CWE
416
Advisory Published
Updated

CVE-2025-37835: smb: client: Fix netns refcount imbalance causing leaks and use-after-free

First published: Fri May 09 2025(Updated: )

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: Fix netns refcount imbalance causing leaks and use-after-free Commit ef7134c7fc48 ("smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace.") attempted to fix a netns use-after-free issue by manually adjusting reference counts via sk->sk_net_refcnt and sock_inuse_add(). However, a later commit e9f2517a3e18 ("smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod") pointed out that the approach of manually setting sk->sk_net_refcnt in the first commit was technically incorrect, as sk->sk_net_refcnt should only be set for user sockets. It led to issues like TCP timers not being cleared properly on close. The second commit moved to a model of just holding an extra netns reference for server->ssocket using get_net(), and dropping it when the server is torn down. But there remain some gaps in the get_net()/put_net() balancing added by these commits. The incomplete reference handling in these fixes results in two issues: 1. Netns refcount leaks[1] The problem process is as follows: ``` mount.cifs cifsd cifs_do_mount cifs_mount cifs_mount_get_session cifs_get_tcp_session get_net() /* First get net. */ ip_connect generic_ip_connect /* Try port 445 */ get_net() ->connect() /* Failed */ put_net() generic_ip_connect /* Try port 139 */ get_net() /* Missing matching put_net() for this get_net().*/ cifs_get_smb_ses cifs_negotiate_protocol smb2_negotiate SMB2_negotiate cifs_send_recv wait_for_response cifs_demultiplex_thread cifs_read_from_socket cifs_readv_from_socket cifs_reconnect cifs_abort_connection sock_release(); server->ssocket = NULL; /* Missing put_net() here. */ generic_ip_connect get_net() ->connect() /* Failed */ put_net() sock_release(); server->ssocket = NULL; free_rsp_buf ... clean_demultiplex_info /* It's only called once here. */ put_net() ``` When cifs_reconnect() is triggered, the server->ssocket is released without a corresponding put_net() for the reference acquired in generic_ip_connect() before. it ends up calling generic_ip_connect() again to retry get_net(). After that, server->ssocket is set to NULL in the error path of generic_ip_connect(), and the net count cannot be released in the final clean_demultiplex_info() function. 2. Potential use-after-free The current refcounting scheme can lead to a potential use-after-free issue in the following scenario: ``` cifs_do_mount cifs_mount cifs_mount_get_session cifs_get_tcp_session get_net() /* First get net */ ip_connect generic_ip_connect get_net() bind_socket kernel_bind /* failed */ put_net() /* after out_err_crypto_release label */ put_net() /* after out_err label */ put_net() ``` In the exception handling process where binding the socket fails, the get_net() and put_net() calls are unbalanced, which may cause the server->net reference count to drop to zero and be prematurely released. To address both issues, this patch ties the netns reference counti ---truncated---

Credit: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

Affected SoftwareAffected VersionHow to fix
Linux Kernel

Never miss a vulnerability like this again

Sign up to SecAlerts for real-time vulnerability data matched to your software, aggregated from hundreds of sources.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the severity of CVE-2025-37835?

    CVE-2025-37835 has been classified as a medium severity vulnerability due to potential use-after-free issues.

  • How do I fix CVE-2025-37835?

    To fix CVE-2025-37835, update your Linux kernel to the patched version that addresses the smb: client netns refcount issue.

  • What affected software is identified in CVE-2025-37835?

    CVE-2025-37835 affects the Linux kernel, specifically its SMB client functionalities.

  • Can CVE-2025-37835 lead to data leaks?

    Yes, CVE-2025-37835 can potentially lead to data leaks due to the netns reference count imbalance.

  • Is CVE-2025-37835 exploitable remotely?

    CVE-2025-37835 is not inherently remote exploitable but does pose risks in scenarios where the vulnerable kernel is exposed to untrusted networks.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2025 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203