CVE-2026-119204: pypdf has possible large memory usage when parsing page tree

Published Oct 29, 2026
·
Updated

Impact

An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the page tree with many shared resources.

Patches

This has been fixed in pypdf==6.21.4.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #4290.

Other sources

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.21.4, pypdf can consume excessive memory while parsing a crafted PDF page tree containing many shared resources. Page-tree flattening copies page dictionary and inherited resource entries without a document-wide entry budget, allowing the crafted resource structure to cause disproportionate allocations. This issue is fixed in version 6.21.4.

— MITRE

Affected Software

7 affected componentsFixes available
debian/pypdf*
debian/pypdf*
debian/pypdf*
debian/pypdf2*
debian/pypdf<=3.4.1-1+deb12u1, <=5.4.0-1, <=6.21.1-1
debian/pypdf2<=2.12.1-3+deb12u1
pip/pypdf<6.21.4
6.21.4

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/pypdf to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 6.21.4
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade pypdf to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 6.21.4
  3. Compensating control

    If upgrading is not yet possible, apply the changes from pull request #4290.

Event History

Oct 29, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·08:34 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·08:34 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via OSV·08:34 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·09:17 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via OSV·09:17 PM
Affected Software
Oct 30, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·11:13 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·11:13 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are most exposed to this issue?

Deployments that parse attacker-controlled or otherwise untrusted PDF files with pypdf are exposed. The impact is excessive memory consumption, which can affect availability when a crafted PDF is processed.

2

What must an attacker provide to trigger the excessive memory use?

The attacker needs to supply a crafted PDF whose page tree has many shared resources. Triggering occurs when the application parses that page tree; no attacker privileges are indicated.

3

Is a configuration change required for exploitation?

No special configuration requirement is described. Affected pypdf versions parse the crafted page-tree structure in a way that can allocate disproportionate memory.

4

What can be done if upgrading is not immediately possible?

Consider applying the changes from PR #4290 as a workaround. The documented fixed release is pypdf 6.21.4.

5

How can teams determine whether they may be affected?

Check whether the application uses pypdf to parse PDFs and whether its installed version is earlier than 6.21.4. Prioritize systems that process PDFs from untrusted sources or permit users to upload PDF files.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203