CVE-2026-112188: MISP Server Settings Lookup Exposes Sensitive Configuration Data via Branch Name Resolution

Published Oct 19, 2026
·
Updated

MISP contains a vulnerability in its server settings lookup mechanism that allows an authenticated user to retrieve sensitive configuration data that should have been redacted.

The settings lookup function resolves a dotted setting name to a node in the configuration tree. When a branch name (such as Security, MISP, or Plugin) is supplied instead of a specific leaf setting, the function returns the entire sub-tree. Because a branch node does not carry a redaction flag, the redaction check in the settings retrieval endpoint is bypassed, and the full branch contents are returned to the caller. This exposes sensitive values including the security salt, Redis connection passwords, and plugin API keys.

A second endpoint that edits server settings similarly reads the entire configuration store when a branch name is resolved, returning all settings to the caller.

The impact is disclosure of sensitive server configuration secrets to any user who can access the server settings endpoints.

Affected versions: <2.5.48.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Misp Misp<2.5.48

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade MISP to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.5.48

Event History

Oct 19, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·09:22 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·09:22 AM
RemedyDescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·10:16 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Who can exploit this issue?

Any authenticated user who can access the server settings endpoints can retrieve sensitive configuration data. Exploitation does not require user interaction.

2

What information could be exposed?

Exposed branch contents can include the security salt, Redis connection passwords, and plugin API keys, along with other settings in the returned configuration subtree.

3

What input is required to trigger the disclosure?

The user supplies a branch name, such as Security, MISP, or Plugin, rather than a specific leaf setting. Resolving that name returns the full subtree and bypasses the leaf-level redaction check.

4

Are systems running the default configuration affected?

The provided data does not identify a configuration prerequisite. The issue affects vulnerable MISP versions when an authenticated user can access the relevant server settings endpoints.

5

Which versions are affected?

MISP versions earlier than 2.5.48 are affected.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203