CVE-2025-69203: Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing

Published Jan 1, 2026
·
Updated

Signal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Versions prior to 2.19.0 of the access request system have two related features that when combined by themselves and with an information disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: clientId, description, and permissions. The SignalK admin UI displays the description field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual permissions field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request admin permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access. The access request handler trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses. Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval. Users should upgrade to version 2.19.0 to fix this issue.

Other sources

The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators.

When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: clientId, description, and permissions. The SignalK admin UI displays the description field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual permissions field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request admin permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access.

The access request handler trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses.

Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval.

Affected Code

File: packages/server-admin-ui/src/views/security/AccessRequests.js

The admin UI renders access requests showing the description field prominently. The permissions field is displayed but may not be as visually prominent, leading administrators to approve based on the description text.

File: src/tokensecurity.js (access request creation and IP extraction)

javascript // Access request accepts any permissions value from the client const permissions = req.body.permissions // No validation against description

// IP address extraction trusts X-Forwarded-For without validation const ip = req.headers['x-forwarded-for'] || req.connection.remoteAddress

The code prioritizes the X-Forwarded-For header over the actual connection IP, allowing client-controlled spoofing.

Impact

An administrator who trusts device descriptions and IP addresses may inadvertently grant admin privileges to an attacker. The combination of spoofed device name, misleading description, and trusted internal IP address creates a highly convincing social engineering attack. Combined with the token theft vulnerability, this provides a complete authentication bypass requiring only one click from the admin.

PoC

python import requests

TARGET = "http://localhost:3000" SPOOFEDIP = "192.168.1.100"

def createspoofedrequest(devicename): payload = { "clientId": devicename, "description": f"{devicename} - Read Only", # Misleading "permissions": "admin" # Actually requesting admin! } headers = { "Content-Type": "application/json", "X-Forwarded-For": SPOOFEDIP # Spoof internal IP } r = requests.post( f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/access/requests", json=payload, headers=headers ) if r.statuscode == 202: data = r.json() href = data.get("href") requestid = href.split("/")[-1] if href else None print(f"[+] Access request created!") print(f"[+] Request ID: {requestid}") print(f"[+] Admin sees: '{payload['description']}'") print(f"[+] Actual permissions: {payload['permissions']}") print(f"[+] Spoofed IP: {SPOOFEDIP}") return requestid else: print(f"[-] Failed: {r.statuscode} - {r.text}") return None

if name == "main": # First enumerate devices/sources using info disclosure vulnerability sources = requests.get(f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/api/sources").json() devices = [d for d in sources.keys() if d != "defaults"] if devices: print(f"[+] Found devices: {devices}") createspoofedrequest(devices[0]) else: createspoofedrequest("sensor-01")

Recommendation

1. Display permissions prominently. The admin UI should prominently display the requested permission level with visual warnings for elevated permissions (readwrite, admin). Consider requiring administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval rather than accepting the requested value. 2. Validate X-Forwarded-For headers. Only trust X-Forwarded-For headers from configured trusted proxy IP addresses. Implement Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent. Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for audit purposes. 3. Whitelist device IP addresses. Implement an IP whitelist for access requests, allowing only known device IP addresses to create requests. This prevents external attackers from creating spoofed requests.

— GitHub

Affected Software

7 affected componentsFixes available
Signal K Signal K Server<2.19.0
npm/signalk-server<2.19.0
2.19.0
SignalK Signal K Server<2.19.0
SignalK Signal K Server=2.19.0-beta1
SignalK Signal K Server=2.19.0-beta2
SignalK Signal K Server=2.19.0-beta3
SignalK Signal K Server=2.19.0-beta4

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/signalk-server to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.19.0
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade Signal K Server to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.19.0
  3. Configuration

    Require administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval instead of accepting the client-requested value.

    Signal K access request approval permission selection = administrator-selected
  4. Configuration

    Display the requested permission level prominently in the approval interface, with visual warnings for elevated permissions.

    Signal K admin UI requested permission display = prominent with visual warnings for readwrite and admin
  5. Configuration

    Configure Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent so X-Forwarded-For is trusted only from configured trusted proxy IP addresses, and validate the header.

    Express.js access request handler trusted proxy IPs for X-Forwarded-For = configured trusted proxy IP addresses only
  6. Configuration

    Implement an IP whitelist allowing only known device IP addresses to create access requests.

    Signal K access request system access request IP whitelist = known device IP addresses only
  7. Operational

    Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for access-request auditing.

Event History

Jan 1, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:37 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:37 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·07:15 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Jan 2, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·03:26 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·03:26 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2025-69203?

CVE-2025-69203 is considered a moderate severity vulnerability due to its potential for enabling convincing social engineering attacks.

2

How do I fix CVE-2025-69203?

To fix CVE-2025-69203, upgrade Signal K Server to version 2.19.0 or later.

3

What feature combination leads to CVE-2025-69203?

CVE-2025-69203 results from the combination of two related features in the access request system that, along with an information disclosure vulnerability, facilitate social engineering attacks.

4

What is Signal K Server?

Signal K Server is a central hub server application designed for use in boats to manage and relay navigational data.

5

Which versions of Signal K Server are affected by CVE-2025-69203?

Signal K Server versions prior to 2.19.0 are affected by CVE-2025-69203.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203