CVE-2026-34377: Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

Published Mar 30, 2026
·
Updated

---

CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data

Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. To be clear, this would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes.

Severity High - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.

Affected Versions All Zebra versions supporting V5 transactions (Network Upgrade 5 and later) prior to version 4.3.0.

Description The vulnerability exists in the findverifiedunminedtx function within transaction.rs. This function was designed to optimize block verification by checking if a transaction was already verified in the mempool.

The lookup mechanism used the ZIP-244 txid as the unique key. However, for V5 transactions, the txid specifically excludes the Authorization Data Root (signatures and proofs). Because Zebra returned a "verified" status based solely on the txid, it skipped the essential checkv5auth() call for the transaction version provided in the block.

An attacker (specifically a malicious miner) could exploit this by: 1. Observing a valid V5 transaction broadcast to the network and entering a Zebra node's mempool. 2. Creating a block containing a modified version of that transaction. The modified version has the same txid but contains invalid signatures or proofs. 3. The affected Zebra node identifies the txid in its mempool and incorrectly assumes the block's version of the transaction is already verified. 4. The node commits the block with the invalid transaction data. 5. Other nodes (like zcashd or zebra nodes without that transaction in their mempool) reject the block, resulting in a chain fork where the poisoned Zebra node is isolated.

Impact Consensus Failure Attack Vector: Network (specifically via a malicious miner). Effect: Network partition/consensus split. Scope: Any Zebra node utilizing the transaction verification cache optimization for V5 transactions.

Fixed Versions This issue is fixed in Zebra 4.3.0.

The fix ensures that verification is only skipped if the transaction's full integrity—including authorization data—is validated against the mempool entry.

Mitigation Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.3.0 or later immediately.

There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to ensure the node remains on the correct consensus path and is protected against malicious chain forks.

Resources Zebra 4.3.0 Release Announcement ZIP-244: Transaction Identifier

---

Other sources

ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. This would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1.

— MITRE

Affected Software

4 affected componentsFixes available
rust/zebra-consensus<5.0.1
5.0.1
rust/zebrad<4.3.0
4.3.0
zfnd Zebra Rust<4.3.0
zfnd Zebra-consensus Rust<5.0.1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade rust/zebra-consensus to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.0.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade rust/zebrad to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 4.3.0
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade Zebra to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 4.3.0
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade zebra-consensus to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.0.1

Event History

Mar 30, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·07:13 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·07:13 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
Mar 31, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·02:05 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·02:05 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·03:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·03:16 PM
Affected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-34377?

CVE-2026-34377 is considered a critical vulnerability due to its potential to cause a consensus split in the Zebra network.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-34377?

To mitigate CVE-2026-34377, update the Zebra software to version 5.0.1 or higher for zebra-consensus or version 4.3.0 or higher for zebrad.

3

What types of systems are affected by CVE-2026-34377?

CVE-2026-34377 affects systems running specific versions of the Zebra consensus software and the Zebrad software.

4

What are the potential impacts of CVE-2026-34377?

The potential impacts of CVE-2026-34377 include transaction validation errors and possible disruption to network consensus.

5

How was CVE-2026-34377 discovered?

CVE-2026-34377 was discovered due to a logic error in the transaction verification process within the Zebra software.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203