CVE-2026-28791: Path Traversal in Media Upload Handle in Tina
Affected Package
| Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Package | @tinacms/cli | | Version | 2.0.5 (latest at time of discovery) | | Vulnerable File | packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts | | Vulnerable Lines | 42-43 |
---
Summary
A path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) exists in the TinaCMS development server's media upload handler. The code at media.ts:42-43 joins user-controlled path segments using path.join() without validating that the resulting path stays within the intended media directory. This allows writing files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem.
Attack Vector: Network (HTTP POST request) Impact: Arbitrary file write, potential Remote Code Execution
---
Details
Vulnerable Code Location
File: packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts Lines: 42-43
typescript bb.on('file', async (name, file, info) => { const fullPath = decodeURI(req.url?.slice('/media/upload/'.length)); // Line 42 const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/')); // Line 43 // make sure the directory exists before writing the file await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo)); file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo)); });
Root Cause
The path.join() function resolves .. (parent directory) segments in the path. When the user-supplied path contains traversal sequences like ../../../etc/passwd, these are resolved relative to the media folder, allowing escape to arbitrary filesystem locations.
Example: javascript const mediaFolder = '/app/public/uploads'; const maliciousInput = '../../../tmp/evil.txt'; const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...maliciousInput.split('/')); // Result: '/tmp/evil.txt' - OUTSIDE the media folder!
Additional Affected Endpoints
The same vulnerability pattern exists in:
1. Delete Handler (handleDelete, lines 29-33) - Arbitrary file deletion 2. List Handler (handleList, lines 16-27) + MediaModel.listMedia - Directory enumeration 3. MediaModel.deleteMedia (lines 201-217) - Arbitrary file deletion
Similar code also exists in the Express version at: - packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/routes/index.ts - packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/models/media.ts
---
PoC
Quick Verification (No Server Required)
This Node.js script directly tests the vulnerable code logic:
javascript #!/usr/bin/env node / TinaCMS Path Traversal Vulnerability - Direct Code Test Run: node test-vulnerability.js /
const path = require('path'); const fs = require('fs');
// Simulated configuration (matches typical TinaCMS setup) const rootPath = '/tmp/tinacms-test'; const publicFolder = 'public'; const mediaRoot = 'uploads'; const mediaFolder = path.join(rootPath, publicFolder, mediaRoot);
// Setup test directories fs.mkdirSync(path.join(rootPath, publicFolder, mediaRoot), { recursive: true }); fs.mkdirSync('/tmp/target-dir', { recursive: true });
console.log(Media folder: ${mediaFolder});
// Simulate vulnerable code from media.ts:42-43 function vulnerableUpload(reqUrl) { const fullPath = decodeURI(reqUrl.slice('/media/upload/'.length)); const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/')); return saveTo; }
// Test cases const tests = [ { url: '/media/upload/image.png', desc: 'Normal upload' }, { url: '/media/upload/../../../tmp/target-dir/evil.txt', desc: 'Path traversal' }, ];
tests.forEach(test => { const result = vulnerableUpload(test.url); const isVuln = !path.resolve(result).startsWith(path.resolve(mediaFolder)); console.log(\n${test.desc}:); console.log( Input: ${test.url}); console.log( Result: ${result}); console.log( Vulnerable: ${isVuln ? 'YES ⚠️' : 'No ✓'}); if (isVuln) { // Actually write the file to prove it works fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(result), { recursive: true }); fs.writeFileSync(result, PWNED at ${new Date().toISOString()}); console.log( File written: ${fs.existsSync(result)}); } });
// Cleanup fs.rmSync(rootPath, { recursive: true, force: true });
Output
Media folder: /tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads
Normal upload: Input: /media/upload/image.png Result: /tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads/image.png Vulnerable: No ✓
Path traversal: Input: /media/upload/../../../tmp/target-dir/evil.txt Result: /tmp/tmp/target-dir/evil.txt Vulnerable: YES ⚠️ File written: true
The file was successfully written to /tmp/tmp/target-dir/evil.txt, which is completely outside the intended media folder at /tmp/tinacms-test/public/uploads.
