges from interception [3]. Deployments using SCRAM with TLS are not affected by this issue.
How to Detect If You Are Impacted: If your deployment uses SCRAM authentication over plaintext communication channels (without TLS encryption), you are likely impacted. To check if TLS is enabled, review your server.properties configuration file for listeners property. If you have SASLPLAINTEXT in the listeners, then you are likely impacted.
Fix Details: The issue has been addressed by introducing nonce verification in the final message of the SCRAM authentication exchange to ensure compliance with RFC 5802.
Affected Versions: Apache Kafka versions 0.10.2.0 through 3.9.0, excluding the fixed versions below.
Fixed Versions: 3.9.0 3.8.1 3.7.2
Users are advised to upgrade to 3.7.2 or later to mitigate this issue.
Recommendations for Mitigation: Users unable to upgrade to the fixed versions can mitigate the issue by: - Using TLS with SCRAM Authentication: Always deploy SCRAM over TLS to encrypt authentication exchanges and protect against interception. - Considering Alternative Authentication Mechanisms: Evaluate alternative authentication mechanisms, such as PLAIN, Kerberos or OAuth with TLS, which provide additional layers of security.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.12to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.8.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.12to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.7.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.13to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.8.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.13to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.7.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Kafkato a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.7.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Kafkato a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.8.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Kafkato a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.9.0 - Configuration
Check server.properties for the listeners property. If your deployment uses SASL_PLAINTEXT in listeners (or otherwise uses SCRAM over plaintext without TLS), reconfigure listeners so SCRAM authentication is used only with TLS (SCRAM over TLS); SCRAM over plaintext is strongly discouraged and is likely impacted.
Apache Kafka server.properties (listeners) listeners = Ensure SCRAM is configured only on TLS listener(s) (do not use SASL_PLAINTEXT for SCRAM).
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2024-56128?
The severity of CVE-2024-56128 is considered high due to improper implementation of the authentication algorithm.
How do I fix CVE-2024-56128?
To fix CVE-2024-56128, upgrade Apache Kafka to version 3.8.1 or later, or to version 3.7.2 if using earlier versions.
What versions of Apache Kafka are affected by CVE-2024-56128?
CVE-2024-56128 affects Apache Kafka versions 3.8.0 and any version from 0.10.2.0 up to 3.7.2.
What is the main issue with CVE-2024-56128?
The main issue with CVE-2024-56128 is that Apache Kafka's SCRAM implementation does not fully comply with the specifications outlined in RFC 5802.
Is there a workaround for CVE-2024-56128?
Currently, the recommended action for CVE-2024-56128 is to update to a secure version, as there are no known effective workarounds.