CVE-2026-110833: FreeRDP before 3.32.0 Unbounded Memory Retention via RDPDR Proxy

Published Oct 14, 2026
·
Updated

FreeRDP from 3.0.0-beta1 before 3.32.0 fails to enforce cumulative or absolute size limits when reassembling RDPDR channel fragments in the proxy. Attackers can send a FIRST fragment followed by continuation fragments without LAST, growing per-session heap streams proportional to traffic and exhausting proxy memory.

Affected Software

12 affected componentsFixes available
FreeRDP freerdp>=3.0.0-beta1<3.32.0
ubuntu/freerdp*
ubuntu/freerdp2*
ubuntu/freerdp*
ubuntu/freerdp2*
ubuntu/freerdp2*
ubuntu/freerdp3<3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
ubuntu/freerdp2*
ubuntu/freerdp3<3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
FreeRDP freerdp>=3.0.0<3.32.0
debian/freerdp2<=2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1
debian/freerdp3<=3.15.0+dfsg-2.1+deb13u3
3.32.2+dfsg-1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade ubuntu/freerdp3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.24.04.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade ubuntu/freerdp3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.32.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade debian/freerdp3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.32.2+dfsg-1

Event History

Oct 14, 2026
CVE Published
via Ubuntu·12:00 AM
Data Sourced
via Ubuntu·12:00 AM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityAffected Software
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:52 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:52 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via OSV·11:17 PM
Affected Software
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:17 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:17 PM
Affected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

FreeRDP versions from 3.0.0-beta1 through versions before 3.32.0 are affected when handling RDPDR channel fragments in the proxy. The issue is per session and can exhaust proxy memory.

2

What does an attacker need to do to trigger the memory exhaustion?

An attacker needs network access to send crafted RDPDR proxy traffic. They send a FIRST fragment and then continuation fragments without a LAST fragment, causing the session heap stream to grow with incoming traffic.

3

Does exploitation require authentication or user interaction?

No. The supplied vector indicates no privileges and no user interaction are required, although exploitation has high attack complexity.

4

What is the impact if exploitation succeeds?

The vulnerability affects availability: retained fragment data can grow until proxy memory is exhausted. No confidentiality or integrity impact is indicated.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203