CVE-2026-107724: fast-jwt treats raw public JWK JSON as an HMAC secret, enabling HS256 token forgery
Summary
fast-jwt 6.2.4 silently classifies raw serialized public JWK JSON as an HMAC secret.
If an application supplies public JWK JSON text as the verifier key and HS256 is explicitly allowed or automatically inferred, an attacker who knows the same public JSON text can use it as an HMAC key and create an arbitrary HS256 token that fast-jwt accepts as valid.
This can result in authentication or authorization bypass through forged JWT claims.
The PoC demonstrates the issue with a serialized RSA public JWK. The same non-PEM classification also applies to raw JWKS JSON text, although the attached standalone PoC focuses on the smallest JWK case.
Details
The verifier accepts a string or Buffer as key material. In src/crypto.js, performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms() attempts to infer the permitted algorithm family from the supplied string.
Strings matching supported PEM public-key formats are classified as asymmetric keys. Any other non-empty string is assumed to be an HMAC secret:
js function performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms(key) { const trimmedKey = key.trim() const publicKeyPemMatch = trimmedKey.match(publicKeyPemMatcher)
if (trimmedKey.match(privateKeyPemMatcher)) { throw new TokenError( TokenError.codes.invalidKey, 'Private keys are not supported for verifying.' ) } else if ( publicKeyPemMatch && publicKeyPemMatch[1] === 'RSA' ) { return rsaAlgorithms } else if ( !publicKeyPemMatch && !trimmedKey.includes(publicKeyX509CertMatcher) ) { // Not a PEM, assume a plain secret return hsAlgorithms }
// ... }
A serialized RSA, EC, or OKP public JWK is valid JSON, but it is not PEM and does not contain a certificate header. It therefore reaches:
return hsAlgorithms
The HS256 verification path then uses the complete public JSON string as the HMAC key.
Because JWK public-key material is public by design, an attacker can know the verifier's cryptographic key material. When that public material is reinterpreted as an HMAC secret, the attacker can calculate a valid HS256 signature over arbitrary claims.
The vulnerable transition is:
Public asymmetric JWK JSON | v Does not match PEM detection | v Classified as a plain secret | v HS256 permitted or inferred | v Attacker signs using public JSON bytes | v Forged token accepted
The attached PoC demonstrates both relevant configurations:
An explicit mixed-family allowlist: createVerifier({ key: rawJwk, algorithms: ['HS256', 'RS256'] }) No explicit algorithm allowlist: createVerifier({ key: rawJwk })
In the second configuration, fast-jwt detects the raw non-PEM string as symmetric key material and permits the HS algorithm family.
An RS256-only verifier rejects the same forged token, providing a negative control:
createVerifier({ key: rawJwk, algorithms: ['RS256'] })
The documentation describes asymmetric verifier keys as PEM-encoded public keys. The security issue is not that the raw JWK is successfully parsed as an asymmetric key. It is that ambiguous structured public-key text is silently reclassified as a symmetric secret rather than being rejected, and that this classification permits an attacker-controlled HS256 token.
PoC
Requirements:
Node.js 20 or newer npm The attached submission ZIP
Extract the attachment and run:
cd poc npm install node poc.js
The PoC performs the following steps:
Generates a fresh RSA key pair locally. Exports only the public key as a JWK. Adds ordinary public JWK metadata such as kid, use, and alg. Serializes the public JWK as JSON. Uses the serialized public JWK text as an HS256 HMAC key. Creates a token containing attacker-selected administrative claims. Supplies the same raw public JSON string to the real fast-jwt verifier. Confirms acceptance with a mixed HS256/RS256 allowlist. Confirms acceptance when algorithm detection is left enabled. Confirms rejection with an RS256-only verifier.
Expected output:
mixed algorithms: forged token accepted inferred algorithms: forged token accepted RS256-only control: forged token rejected VULNERABLE: fast-jwt@6.2.4 accepted attacker-signed HS256 claims
The accepted token contains:
{ "sub": "attacker", "role": "admin", "admin": true }
The PoC operates entirely locally using a newly generated key pair. It does not contact any production service, identity provider, or third-party application.
Impact
An affected application may accept attacker-generated JWT claims as authentic.
Depending on how verified claims are used, an attacker could potentially forge:
user or subject identifiers; administrator roles; authorization scopes; permissions; tenant or organization identifiers; and application-specific authorization flags.
This may result in authentication bypass, horizontal privilege escalation, vertical privilege escalation, or unauthorized access to protected application data.
Exploitation requires all of the following:
The application passes raw serialized public JWK or JWKS JSON text as the verifier key. HS256 is explicitly permitted or is inferred from the non-PEM string. The attacker knows the exact serialized bytes supplied to the verifier.
Public JWK/JWKS material is normally available to relying parties and often exposed through public discovery endpoints. However, property ordering, whitespace, or other serialization differences may affect an attacker's ability to reproduce the exact HMAC key bytes.
These integration and serialization requirements are represented by High attack complexity.
Applications that supply a supported PEM public key and restrict verification to the expected asymmetric algorithm family are not affected by this PoC.
Earlier package versions were not assessed as part of this report.
Suggested remediation
Structured public-key representations should be detected before an arbitrary non-PEM string is classified as symmetric key material.
At minimum, JSON strings containing asymmetric JWK or JWKS structures should be rejected for HS verification. Relevant asymmetric kty values include:
RSA EC OKP
Potential approaches include:
Parse JSON-looking verifier strings before HMAC classification. Reject asymmetric JWK/JWKS structures for HS256, HS384, and HS512. Do not treat all non-PEM strings as symmetric secrets merely because PEM detection failed. Require explicit algorithm selection when the key format is ambiguous. Bind the permitted algorithm family to the semantic key type rather than the success or failure of PEM detection.
Regression tests should cover:
compact serialized JWK JSON; pretty-printed JWK JSON; raw JWKS JSON; RSA, EC, and OKP public keys; mixed symmetric/asymmetric algorithm allowlists; default algorithm detection; asymmetric-only algorithm controls; trailing whitespace and newline variants; and property-order and serialization variants. fast-jwt-raw-jwk-hs256-submit.zip
Other sources
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. In 6.2.4, fast-jwt can classify raw serialized public JWK or JWKS JSON as an HMAC secret because src/crypto.js performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms treats non-PEM strings as symmetric key material. If HS256 is explicitly allowed or inferred, an attacker who knows the exact serialized public-key bytes can use those bytes as an HMAC key and create a token containing arbitrary claims that createVerifier accepts. Serialization ordering or whitespace differences can prevent exploitation, and applications using supported PEM keys with an asymmetric-only algorithm allowlist are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 6.3.0.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/fast-jwtto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.3.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
fast-jwtto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.3.0 - Configuration
Restrict verification to the asymmetric RS256 algorithm family and do not allow HS256 when using public JWK or JWKS material.
fast-jwt verifier algorithms = ['RS256']
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed to token forgery?
Deployments using fast-jwt 6.2.4 are exposed when raw serialized public JWK or JWKS JSON is supplied as key material and HS256 is explicitly allowed or inferred. Applications using supported PEM keys with an asymmetric-only algorithm allowlist are not affected.
What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?
An attacker needs the exact serialized bytes of the public JWK or JWKS JSON used by the application. They can use those bytes as an HMAC key to create an HS256 token with arbitrary claims that createVerifier accepts; differences in serialization ordering or whitespace can prevent exploitation.
What is the remediation?
Upgrade fast-jwt to version 6.3.0, which fixes the issue. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict verification to asymmetric algorithms and use supported PEM public keys rather than raw serialized JWK or JWKS JSON.