CVE-2026-41684: Incus: Nil Dereferences on Restore via Malformed YAML

Published May 4, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Details It was found that backup.GetInfo() trusts the inline backup/index.yaml config when present and only falls back to parsing the legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file if result.Config == nil. As a result, an archive can carry a valid inline config that passes the initial import preflight while also carrying a malformed legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file that is reparsed later from the restored file system.

ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML documents with no container section, and multiple downstream consumers then dereference .Container without checking for nil. Confirmed examples in the instance restore and import flow include backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup().

An authenticated user with permission to import instance backups may be able to crash the Incus daemon with a crafted backup archive whose inline backup/index.yaml is valid but whose extracted legacy backup.yaml omits container. The crash occurs in the restore path after archive extraction has begun.

The flow is as follows: A crafted backup archive contains a valid backup/index.yaml file together with a malformed backup/container/backup.yaml file that omits the container section. backup.GetInfo() parses backup/index.yaml successfully, so bInfo.Config is populated from the inline config. Because result.Config != nil, GetInfo() does not fall back to backup/container/backup.yaml. instancespost.go then builds the request from bInfo.Config.Container, which succeeds because the inline config is valid. Later, storage unpack extracts backup/container/backup.yaml into the instance volume as <mountPath>/backup.yaml. backend.go then calls backup.UpdateInstanceConfig(..., mountPath), which reparses <mountPath>/backup.yaml through ParseConfigYamlFile(). Because ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML with no container section, backup.Container == nil, and later access to backup.Container.Devices or backup.Container.ExpandedDevices can trigger a nil-pointer dereference.

Affected Files: - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backupinfo.go#L87 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backupinfo.go#L115 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backupconfigutils.go#L85 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backupconfigutils.go#L159 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/storage/backend.go#L809 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/cmd/incusd/apiinternal.go#L749

The initial backup-metadata parser prefers inline backup/index.yaml content:

Affected Code: if hdr.Name == backupIndexPath { err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result)

The legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file is only parsed if the inline config is absent:

Affected Code: if result.Config == nil && hdr.Name == "backup/container/backup.yaml" { err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result.Config)

ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts an empty YAML document, or one with no container section, without validation:

Affected Code: func ParseConfigYamlFile(path string) (config.Config, error) { data, err := os.ReadFile(path) ... backupConf := config.Config{} err = yaml.Unmarshal(data, &backupConf)

UpdateInstanceConfig() conditionally uses backup.Container at first but later dereferences it unconditionally:

Affected Code: if backup.Container != nil { backup.Container.Name = b.Name backup.Container.Project = b.Project }

if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.Devices, pool.Name) { rootDiskDeviceFound = true }

if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.ExpandedDevices, pool.Name) { rootDiskDeviceFound = true }

Another confirmed sink is present in internalImportFromBackup():

Affected Code: if allowNameOverride { backupConf.Container.Name = instName }

if instName != backupConf.Container.Name { return fmt.Errorf("Instance name requested %q doesn't match instance name in backup config %q", instName, backupConf.Container.Name) }

This was confirmed as follows:

Command: go test ./test/fuzz -run='TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference' -count=1 -v

Output:

=== RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacybackupempty extractedbackupyamlpoctest.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacybackuppoolonly extractedbackupyamlpoctest.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacybackupvolumeonly extractedbackupyamlpoctest.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference --- FAIL: TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference (0.21s) FAIL

It is recommended to validate the parsed legacy backup.yaml structure before any dereference and to fail with a standard error if Container is missing:

Proposed Fix: if backup.Container == nil { return errors.New("No container struct in the backup file found") }

That validation should be added at minimum in: backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup() before any backupConf.Container. access

More broadly, it is recommended to centralize backup-config validation so that both inline backup/index.yaml and extracted legacy backup.yaml files are checked against the same structural requirements before any restore or import consumer uses them.

A patch is available at https://github.com/lxc/incus/releases/tag/v7.0.0.

Credit This issue was discovered and reported by the team at 7asecurity (https://7asecurity.com/)

Other sources

Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.0.0, backup.GetInfo() trusts the inline backup/index.yaml config when present and only falls back to parsing the legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file if result.Config == nil. As a result, an archive can carry a valid inline config that passes the initial import preflight while also carrying a malformed legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file that is reparsed later from the restored file system. ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML documents with no container section, and multiple downstream consumers then dereference. Container without checking for nil. Confirmed examples in the instance restore and import flow include backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup(). An authenticated user with permission to import instance backups may be able to crash the Incus daemon with a crafted backup archive whose inline backup/index.yaml is valid but whose extracted legacy backup.yaml omits container. The crash occurs in the restore path after archive extraction has begun. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.0.

MITRE

Affected Software

2 affected components
go/github.com/lxc/incus/v6/cmd/incusd<=6.23.0
linuxcontainers Incus<7.0.0

Event History

May 4, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·07:45 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·07:45 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
May 7, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·01:08 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·01:08 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·02:16 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-41684?

CVE-2026-41684 has been classified with a medium severity level due to its potential impact on data integrity in backup configurations.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-41684?

To remediate CVE-2026-41684, update to version 7.0.0 or later of the affected software to ensure proper validation of backup configurations.

3

Which software versions are affected by CVE-2026-41684?

CVE-2026-41684 affects versions up to and including 6.23.0 of the incus software package.

4

What impact does CVE-2026-41684 have on my system?

CVE-2026-41684 may allow an attacker to manipulate backup configurations, potentially leading to data corruption or loss.

5

Is there a workaround for CVE-2026-41684?

As of now, upgrading to the patched version is the recommended solution since no official workaround is provided.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203