CVE-2026-31392: smb: client: fix krb5 mount with username option
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix krb5 mount with username option
Customer reported that some of their krb5 mounts were failing against a single server as the client was trying to mount the shares with wrong credentials. It turned out the client was reusing SMB session from first mount to try mounting the other shares, even though a different username= option had been specified to the other mounts.
By using username mount option along with sec=krb5 to search for principals from keytab is supported by cifs.upcall(8) since cifs-utils-4.8. So fix this by matching username mount option in matchsession() even with Kerberos.
For example, the second mount below should fail with -ENOKEY as there is no 'foobar' principal in keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab). The client ends up reusing SMB session from first mount to perform the second one, which is wrong.
$ ktutil ktutil: addentry -password -p testuser -k 1 -e aes256-cts Password for testuser@ZELDA.TEST: ktutil: writekt /etc/krb5.keytab ktutil: quit $ klist -ke Keytab name: FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab KVNO Principal ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 testuser@ZELDA.TEST (aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96) $ mount.cifs //w22-root2/scratch /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,username=testuser $ mount.cifs //w22-root2/scratch /mnt/2 -o sec=krb5,username=foobar $ mount -t cifs | grep -Po 'username=\K\w+' testuser testuser
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
debian/linuxto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.1.176-1Fixed in 6.1.190-1Fixed in 6.12.107-1Fixed in 6.12.113-1Fixed in 7.2.12-1Fixed in 7.2.13-1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-aws-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.64~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-azure-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1063.71~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-azure-fde-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-gcp-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1064.72~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-hwe-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-ibm-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.62~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136.2~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-nvidia-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1059.62~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-oracle-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1058.61~22.04.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-riscv-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136~22.04.3 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-realtime-6.8to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.1-1056.57~22.04.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linuxto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-awsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.64 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-azureto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1063.71 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-azure-fdeto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1062.69 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-gcpto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1064.72 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-gketo a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1059.67 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-gkeopto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1046.50 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-ibmto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.62 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-lowlatencyto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-nvidiato a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1059.62 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-nvidia-lowlatencyto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1059.62.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-nvidia-tegrato a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1030.31 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-oracleto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1058.61 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-raspito a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.65 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-xilinxto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1033.34 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-bluefieldto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1028.33 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-raspi-realtimeto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-2050.52 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-realtimeto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.1-1056.57 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-aws-fipsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1061.64+fips1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-azure-fipsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1063.71+fips2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-fipsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-136.136+fips2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
ubuntu/linux-gcp-fipsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.8.0-1064.72+fips1
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which systems are exposed to this issue?
Systems using the Linux kernel SMB client are affected when they mount SMB shares with sec=krb5 and specify username= options. The issue arises when separate mounts use different usernames, because the client can reuse the SMB session established by an earlier mount.
What is the practical impact of the incorrect session reuse?
A mount requesting a different Kerberos username can be performed using credentials from the first SMB session instead. For example, a mount for a username with no corresponding principal in /etc/krb5.keytab should fail with -ENOKEY, but the vulnerable client may reuse an existing session rather than failing as expected.
How can an administrator identify potentially affected mount behavior?
Review SMB mounts using both sec=krb5 and username=, particularly where multiple mounts to the same server specify different usernames. A warning sign is that a mount succeeds even though the requested username has no principal in the keytab and should therefore return -ENOKEY.