Important Note: HTTP Layer vs Code Vulnerability
I want to be transparent about my findings:
What I observed: - When testing via HTTP requests against the Vite dev server, path traversal sequences (../) are normalized by Node.js/Vite's HTTP layer before reaching the vulnerable code - This means direct HTTP exploitation like curl POST /media/upload/../../../tmp/evil.txt is mitigated in the default configuration
Why this is still a valid vulnerability that should be fixed:
1. The code itself has no validation - If the path reaches the handler (via any vector), it will be exploited 2. Defense-in-depth principle - Security should not rely solely on HTTP normalization 3. Inconsistent protection - Your GraphQL layer (addPendingDocument) explicitly validates paths and rejects ../ (see test at packages/@tinacms/graphql/tests/pending-document-validation/index.test.ts:59), but the media endpoints don't have equivalent protection 4. Different deployment contexts: - Reverse proxies (nginx, Apache) with proxypass may preserve raw paths - Custom server configurations - Future refactoring that uses this code differently 5. The parseMediaFolder helper (line 66-74) shows intent to restrict paths - the upload handler should have similar restrictions 6. Express version also affected - packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/routes/index.ts has the same pattern
---
Evidence That Path Traversal Should Be Blocked
Your codebase already shows that path traversal is considered a security issue:
typescript // From: packages/@tinacms/graphql/tests/pending-document-validation/index.test.ts:52-70 it('handles validation error for invalid path format', async () => { const { query } = await setupMutation(dirname, config);
const invalidPathMutation = mutation { addPendingDocument( collection: "post" relativePath: "../invalid-path.md" // <-- Path traversal is rejected! ) { typename } } ;
const result = await query({ query: invalidPathMutation, variables: {} });
expect(result.errors).toBeDefined(); expect(result.errors?.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); });
This test explicitly verifies that ../invalid-path.md is rejected in the GraphQL layer. The media upload endpoints should have the same protection.
---
Impact
Who is Affected
- Developers running TinaCMS in development mode - Any deployment exposing the TinaCMS dev server API - Particularly concerning if dev servers are exposed to networks (common for mobile testing)
Potential Attack Scenarios
1. Remote Code Execution: Write malicious files to executable locations - Overwrite ~/.ssh/authorizedkeys for SSH access - Modify application source code - Create cron jobs or systemd services
2. Denial of Service: Delete critical application or system files
3. Information Disclosure: List directory contents outside the media folder
CVSS Score Estimate
CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 8.1 (High) - Attack Vector: Network (AV:N) - Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L) - Privileges Required: None (PR:N) - User Interaction: None (UI:N) - Scope: Unchanged (S:U) - Confidentiality: None (C:N) - Integrity: High (I:H) - Availability: High (A:H)
---
Recommended Fix
Add path validation to ensure the resolved path stays within the media directory:
typescript import path from 'path';
const handlePost = async function (req, res) { const bb = busboy({ headers: req.headers });
bb.on('file', async (name, file, info) => { const fullPath = decodeURI(req.url?.slice('/media/upload/'.length)); const saveTo = path.join(mediaFolder, ...fullPath.split('/'));
// ✅ SECURITY FIX: Validate path stays within media folder const resolvedPath = path.resolve(saveTo); const resolvedMediaFolder = path.resolve(mediaFolder);
if (!resolvedPath.startsWith(resolvedMediaFolder + path.sep)) { res.statusCode = 403; res.end(JSON.stringify({ error: 'Invalid file path' })); return; }
await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo)); file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo)); }); // ... rest of handler };
The same fix should be applied to: - handleDelete function - handleList function - MediaModel.listMedia method - MediaModel.deleteMedia method - Express router in packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/
Alternative: Create a Validation Helper
typescript function validateMediaPath(userPath: string, mediaFolder: string): string { const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(mediaFolder, ...userPath.split('/'))); const resolvedBase = path.resolve(mediaFolder); if (!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep) && resolved !== resolvedBase) { throw new Error('Path traversal detected'); } return resolved; }
---
References
- CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') - OWASP Path Traversal - Node.js path.join() Documentation - OWASP Testing Guide - Path Traversal
Other sources
Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to 2.1.7, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the TinaCMS development server's media upload handler. The code at media.ts joins user-controlled path segments using path.join() without validating that the resulting path stays within the intended media directory. This allows writing files to arbitrary locations on the filesystem. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.7.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-28791?
The severity of CVE-2026-28791 is considered to be moderate due to its potential for unauthorized access to the file system.
How do I fix CVE-2026-28791?
To fix CVE-2026-28791, upgrade TinaCMS to version 2.1.7 or later, where the vulnerability has been addressed.
What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-28791?
CVE-2026-28791 is a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to access unintended files and directories.
Which versions of TinaCMS are affected by CVE-2026-28791?
CVE-2026-28791 affects all versions of TinaCMS prior to 2.1.7.
What can happen if CVE-2026-28791 is exploited?
If exploited, CVE-2026-28791 could allow an attacker to read sensitive files on the server, leading to potential data leakage.