CVE-2026-35189: Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing

Published Sep 29, 2026
·
Updated

Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing

Other sources

Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points causes disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches X.509 extensions.

— Launchpad

Affected Software

11 affected componentsFixes available
OpenSSL OpenSSL
debian/openssl<=3.0.20-1~deb12u2, <=3.0.22-1~deb12u1, <=3.5.7-1~deb13u2, <=3.6.4-1
3.5.7-1~deb13u33.6.5-1
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=1.0.2<1.0.2zs
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=1.1.1<1.1.1zj
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=3.0.0<3.0.23
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=3.4.0<3.4.8
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=3.5.0<3.5.9
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=3.6.0<3.6.5
OpenSSL OpenSSL>=4.0.0<4.0.3
Microsoft azl3 openssl 3.3.7-6<3.3.7-7
3.3.7-7
Microsoft azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-20<20240524git3e722403cd16-21
20240524git3e722403cd16-21

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade debian/openssl to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.5.7-1~deb13u3Fixed in 3.6.5-1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.3.7-7
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 20240524git3e722403cd16-21

Event History

Sep 29, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:32 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:32 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:17 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Oct 3, 2026
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:17 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which TLS deployments are exposed to this issue?

Clients that receive certificates from malicious peers are exposed. Servers are also exposed when they solicit and process client certificates during TLS handshakes.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit the issue?

The attacker needs to present a crafted certificate containing many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points. The certificate can remain within the approximately 100 KiB peer-certificate size limit while causing several hundred MiB of resident-memory allocation.

3

How can the impact be amplified?

Multiple concurrent TLS connections presenting similarly crafted certificates can produce similarly large allocations. This can create enough memory pressure to crash an affected client or server.

4

Does this affect the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary?

No. The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203