CVE-2026-33343: etcd: Nested etcd transactions bypass RBAC authorization checks

Published Mar 20, 2026
·
Updated

Impact What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

An authenticated user with RBAC restricted permissions on key ranges can use nested transactions to bypass all key-level authorization. This allows any authenticated user with direct access to etcd to effectively ignore all key range restrictions, accessing the entire etcd data store. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected.

Patches Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

This vulnerability is patched in the following versions:

etcd 3.6.9 etcd 3.5.28 etcd 3.4.42

Workarounds Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.

restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution

Reporters Our community helps keep etcd secure

SIG-Etcd thanks community members Luke Francis and Battulga Byambaa for reporting this vulnerability.

Other sources

etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, an authenticated user with RBAC restricted permissions on key ranges can use nested transactions to bypass all key-level authorization. This allows any authenticated user with direct access to etcd to effectively ignore all key range restrictions, accessing the entire etcd data store. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.

— NVD

etcd: Nested etcd transactions bypass RBAC authorization checks

— Microsoft

Affected Software

11 affected componentsFixes available
go/go.etcd.io/etcd<=3.3.27
go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3<=3.4.41
3.4.42
go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3>=3.5.0-alpha.0<=3.5.27
3.5.28
go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3>=3.6.0-alpha.0<=3.6.8
3.6.9
Microsoft azl3 etcd 3.5.21-1
Etcd Etcd<3.4.42
Etcd Etcd>=3.5.0<3.5.28
Etcd Etcd>=3.6.0<3.6.9
Microsoft cbl2 etcd 3.5.21-4
alpine/etcd>=3.5.0<3.6.10-r0
3.6.10-r0
alpine/etcd>=3.5.0<3.6.10-r0
3.6.10-r0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.4.42
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.5.28
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.6.9
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade alpine/etcd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.6.10-r0
  5. Upgrade

    Upgrade etcd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.4.42
  6. Upgrade

    Upgrade etcd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.5.28
  7. Upgrade

    Upgrade etcd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.6.9
  8. Compensating control

    Require strong client identity at the etcd transport layer, such as mutual TLS (mTLS) with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.

  9. Compensating control

    Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect.

  10. Compensating control

    If upgrading is not immediately possible, treat the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice.

Event History

Mar 20, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:34 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:34 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
Mar 26, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·01:23 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·01:23 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·02:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Data Sourced
via OSV·02:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Mar 28, 2026
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203