CVE-2026-110861: Better Auth drizzle-adapter 1.6.17 before 1.7.7 Rate Limit Bypass via Race Condition

Published Oct 14, 2026
·
Updated

Better Auth @better-auth/drizzle-adapter and better-auth from 1.6.17 before 1.7.7, and @better-auth/kysely-adapter from 1.6.17 before 1.7.0, contain a race condition in database-backed rate limiting on PostgreSQL where the limit check is not atomic with the counter update. Remote attackers can send bursts of concurrent requests that pass the check together, exceeding configured limits on password sign-in, two-factor verification, one-time code, password reset, and other rate-limited endpoints.

Affected Software

3 affected components
npm/@better-auth/drizzle-adapter>=1.6.17<1.7.7
npm/better-auth>=1.6.17<1.7.7
npm/@better-auth/kysely-adapter>=1.6.17<1.7.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade better-auth to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.7.7
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade @better-auth/drizzle-adapter to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.7.7
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade @better-auth/kysely-adapter to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.7.0

Event History

Oct 14, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:52 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:52 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to this issue?

Deployments using database-backed rate limiting on PostgreSQL are affected if they use better-auth or @better-auth/drizzle-adapter from 1.6.17 before 1.7.7, or @better-auth/kysely-adapter from 1.6.17 before 1.7.0.

2

What must an attacker do to bypass the configured limit?

An unauthenticated remote attacker must send a burst of concurrent requests. The race condition allows multiple requests to pass the database-backed limit check before the counter updates.

3

Which functions can be impacted by the bypass?

Affected rate-limited endpoints include password sign-in, two-factor verification, one-time code processing, and password reset. Other endpoints using the same database-backed rate-limiting behavior may also be affected.

4

Does exploitation require credentials or user interaction?

No. The supplied vector indicates that exploitation requires neither privileges nor user interaction, but it has high attack complexity because the attacker must successfully trigger the race with concurrent requests.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203