CVE-2026-125336: Forge: X.509 nameConstraints not enforced by verifyCertificateChain()

Published Nov 10, 2026
·
Updated

Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.3, pki.verifyCertificateChain() in lib/x509.js does not decode or enforce the X.509 nameConstraints extension while validating certificate paths. A name-constrained certificate authority with a non-critical extension can therefore issue a leaf certificate with a subjectAltName dNSName or subject commonName outside a permitted subtree or inside an excluded subtree, and node-forge accepts the chain. Exploitation requires a name-constrained CA that chains to a trusted root and either its private key or the ability to obtain an out-of-scope certificate, allowing impersonation of names outside the delegated namespace, including against forge.tls clients. Chains without nameConstraints are not affected, and affected versions safely reject critical nameConstraints as unsupported rather than accepting them. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.3.

Affected Software

1 affected component
npm/node-forge<1.4.3

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade node-forge to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.4.3

Event History

Nov 10, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:52 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:52 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·07:21 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are actually exposed?

Deployments using Forge/node-forge versions prior to 1.4.3 are affected only when they validate a chain containing a CA with a non-critical X.509 nameConstraints extension. Chains without nameConstraints are not affected, and critical nameConstraints are safely rejected as unsupported.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

An attacker needs a name-constrained CA that chains to a trusted root, plus either that CA's private key or the ability to obtain an out-of-scope certificate from it. They can then present a certificate for a name outside the permitted subtree or within an excluded subtree, enabling impersonation against clients such as forge.tls clients.

3

How can I remediate the issue?

Upgrade Forge/node-forge to version 1.4.3, which fixes the missing decoding and enforcement of nameConstraints during certificate-path validation.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203