CVE-2026-121426: Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not name
Vulnerability summary
addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first > it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that >. <"a@evil.com>"@good.com> is the mailbox "a@evil.com>"@good.com under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at evil.com. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.
Realistic exploitation scenario
An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits <"a@evil.com>"@good.com>, which validates as a good.com mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com> and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees.
Proof of concept
js const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser'); console.log(addressparser("<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>")); // [ { address: '"a@evil.com', name: '@good.com>' } ]
Python's email.headervalueparser.getaddresslist reads the same value as "a@evil.com>"@good.com, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Security impact
Mail that an application intends for an allowed domain is delivered to a domain chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content. It is a security vulnerability rather than a parsing bug because the misreading only occurs for values that a conformant validator approves, so validation done the right way is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix tracks quoted strings, comments and domain literals inside an angle-addr and reads only a > outside them.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Other sources
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.1.4 contains an address parsing vulnerability in addressparser that ends an angle-addr at a '>' inside a quoted local part, comment or domain literal. Attackers can submit addresses that validate as an allowed domain but are delivered to an attacker-controlled domain, bypassing recipient allow lists and disclosing message content.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.4 - Upgrade
Upgrade
debian/node-nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.7+~8.0.2-1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Nodemailerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 10.1.4
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which applications are realistically exposed?
Applications are exposed when an attacker can control recipient or sender address text passed to Nodemailer, such as contact or invitation forms. Inbound message headers parsed with mailparser can also provide attacker-controlled address input.
Does exploitation require an account or access to application configuration?
No. The attacker only needs to supply a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address; no application access, credentials, or configuration access is required.
How can this bypass recipient-domain restrictions?
An application may validate <"a@evil.com>"@good.com> as a mailbox at good.com, while Nodemailer interprets it as an address at evil.com. This can cause delivery to a domain that was not named by the application's validation logic.
Which Nodemailer versions need remediation?
Nodemailer versions 3.0.0 through 10.1.3 are affected. Review deployments of the npm package and distribution packages identified as ubuntu/node-nodemailer and debian/node-nodemailer.
How can teams look for attempted exploitation?
Review attacker-controlled sender and recipient address inputs for angle-address forms where a quoted local part contains a greater-than character, such as <"a@evil.com>"@good.com>. The issue can also be triggered by a greater-than character inside a comment or domain literal.