CVE-2026-121425: Nodemailer: A ";" inside a quoted string or comment ends an address group early in addressparser, turning display text into a recipient
Vulnerability summary
addressparser ends an RFC 5322 group at the first ;, including one inside a quoted display name or a comment. The text after it is parsed again as top level recipients with the quoting flipped, so text that every conformant parser reads as a display name or comment becomes a live address. G: (a; <evil@evil.com>) <v@victim.com>; names only v@victim.com, and Nodemailer read it as the single recipient evil@evil.com. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of an address field that an application passes to Nodemailer, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 group that conformant parsers accept without defects.
Realistic exploitation scenario
An application validates the recipients of a submitted address list with a conformant parser and only allows addresses at its own domain. The attacker submits G: (a; <evil@evil.com>) <v@victim.com>;. The validator sees one mailbox, v@victim.com, and approves it. Nodemailer delivers to evil@evil.com only. The same works through a quoted display name, G: "a;" "<evil@evil.com>" <v@victim.com>;. The boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list.
Proof of concept
js const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser'); console.log(addressparser("G: (a; <evil@evil.com>) <v@victim.com>;")); // [ { name: 'G', group: [ [Object] ] }, { address: 'evil@evil.com', name: ') v@victim.com' } ]
Python's email.headervalueparser.getaddresslist reads the same value as the single mailbox v@victim.com, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "G: (a; <evil@evil.com>) <v@victim.com>;" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Security impact
Mail that an application intends for an approved recipient goes to a recipient chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content, and the intended recipient never receives it. The misreading only occurs on values a conformant validator approves, so correct validation is bypassed, which makes it a security issue rather than a parsing bug. Affected are applications that pass user influenced address lists to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix tracks quoted strings and comments inside a group and reads only a ; outside them.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Other sources
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.1.4 contains a parsing flaw in addressparser that ends an RFC 5322 group at a semicolon inside quoted display names or comments. Attackers can submit crafted group addresses that conformant validators approve, redirecting mail to attacker-chosen recipients and bypassing recipient allow lists.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.4 - Upgrade
Upgrade
debian/node-nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.7+~8.0.2-1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.4
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Nodemailer versions are affected?
Nodemailer versions 3.0.0 through 10.1.3 are affected.
Which application workflows are realistically exposed?
Applications that pass attacker-controlled address-field text to Nodemailer are exposed, especially when they validate recipients with a conformant parser and restrict approved addresses to an allowed domain. Inbound message headers parsed with mailparser are also within the attacker capability described.
What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?
The attacker needs control of an address field supplied to the application or an inbound message header parsed by mailparser. No application access, configuration access, or credentials are required.
Is public exploit information available?
Yes. An exploit was published on 2026-11-03, and the issue is flagged as having a proof of concept.