CVE-2025-27089: Medium severity Monospace Directus Node.js vulnerability

Published Feb 19, 2025
·
Updated

Summary If there are two overlapping policies for the update action that allow access to different fields, instead of correctly checking access permissions against the item they apply for the user is allowed to update the superset of fields allowed by any of the policies.

E.g. have one policy allowing update access to fielda if the id == 1 and one policy allowing update access to fieldb if the id == 2. The user with both these policies is allowed to update both fielda and fieldb for the items with ids 1 and 2.

Details Before v11, if a user was allowed to update an item they were allowed to update the fields that the single permission, that applied to that item, listed. With overlapping permissions this isn't as clear cut anymore and the union of fields might not be the fields the user is allowed to update for that specific item.

The solution that this PR introduces is to evaluate the permissions for each field that the user tries to update in the validateItemAccess DB query, instead of only verifying access to the item as a whole. This is done by, instead of returning the actual field value, returning a flag that indicates if the user has access to that field. This uses the same case/when mechanism that is used for stripping out non permitted field that is at the core of the permissions engine.

As a result, for every item that the access is validated for, the expected result is an item that has either 1 or null for all the "requested" fields instead of any of the actual field values. These results are not useful for anything other than verifying the field level access permissions.

The final check in validateItemAccess can either fail if the number of items does not match the number of items the access is checked for (ie. the user does not have access to the item at all) or if not all of the passed in fields have access permissions for any of the returned items.

Impact This is a vulnerability that allows update access to unintended fields, potentially impacting the password field for user accounts.

Other sources

Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. In affected versions if there are two overlapping policies for the update action that allow access to different fields, instead of correctly checking access permissions against the item they apply for the user is allowed to update the superset of fields allowed by any of the policies. E.g. have one policy allowing update access to fielda if the id == 1 and one policy allowing update access to fieldb if the id == 2. The user with both these policies is allowed to update both fielda and fieldb for the items with ids 1 and 2. Before v11, if a user was allowed to update an item they were allowed to update the fields that the single permission, that applied to that item, listed. With overlapping permissions this isn't as clear cut anymore and the union of fields might not be the fields the user is allowed to update for that specific item. The solution that this PR introduces is to evaluate the permissions for each field that the user tries to update in the validateItemAccess DB query, instead of only verifying access to the item as a whole. This is done by, instead of returning the actual field value, returning a flag that indicates if the user has access to that field. This uses the same case/when mechanism that is used for stripping out non permitted field that is at the core of the permissions engine. As a result, for every item that the access is validated for, the expected result is an item that has either 1 or null for all the "requested" fields instead of any of the actual field values. These results are not useful for anything other than verifying the field level access permissions. The final check in validateItemAccess can either fail if the number of items does not match the number of items the access is checked for (ie. the user does not have access to the item at all) or if not all of the passed in fields have access permissions for any of the returned items. This is a vulnerability that allows update access to unintended fields, potentially impacting the password field for user accounts. This has been addressed in version 11.1.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

NVD

Affected Software

3 affected componentsFixes available
npm/@directus/api>=22.0.0<23.1.0
23.1.0
npm/directus>=11.0.0<11.1.2
11.1.2
Monospace Directus Node.js>=11.0.0<11.1.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@directus/api to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 23.1.0
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/directus to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 11.1.2
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade Directus to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 11.1.2

Event History

Feb 19, 2025
CVE Published
via NVD·05:15 PM
Advisory Published
via GitHub·05:46 PM
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2025-27089?

CVE-2025-27089 is classified as a critical vulnerability due to the potential to allow unauthorized access to sensitive data.

2

How do I fix CVE-2025-27089?

To fix CVE-2025-27089, upgrade to versions 23.1.0 of @directus/api or 11.1.2 of directus.

3

What are the affected versions of CVE-2025-27089?

CVE-2025-27089 affects @directus/api versions 22.0.0 to 23.1.0 and directus versions 11.0.0 to 11.1.2.

4

What impact does CVE-2025-27089 have on applications?

CVE-2025-27089 allows users to update more fields than intended due to overlapping access policies.

5

Is CVE-2025-27089 a common vulnerability?

CVE-2025-27089 is specific to certain versions of the Directus API and is not widely prevalent across all applications.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203