CVE-2026-1965: bad reuse of HTTP Negotiate connection

Published Mar 11, 2026
·
Updated

bad reuse of HTTP Negotiate connection

Other sources

libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request.

libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead.

When reusing a connection a range of criterion must first be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different credentials. One underlying reason being that Negotiate sometimes authenticates connections and not requests, contrary to how HTTP is designed to work.

An application that allows Negotiate authentication to a server (that responds wanting Negotiate) with user1:password1 and then does another operation to the same server also using Negotiate but with user2:password2 (while the previous connection is still alive) - the second request wrongly reused the same connection and since it then sees that the Negotiate negotiation is already made, it just sends the request over that connection thinking it uses the user2 credentials when it is in fact still using the connection authenticated for user1...

The set of authentication methods to use is set with CURLOPTHTTPAUTH.

Applications can disable libcurl's reuse of connections and thus mitigate this problem, by using one of the following libcurl options to alter how connections are or are not reused: CURLOPTFRESHCONNECT, CURLOPTMAXCONNECTS and CURLMOPTMAXHOSTCONNECTIONS (if using the curlmulti API).

MITRE

Affected Software

5 affected componentsFixes available
redhat/libcurl
haxx curl>=7.10.6<8.19.0
Microsoft azl3 curl 8.11.1-5
Microsoft azl3 curl 8.11.1-6
Microsoft cbl2 curl 8.8.0-8

Remediation

Event History

Mar 11, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:08 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:08 AM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:15 AM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Mar 12, 2026
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
DescriptionSeverity
Updated
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
Affected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-1965?

CVE-2026-1965 is considered a moderate severity vulnerability due to potential unauthorized access from incorrect connection reuse.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-1965?

To fix CVE-2026-1965, you should upgrade your version of libcurl to the latest release that addresses this vulnerability.

3

What applications are affected by CVE-2026-1965?

CVE-2026-1965 primarily affects applications that use the redhat/libcurl library for handling HTTP requests.

4

What kind of attacks can CVE-2026-1965 lead to?

CVE-2026-1965 can potentially enable attackers to perform authentication bypass and other security breaches due to connection mismanagement.

5

Is CVE-2026-1965 easy to exploit?

Exploitation of CVE-2026-1965 may vary depending on the implementation but generally requires specific conditions related to Negotiate authentication.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203