CVE-2026-100670: Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 Privilege Escalation via Blueprint Guard Bypass

Published Sep 26, 2026
·
Updated

Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the group and account blueprints. The access map is gated by a security@: admin.super guard that is resolved by the field's exact path, so a submitted flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super (instead of the nested access[admin][super]) matches no blueprint rule, survives BlueprintSchema::filterArray() and flattening, and is written by FlexObject::update() via setNestedProperty(), which splits on . and reconstructs the nested value. An authenticated backend operator using the flex accounts backend who holds admin.users but not admin.super can therefore grant admin.super to their own account or to a group they belong to and escalate to full super-admin, gaining control over configuration, plugin and theme installation, the file manager, and all accounts. Fixed in 2.0.25, which drops any dotted key whose ancestor path is disabled or marked validate.ignore.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Grav Grav CMS>=2.0.14<=2.0.24

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade Grav CMS to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.0.25

Event History

Sep 26, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·01:23 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·01:23 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·02:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which users can exploit this issue?

An authenticated backend operator using the flex accounts backend is affected if they have the admin.users permission but do not already have admin.super. They can assign admin.super to their own account or to a group they belong to.

2

What access is required for exploitation?

The attacker needs authenticated access to the backend and access to the flex accounts functionality. Exploitation uses a flat dot-notation field name, such as access.admin.super, rather than the expected nested form submission.

3

Are fixed versions available?

Yes. Grav CMS 2.0.25 fixes the issue by dropping dotted keys when an ancestor blueprint path is disabled or marked validate.ignore.

4

How can I identify potentially affected deployments?

Deployments running Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 are in scope. Review backend accounts and group memberships for unexpected admin.super assignments, particularly where users with admin.users permission had access to the flex accounts backend.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203