CVE-2026-15460: Missing channel-state validation in Zephyr Bluetooth Classic L2CAP receive path

Published Sep 9, 2026
·
Updated

The Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) L2CAP receive handler btl2capbrrecv() in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/l2capbr.c dispatched inbound data PDUs based only on the destination channel ID, without checking that the target channel had reached the BTL2CAPCONNECTED state. A dynamic channel is assigned its RX CID and added to the connection's channel list while still in BTL2CAPCONNECTING (and later BTL2CAPCONFIG) — before configuration completes and, for PSMs that require security, before the peer is authenticated (l2capbrconnreq()).

Because the channel is already findable by btl2capbrlookuprxcid() during this window, a remote peer within radio range can send a data PDU addressed to that CID and have it processed on a not-yet-established channel. The dispatch keys off channel fields (BRCHAN(chan)->rx.mode, rx.mps) that are only initialized during configuration by l2capbrconf(); since channel objects are pooled and btl2capbrchandel() does not reset rx.mode or the reassembly buffer sdu, a reused channel can carry stale state into the CONNECTING window and route the frame into the retransmission/flow-control path (btl2capbrretfcrecv()) with stale parameters and a possibly stale sdu pointer.

The impact is delivery of attacker data to upper-layer protocol handlers on a half-open (and possibly unauthenticated) channel, plus operation on stale or partially initialized channel state on reused channel objects — leading to channel/link teardown (denial of service) and, in the stale-sdu case, a dangling-pointer condition. The fix adds an explicit BRCHAN(chan)->state < BTL2CAPCONNECTED guard that drops any data received before the channel is fully connected.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Zephyr Project Zephyr Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) L2CAP (bt_l2cap_br)

Event History

Sep 9, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:40 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:40 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Who can attempt to exploit this issue?

A remote Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) peer within radio range can attempt exploitation. The reported vector requires no attacker privileges or user interaction.

2

What timing does an attacker need to target?

The attacker must send a data PDU to a dynamic channel's assigned receive CID while the channel is still connecting or being configured, before it reaches the connected state. For PSMs requiring security, this window can occur before peer authentication completes.

3

Why can reused channels increase the impact?

Channel objects are pooled, and channel deletion does not reset the receive mode or reassembly buffer. A reused channel can therefore retain stale receive parameters during the connecting window and direct an inbound frame into the retransmission/flow-control receive path.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203