CVE-2026-111761: A2A Java SDK has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in push-notification delivery
---
- Ecosystem: Maven - Affected package: org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common (push-notification delivery) - Affected versions: <= 1.2.0.Final (and 1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOT on main prior to the fix) - Patched version: (the release that carries the fix) - CWE: CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) - Severity: High - CVSS v3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N (5.8, Moderate)
---
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can coerce the a2a-java server into issuing HTTP requests to arbitrary internal and cloud-metadata endpoints from the server's own network position — a Server-Side Request Forgery reachable in the default deployment with no credentials, no user interaction, and a single request. The behaviour is the shipped default, not a misconfiguration.
Details
BasePushNotificationSender (in server-common) POSTs task data to the URL stored on a task's TaskPushNotificationConfig with no validation of the destination: no block on loopback, RFC1918, link-local (169.254.0.0/16, including the 169.254.169.254 metadata address), unique-local, unspecified, or multicast ranges; no scheme restriction; and no bound on redirects. InMemoryPushNotificationConfigStore.setInfo stores the URL verbatim and onCreateTaskPushNotificationConfig does not check it either.
Both shipped HTTP clients follow redirects (JdkA2AHttpClient → followRedirects(NORMAL), VertxA2AHttpClient → setFollowRedirects(true)), so a creation-time URL allowlist is bypassable: an attacker webhook answers 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/... and the client follows it. A hostname check is likewise defeated by DNS rebinding. A correct guard must validate the resolved IP of every hop at connection time, not the URL string.
Exploitation
Demonstrated end-to-end against a running server (default wiring, unauthenticated caller):
- Arbitrary internal reachability. The attacker picks the destination and the server issues the request from inside the trust boundary. Delivery to loopback and to a real RFC1918 LAN address was exercised at runtime; because the code applies no destination filtering of any kind, the same path reaches link-local / metadata (169.254.169.254) and other internal ranges wherever network routing permits. - Allowlist + method bypass via redirect. A 302 from the attacker's webhook reaches destinations a creation-time allowlist would block, and a 302 on a POST is followed as a GET — so GET-only endpoints such as the IMDS credentials path are reachable even though the sender only issues POSTs. This is why a URL allowlist is not a sufficient fix; the guard must validate the resolved IP of every redirect hop. - Data push into internal services. On direct (non-redirected) delivery, each request carries the task payload in the body, so internal services that ingest POST data receive attacker-influenced content (basis for I:L). On a redirected request the body is dropped in the POST→GET conversion, so the body-push and the redirect-reach are separate capabilities, not simultaneous on one request.
The sender discards the fetched response and exposes no caller-visible difference between a successful and a failed delivery (both paths return without surfacing status or body), so the base case reads back nothing — confidentiality is scored C:N. Read-back is limited, reach is not: the attacker still drives fully controlled requests to metadata and internal services and writes data into them.
PoC
Against a running server with push notifications enabled (JSON-RPC transport), using only the real production classes wired the default way:
1. Start a local listener standing in for an internal target (no real metadata service is touched). 2. Send one SendMessage that starts a long-running task, with the push config inlined and its url set to http://<internal-target>/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/. Use returnImmediately: true, header A2A-Version: 1.0, and role ROLEUSER. The URL is stored verbatim. (Equivalent via CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig on an existing task.) 3. As the task emits state/artifact updates, the sender POSTs each one to the stored URL, from the server's own network position:
POST /latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ HTTP/1.1 Host: 169.254.169.254 Content-Type: application/json
{"artifactUpdate":{"taskId":"...","artifact":{"parts":[{"text":"Progress update 1/20"}]}, ...}}
One SendMessage produced multiple server-side POSTs to the attacker-chosen internal path. Verified on main (commit 72d220c, JDK 21) and unchanged on 1.2.0.Final.
Remediation
Validate the resolved IP of the target and of every redirect hop before connecting: reject loopback / RFC1918 / link-local / metadata / unique-local / unspecified / multicast; restrict the scheme to http/https; cap redirects; and resolve-and-pin to defeat DNS rebinding. Enable by default, with a documented opt-out for deployments that intentionally target internal webhooks. The Go A2A SDK ships a dial-time resolved-IP guard of this shape by default.
Workaround: until a fixed release, block the host's outbound egress to the metadata endpoint and internal ranges at the network layer.
References
- CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
Other sources
A2A Java SDK is the official Java SDK for the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol. Prior to 1.3.0.Final, BasePushNotificationSender in server-common sends task data to the URL in TaskPushNotificationConfig without destination validation, scheme restrictions, or bounds on redirects. InMemoryPushNotificationConfigStore.setInfo stores the URL verbatim, and onCreateTaskPushNotificationConfig does not validate the destination. In the default deployment with push notifications enabled, an unauthenticated caller can register a destination through an inline SendMessage configuration or CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig for an existing task, causing task status and artifact updates to send requests from the server's network position to loopback, private, link-local cloud-metadata, IPv6 unique-local, unspecified, or multicast destinations where routing permits. JdkA2AHttpClient and VertxA2AHttpClient follow redirects, allowing a webhook redirect to bypass creation-time destination checks and convert a POST into a GET; hostname-only checks also do not prevent DNS rebinding. Direct POST delivery can push attacker-influenced task data into internal services, whereas a redirected POST-to-GET request drops the body. The sender discards the fetched response and does not expose delivery success or failure, so the demonstrated behavior does not provide response read-back. No credentials or user interaction are required. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.0.Final.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
maven/org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.3.0.Final - Upgrade
Upgrade
org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.3.0.Final - Compensating control
Block the host's outbound egress to the metadata endpoint until a fixed release is deployed.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Is an unauthenticated attacker able to trigger this in a default deployment?
Yes. In the default deployment with push notifications enabled, an unauthenticated caller can register a notification destination using an inline SendMessage configuration or CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig for an existing task.
What network targets can requests reach?
Requests can be sent from the server’s network position to loopback, private, link-local cloud-metadata, IPv6 unique-local, unspecified, or multicast destinations where routing permits. Direct POST delivery can send attacker-influenced task data to internal services.
Do redirects or hostname checks prevent exploitation?
No. JdkA2AHttpClient and VertxA2AHttpClient follow redirects, so a webhook redirect can bypass destination checks and turn a POST into a GET; hostname-only checks also do not prevent DNS rebinding.
Which versions need remediation?
Versions prior to 1.3.0.Final are affected. The vulnerable behavior stores configured URLs verbatim and does not validate destinations when creating task push-notification configurations.