CVE-2026-119190: Forge: X.509 basicConstraints bypass in verifyCertificateChain() via deprecated extension OIDs 2.5.29.10 and 2.5.29.13

Published Oct 29, 2026
·
Updated

Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge parsed deprecated extension OIDs 2.5.29.10 and 2.5.29.13 as basicConstraints, and pki.verifyCertificateChain() used the first extension with that name. Exploitation requires a CA trusted by the application to issue a certificate carrying an attacker-supplied deprecated-OID extension, commonly because the CA copies extensions from a certificate signing request. By placing a permissive deprecated extension before the genuine 2.5.29.19 basicConstraints extension, the certificate holder could have the certificate accepted as a CA and issue certificates for arbitrary names, enabling server or client impersonation. If the issuing CA adds a keyUsage extension without keyCertSign, node-forge rejects the chain. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade node-forge to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.4.1

Event History

Oct 29, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·07:25 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·07:25 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·08:17 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are realistically exposed?

Applications using node-forge versions before 1.4.1 are exposed when they trust a CA that can issue certificates containing an attacker-supplied deprecated extension OID, often because the CA copies extensions from certificate signing requests.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

The attacker needs a certificate issued by a CA trusted by the application and must be able to get a permissive extension using OID 2.5.29.10 or 2.5.29.13 placed before the genuine basicConstraints extension (OID 2.5.29.19). They can then use that certificate as a CA to issue certificates for arbitrary names.

3

Are certificates protected if the issuing CA sets keyUsage restrictions?

Yes, node-forge rejects the chain if the issuing CA adds a keyUsage extension that does not include keyCertSign. This restriction prevents the described chain-validation bypass.

4

What should be done if immediate patching is not possible?

Ensure trusted issuing CAs do not copy attacker-controlled certificate-request extensions into issued certificates, and require keyUsage restrictions that omit keyCertSign where appropriate. Upgrade to node-forge 1.4.1 when possible.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203