CVE-2025-69203: Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing
Signal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Versions prior to 2.19.0 of the access request system have two related features that when combined by themselves and with an information disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: clientId, description, and permissions. The SignalK admin UI displays the description field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual permissions field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request admin permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access. The access request handler trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses. Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval. Users should upgrade to version 2.19.0 to fix this issue.
Other sources
The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators.
When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: clientId, description, and permissions. The SignalK admin UI displays the description field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual permissions field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request admin permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access.
The access request handler trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses.
Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval.
Affected Code
File: packages/server-admin-ui/src/views/security/AccessRequests.js
The admin UI renders access requests showing the description field prominently. The permissions field is displayed but may not be as visually prominent, leading administrators to approve based on the description text.
File: src/tokensecurity.js (access request creation and IP extraction)
javascript // Access request accepts any permissions value from the client const permissions = req.body.permissions // No validation against description
// IP address extraction trusts X-Forwarded-For without validation const ip = req.headers['x-forwarded-for'] || req.connection.remoteAddress
The code prioritizes the X-Forwarded-For header over the actual connection IP, allowing client-controlled spoofing.
Impact
An administrator who trusts device descriptions and IP addresses may inadvertently grant admin privileges to an attacker. The combination of spoofed device name, misleading description, and trusted internal IP address creates a highly convincing social engineering attack. Combined with the token theft vulnerability, this provides a complete authentication bypass requiring only one click from the admin.
PoC
python import requests
TARGET = "http://localhost:3000" SPOOFEDIP = "192.168.1.100"
def createspoofedrequest(devicename): payload = { "clientId": devicename, "description": f"{devicename} - Read Only", # Misleading "permissions": "admin" # Actually requesting admin! } headers = { "Content-Type": "application/json", "X-Forwarded-For": SPOOFEDIP # Spoof internal IP } r = requests.post( f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/access/requests", json=payload, headers=headers ) if r.statuscode == 202: data = r.json() href = data.get("href") requestid = href.split("/")[-1] if href else None print(f"[+] Access request created!") print(f"[+] Request ID: {requestid}") print(f"[+] Admin sees: '{payload['description']}'") print(f"[+] Actual permissions: {payload['permissions']}") print(f"[+] Spoofed IP: {SPOOFEDIP}") return requestid else: print(f"[-] Failed: {r.statuscode} - {r.text}") return None
if name == "main": # First enumerate devices/sources using info disclosure vulnerability sources = requests.get(f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/api/sources").json() devices = [d for d in sources.keys() if d != "defaults"] if devices: print(f"[+] Found devices: {devices}") createspoofedrequest(devices[0]) else: createspoofedrequest("sensor-01")
Recommendation
1. Display permissions prominently. The admin UI should prominently display the requested permission level with visual warnings for elevated permissions (readwrite, admin). Consider requiring administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval rather than accepting the requested value. 2. Validate X-Forwarded-For headers. Only trust X-Forwarded-For headers from configured trusted proxy IP addresses. Implement Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent. Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for audit purposes. 3. Whitelist device IP addresses. Implement an IP whitelist for access requests, allowing only known device IP addresses to create requests. This prevents external attackers from creating spoofed requests.
— GitHub
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/signalk-serverto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.19.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Signal K Serverto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.19.0 - Configuration
Require administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval instead of accepting the client-requested value.
Signal K access request approval permission selection = administrator-selected - Configuration
Display the requested permission level prominently in the approval interface, with visual warnings for elevated permissions.
Signal K admin UI requested permission display = prominent with visual warnings for readwrite and admin - Configuration
Configure Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent so X-Forwarded-For is trusted only from configured trusted proxy IP addresses, and validate the header.
Express.js access request handler trusted proxy IPs for X-Forwarded-For = configured trusted proxy IP addresses only - Configuration
Implement an IP whitelist allowing only known device IP addresses to create access requests.
Signal K access request system access request IP whitelist = known device IP addresses only - Operational
Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for access-request auditing.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2025-69203?
CVE-2025-69203 is considered a moderate severity vulnerability due to its potential for enabling convincing social engineering attacks.
How do I fix CVE-2025-69203?
To fix CVE-2025-69203, upgrade Signal K Server to version 2.19.0 or later.
What feature combination leads to CVE-2025-69203?
CVE-2025-69203 results from the combination of two related features in the access request system that, along with an information disclosure vulnerability, facilitate social engineering attacks.
What is Signal K Server?
Signal K Server is a central hub server application designed for use in boats to manage and relay navigational data.
Which versions of Signal K Server are affected by CVE-2025-69203?
Signal K Server versions prior to 2.19.0 are affected by CVE-2025-69203.