CVE-2026-107851: Contao: Improper access control in the table access voter

Published Oct 9, 2026
·
Updated

Contao is an Open Source CMS. From version 5.7.0 until 5.7.12, TableAccessVoter::hasAccessToModule() in core-bundle/src/Security/Voter/DataContainer/TableAccessVoter.php caches authorization decisions using only $tokenHash, a hash of the user's security token, and omits the table returned by getDataSource(). If one request first checks a table allowed to the user and then a different denied table, the voter can reuse the allowed result, while DefaultDataContainerVoter can convert an incorrect abstention into a grant. A low-privileged backend user can consequently read, create, update, or delete records in tables outside assigned module permissions, including tables containing member or newsletter-subscriber data. This issue is fixed in version 5.7.12.

Other sources

Due to a caching defect in the security voter that governs table-level access to Contao's Data Container (DCA) backend, a low-privileged, non-admin backend user can obtain unauthorized read, create, update, and delete access to database tables outside their assigned module permissions. This includes tables containing sensitive personal data, such as frontend member records and newsletter subscriber e-mail addresses.

Vulnerability Details

In plain terms: Contao's backend is organized into modules (e.g. "News", "Members"). Every backend user is assigned to a group, and that group decides which modules, and therefore which database tables, they are allowed to work with. Before Contao lets a user touch a table, it is supposed to check: "does this user's group actually include this table?"

To avoid doing that check over and over, Contao remembers the answer for the rest of the request. The problem is that it remembers the answer under the wrong label. Instead of remembering "is this user allowed to access table X", it only remembers "is this user allowed to access something", without recording which table the answer was actually about. So if a request first checks a table the user IS allowed to see, and then checks a second, completely different table the user is NOT allowed to see, Contao reuses the first answer for the second table too. The user ends up with access to a table their group was never given permission for. Technical detail Contao's backend enforces per-table access control through a chain of Symfony security voters. The relevant one is TableAccessVoter::hasAccessToModule(), in core-bundle/src/Security/Voter/DataContainer/TableAccessVoter.php: php private array $canAccessTable = []; private array $canReadAccessTable = []; private function hasAccessToModule(TokenInterface $token, ...): bool { $tokenHash = hash('xxh128', serialize($token)); if (isset($this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash]) || (...)) { return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] ?? $this->canReadAccessTable[$tokenHash]; } $table = $subject->getDataSource(); foreach ($GLOBALS['BEMOD'] as $modules) { ... return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] = true; // or false } }

The cache key, $tokenHash, is built only from the current user's security token. It does not include the table being checked. Because TableAccessVoter is a normal, shared Symfony service, this cache stays alive for the whole duration of one HTTP request. So the first table checked for a user in a request decides the cached answer for every other table checked afterwards in that same request, whether or not that answer is actually correct for the second table. This is made worse by DefaultDataContainerVoter, a low-priority, permissive fallback voter that grants access to any table-related permission unless another voter explicitly denies it. When TableAccessVoter gives a wrong "no opinion" answer because of the stale cache, this fallback voter turns that into a full grant. Most database tables in Contao have no second, table-specific check to catch this. Only tlcontent, tlfavorites, tlform, tlformfield, tlmodule, tlimagesize(item), tljob, tllayout, tlpage, tlpreviewlink, tlundo, and tluser have one. Tables such as tlmember (website member data), tlnewsletterrecipients (subscriber e-mail addresses), tlnews, tlcalendarevents, tlfaq, and tlcomments rely only on the defective check described above.

Credits

This security vulnerability was found by Sven Jäger of SySS GmbH.

— GitHub

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
Contao Contao>=5.7.0<5.7.12
composer/contao/core-bundle>=5.7.0<5.7.12
5.7.12

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade composer/contao/core-bundle to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.7.12
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade Contao to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.7.12

Event History

Oct 9, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·08:26 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·08:26 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:53 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:53 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are affected?

Contao versions from 5.7.0 through 5.7.11 are affected. The issue is fixed in version 5.7.12.

2

What level of access does an attacker need?

An attacker needs a low-privileged backend user account. No user interaction is required, and the attacker can exploit the issue over the network.

3

What could an affected backend user do?

A user may be able to read, create, update, or delete records in tables outside the module permissions assigned to that user. This can include tables containing member or newsletter-subscriber data.

4

What condition triggers the authorization bypass?

During a request, the access voter must first evaluate a table the user is allowed to access and then evaluate a different table the user should be denied. The cached allowed decision can be reused because the cache key does not include the table returned by getDataSource().

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203