CVE-2026-23321: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always mark signal+subflow endp as used
Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning:
msk->pm.localaddrused == 0 WARNING: net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1071 at marksubflowendpavailable net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1071 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 WARNING: net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1071 at mptcpnlremovesubflowandsignaladdr net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1103 [inline], CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 WARNING: net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1071 at mptcppmnldeladdrdoit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1210, CPU#1: syz.2.17/961 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 961 Comm: syz.2.17 Not tainted 6.19.0-08368-gfafda3b4b06b #22 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1build1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:marksubflowendpavailable net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1071 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcpnlremovesubflowandsignaladdr net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1103 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcppmnldeladdrdoit+0x81d/0x8f0 net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1210 Code: 89 c5 e8 46 30 6f fe e9 21 fd ff ff 49 83 ed 80 e8 38 30 6f fe 4c 89 ef be 03 00 00 00 e8 db 49 df fe eb ac e8 24 30 6f fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 1d ff ff ff e8 16 30 6f fe eb 05 e8 0f 30 6f fe e8 9a RSP: 0018:ffffc90001663880 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff82de1a6c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88800722b500 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff8880158b22d0 R08: 0000000000010425 R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffffffff82de18ba R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88800641a640 R13: ffff8880158b1880 R14: ffff88801ec3c900 R15: ffff88800641a650 FS: 00005555722c3500(0000) GS:ffff8880f909d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f66346e0f60 CR3: 000000001607c000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> genlfamilyrcvmsgdoit+0x117/0x180 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 genlfamilyrcvmsg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline] genlrcvmsg+0x3a8/0x3f0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210 netlinkrcvskb+0x16d/0x240 net/netlink/afnetlink.c:2550 genlrcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219 netlinkunicastkernel net/netlink/afnetlink.c:1318 [inline] netlinkunicast+0x3e9/0x4c0 net/netlink/afnetlink.c:1344 netlinksendmsg+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/netlink/afnetlink.c:1894 socksendmsgnosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] socksendmsg+0xc9/0xf0 net/socket.c:742 syssendmsg+0x272/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2592 syssendmsg+0x2de/0x320 net/socket.c:2646 syssendmsg net/socket.c:2678 [inline] dosyssendmsg net/socket.c:2683 [inline] sesyssendmsg net/socket.c:2681 [inline] x64syssendmsg+0x110/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2681 dosyscallx64 arch/x86/entry/syscall64.c:63 [inline] dosyscall64+0x143/0x440 arch/x86/entry/syscall64.c:94 entrySYSCALL64afterhwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f66346f826d Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc83d8bdc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIGRAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6634985fa0 RCX: 00007f66346f826d RDX: 00000000040000b0 RSI: 0000200000000740 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6634985fa8 R13: 00007f6634985fac R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001770 </TASK>
The actions that caused that seem to be:
- Set the MPTCP subflows limit to 0 - Create an MPTCP endpoint with both the 'signal' and 'subflow' flags - Create a new MPTCP connection from a different address: an ADDADDR linked to the MPTCP endpoint will be sent ('signal' flag), but no subflows is initiated ('subflow' flag) - Remove the MPTCP endpoint
---truncated---
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What level of access does an attacker need?
Exploitation requires local access and low privileges. No user interaction is required.
What is the likely impact?
The CVSS vector indicates an availability impact only, with no confidentiality or integrity impact. The reported condition is a kernel warning in the MPTCP in-kernel path manager during address and subflow removal.
Which systems are most relevant to triage?
Linux systems using the kernel's in-kernel MPTCP path manager are relevant. The issue is associated with operations that remove MPTCP subflows and signaled addresses through the MPTCP netlink path.
How can I identify whether this condition has occurred?
Check kernel logs for a WARNING at net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1071, involving __mark_subflow_endp_available, mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr, or mptcp_pm_nl_del_addr_doit. The warning indicates msk->pm.local_addr_used was zero during the affected operation.