CVE-2025-27104: double eval in For List Iter in Vyper

Published Feb 21, 2025
·
Updated

Multiple evaluation of a single expression is possible in the iterator target of a for loop. While the iterator expression cannot produce multiple writes, it can consume side effects produced in the loop body (e.g. read a storage variable updated in the loop body) and thus lead to unexpected program behavior. Specifically, reads in iterators which contain an ifexp (e.g. for s: uint256 in ([read(), read()] if True else [])) may interleave reads with writes in the loop body.

The fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4488.

Vulnerability Details

Vyper for loops allow two kinds of iterator targets, namely the range() builtin and an iterable type, like SArray and DArray.

During codegen, iterable lists are required to not produce any side-effects (in the following code, rangescope forces iterlist to be parsed in a constant context, which is checked against isconstant).

python def parseForlist(self): with self.context.rangescope(): iterlist = Expr(self.stmt.iter, self.context).irnode ...

def rangescope(self): prevvalue = self.inrangeexpr self.inrangeexpr = True yield self.inrangeexpr = prevvalue

def isconstant(self): return self.constancy is Constancy.Constant or self.inrangeexpr

However, this does not prevent the iterator from consuming side effects provided by the body of the loop. For dynamic arrays, the compiler simply panics: vyper x: DynArray[uint256, 3]

@external def test(): for i: uint256 in (self.usesideeffect() if True else self.usesideeffect()): pass

@view def usesideeffect() -> DynArray[uint256, 3]: return self.x

For SArrays on the other hand, iterlist is instantiated in the body of a repeat ir, so it can be evaluated several times.

Here are three illustrating examples. In the first example, the following test case pre-evaluates the iter list and stores the result to a temporary list in memory. So the list is only evaluated once, before entry into the loop body, and the log output will be 0, 0, 0. vyper event I: i: uint256

x: uint256

@deploy def init(): self.x = 0

@external def test(): for i: uint256 in [self.usesideeffect(), self.usesideeffect(), self.usesideeffect()]: self.x += 1 log I(i)

@view def usesideeffect() -> uint256: return self.x

However, in the next two examples, because the iterator target is not a list literal, it will be evaluated in the loop body. In the second example, iterlist is an ifexp, thus it will be evaluated lazily in the loop body. The log output will be 0, 1, 2 due to consumption of side effects.

vyper event I: i: uint256

x: uint256

@deploy def init(): self.x = 0

@external def test(): for i: uint256 in ([self.usesideeffect(), self.usesideeffect(), self.usesideeffect()] if True else self.otherclause()): self.x += 1 log I(i)

@view def usesideeffect() -> uint256: return self.x

@view def otherclause() -> uint256[3]: return [0, 0, 0]

In the third example, iterlist is also an ifexp, thus it will only be evaluated in the loop body. The log output will be 0, 1, 2 due to consumption of side effects.

vyper event I: i: uint256

x: uint256[3]

@deploy def init(): self.x = [0, 0, 0]

@external def test(): for i: uint256 in (self.usesideeffect() if True else self.otherclause()): self.x[0] += 1 self.x[1] += 1 self.x[2] += 1 log I(i)

@view def usesideeffect() -> uint256[3]: return self.x

@view def otherclause() -> uint256[3]: return [0, 0, 0]

Other sources

vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. Multiple evaluation of a single expression is possible in the iterator target of a for loop. While the iterator expression cannot produce multiple writes, it can consume side effects produced in the loop body (e.g. read a storage variable updated in the loop body) and thus lead to unexpected program behavior. Specifically, reads in iterators which contain an ifexp (e.g. for s: uint256 in ([read(), read()] if True else [])) may interleave reads with writes in the loop body. Vyper for loops allow two kinds of iterator targets, namely the range() builtin and an iterable type, like SArray and DArray. During codegen, iterable lists are required to not produce any side-effects (in the following code, rangescope forces iterlist to be parsed in a constant context, which is checked against isconstant). However, this does not prevent the iterator from consuming side effects provided by the body of the loop. For SArrays on the other hand, iterlist is instantiated in the body of a repeat ir, so it can be evaluated several times. This issue is being addressed and is expected to be available in version 0.4.1. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as the patched release is available. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

— MITRE

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
vyperlang Vyper Python<0.4.1
pip/vyper<=0.4.0
0.4.1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/vyper to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.4.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.4.1Patch https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4488

Event History

Feb 21, 2025
CVE Published
via MITRE·09:32 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·09:32 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·10:15 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Advisory Published
via GitHub·10:43 PM
May 16, 58462
Event
via NVD·01:44 PM

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2025-27104?

CVE-2025-27104 is considered a moderate severity vulnerability due to potential unintended side effects in loop iteration.

2

How do I fix CVE-2025-27104?

To fix CVE-2025-27104, upgrade the vyper package to version 0.4.1 or later.

3

What software is affected by CVE-2025-27104?

CVE-2025-27104 affects the vyper package versions up to and including 0.4.0.

4

What can happen if CVE-2025-27104 is exploited?

Exploitation of CVE-2025-27104 may lead to unexpected behavior in smart contracts due to multiple evaluations of loop expressions.

5

Is there a workaround for CVE-2025-27104?

Currently, the only reliable workaround for CVE-2025-27104 is to update to a fixed version of the vyper package.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203