CVE-2026-19033: Unauthenticated IXFR deltas are applied to the live zone before TSIG verification

Published Sep 16, 2026
·
Updated

For a secondary zone with transfers restricted by TSIG, named may start to serve the data provided in a zone transfer before the final message with the TSIG signature arrives. This could allow an attacker that does not actually possess a valid TSIG signature to send unauthorized zone contents to a secondary server. Although no TSIG signature ever arrives, named does not rollback to the pre-transfer state. To exploit the vulnerability, the transfer must be a multi-message TCP IXFR, as described by RFC 8945. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Internet Systems Consortium BIND 9>=9.11.0<=9.18.50, >=9.20.0<=9.20.27, >=9.21.0<=9.21.25, >=9.11.3-S1<=9.18.50-S1, >=9.20.9-S1<=9.20.27-S1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.20.29
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.21.26
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.20.29-S1

Event History

Sep 16, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·02:10 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·02:10 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to this issue?

Secondary BIND 9 zones that restrict transfers with TSIG are exposed if they run an affected version and can receive a multi-message TCP IXFR. Primary-only deployments and transfers that do not use this IXFR pattern are not described as affected.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit it?

An attacker must be able to send a multi-message TCP IXFR to the secondary server. They do not need to possess a valid TSIG signature, because the server may apply and serve transfer data before the final TSIG-bearing message is received.

3

What is the impact if exploitation succeeds?

The secondary server may serve unauthorized zone contents supplied during the transfer. If the expected TSIG signature never arrives, named does not roll the zone back to its pre-transfer state.

4

What versions require remediation?

Affected versions are 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. The provided references include BIND 9.20.29 and 9.21.26 releases.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203