CVE-2026-33679: Vikunja has SSRF via OpenID Connect Avatar Download that Bypasses Webhook SSRF Protections
Summary
The DownloadImage function in pkg/utils/avatar.go uses a bare http.Client{} with no SSRF protection when downloading user avatar images from the OpenID Connect picture claim URL. An attacker who controls their OIDC profile picture URL can force the Vikunja server to make HTTP GET requests to arbitrary internal or cloud metadata endpoints. This bypasses the SSRF protections that are correctly applied to the webhook system.
Details
When a user authenticates via OpenID Connect, Vikunja extracts the picture claim from the ID token or UserInfo endpoint and passes it to syncUserAvatarFromOpenID, which calls utils.DownloadImage with the attacker-controlled URL:
Claim extraction (pkg/modules/auth/openid/openid.go:70-78): go type claims struct { Email string json:"email" Name string json:"name" PreferredUsername string json:"preferredusername" Nickname string json:"nickname" VikunjaGroups []map[string]interface{} json:"vikunjagroups" Picture string json:"picture" // ... }
Avatar sync trigger (pkg/modules/auth/openid/openid.go:348-352): go // Try sync avatar if available err = syncUserAvatarFromOpenID(s, u, cl.Picture) if err != nil { log.Errorf("Error syncing avatar for user %s: %v", u.Username, err) }
Vulnerable download (pkg/utils/avatar.go:94-115): go func DownloadImage(url string) ([]byte, error) { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 3time.Second) defer cancel()
req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodGet, url, nil) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create HTTP request: %w", err) }
resp, err := (&http.Client{}).Do(req) // No SSRF protection // ... return io.ReadAll(resp.Body) // No size limit }
In contrast, the webhook system correctly applies SSRF protection (pkg/models/webhooks.go:306-310): go if !config.WebhooksAllowNonRoutableIPs.GetBool() { guardian := ssrf.New(ssrf.WithAnyPort()) transport.DialContext = (&net.Dialer{ Control: guardian.Safe, }).DialContext }
The avatar download path has none of this protection. There is no URL scheme validation, no IP address filtering, and no response body size limit.
PoC
Prerequisites: A Vikunja instance with OpenID Connect configured (e.g., Keycloak, Authentik). Attacker has an account on the OIDC provider.
Step 1: Set up a listener to observe incoming requests: bash On attacker-controlled server or internal service nc -lvp 8888
Step 2: In the OIDC provider (e.g., Keycloak admin), update the attacker's user profile picture URL to an internal address: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ Or to probe internal services: http://internal-service:8888/admin
Step 3: Log in to Vikunja via the OIDC provider. After the callback completes, the Vikunja server will make a GET request from its own network context to the URL set in the picture claim.
Step 4: Observe the request arriving at the internal endpoint or listener. The request originates from the Vikunja server's IP, bypassing any network-level access controls that allow Vikunja server traffic.
Cloud metadata example (AWS): Set picture URL to: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
Vikunja server makes GET to this URL from its own network context The response is read into memory (io.ReadAll) before image.Decode fails The HTTP request itself reaches the metadata service
Impact
- Cloud metadata access: Attacker can reach cloud instance metadata services (AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254, GCP, Azure equivalents) from the Vikunja server's network position, potentially leaking IAM credentials, instance identity tokens, and configuration data. - Internal network reconnaissance: Port scanning and service discovery of internal hosts reachable from the Vikunja server by observing response timing and error messages. - Internal service interaction: Any internal service that acts on GET requests (cache purges, status endpoints, admin panels) can be triggered. - Memory pressure: The io.ReadAll call with no size limit means pointing the URL at a large resource could cause memory exhaustion on the Vikunja server, though the 3-second timeout partially mitigates this. - Repeated exploitation: The SSRF triggers on every OIDC login, allowing the attacker to iterate through different internal URLs by updating their OIDC profile between logins.
Recommended Fix
Apply the same SSRF protection used in webhooks to DownloadImage, and add a response body size limit:
go // pkg/utils/avatar.go import ( "net" "code.dny.dev/ssrf" )
func DownloadImage(url string) ([]byte, error) { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 3time.Second) defer cancel()
req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodGet, url, nil) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create HTTP request: %w", err) }
// SSRF protection: block requests to non-globally-routable IPs guardian := ssrf.New(ssrf.WithAnyPort()) client := &http.Client{ Transport: &http.Transport{ DialContext: (&net.Dialer{ Control: guardian.Safe, }).DialContext, }, }
resp, err := client.Do(req) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to download image: %w", err) } defer resp.Body.Close()
if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to download image, status code: %d", resp.StatusCode) }
// Limit response body to 10MB to prevent memory exhaustion const maxAvatarSize = 10 1024 1024 return io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(resp.Body, maxAvatarSize)) }
Other sources
Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to version 2.2.1, the DownloadImage function in pkg/utils/avatar.go uses a bare http.Client{} with no SSRF protection when downloading user avatar images from the OpenID Connect picture claim URL. An attacker who controls their OIDC profile picture URL can force the Vikunja server to make HTTP GET requests to arbitrary internal or cloud metadata endpoints. This bypasses the SSRF protections that are correctly applied to the webhook system. Version 2.2.1 patches the issue.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-33679?
CVE-2026-33679 is classified as a medium severity vulnerability due to its SSRF impact on Vikunja prior to version 2.2.1.
How do I fix CVE-2026-33679?
To mitigate CVE-2026-33679, upgrade Vikunja to version 2.2.2 or later.
What systems are affected by CVE-2026-33679?
CVE-2026-33679 affects Vikunja versions prior to 2.2.1.
What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-33679?
CVE-2026-33679 is an SSRF vulnerability that allows for OpenID Connect Avatar Download bypassing existing webhook protections.
Can I still use Vikunja if I have CVE-2026-33679?
You should not use Vikunja versions prior to 2.2.2 as they are vulnerable to CVE-2026-33679.