CVE-2026-42790: nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in public_key hostname verification

Published May 27, 2026
·
Updated

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP publickey (pubkeycert and publickey modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification.

Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com):

First, pubkeycert:validatenames/6 in lib/publickey/src/pubkeycert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName.

Second, publickey:pkixverifyhostname/3 in lib/publickey/src/publickey.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkixverifyhostnamematchfun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback.

The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verifypeer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 26.2.5.21, 27.3.4.12, 28.5.0.1, and 29.0.1 corresponding to publickey from 1.4 before 1.15.1.7, 1.17.1.3, 1.20.3.1, and 1.21.1.

Other sources

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP publickey (pubkeycert and publickey modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification.

Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com):

First, pubkeycert:validatenames/6 in lib/publickey/src/pubkeycert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName.

Second, publickey:pkixverifyhostname/3 in lib/publickey/src/publickey.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkixverifyhostnamematchfun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback.

The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verifypeer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 29.0.1, OTP 28.5.0.1, OTP 27.3.4.12 and OTP 26.2.5.21, corresponding to publickey from 1.4 before 1.21.1, 1.20.3.1, 1.17.1.3 and 1.15.1.7.

MITRE

nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in publickey hostname verification

Microsoft

Affected Software

7 affected componentsFixes available
Erlang OTP>=19.3<26.2.5.21, >=19.3<27.3.4.12, >=19.3<28.5.0.1, >=19.3<29.0.1
Erlang public_key>=1.4<1.15.1.7, >=1.4<1.17.1.3, >=1.4<1.20.3.1, >=1.4<1.21.1
Erlang Erlang\/otp>=19.3<26.2.5.21
Erlang Erlang\/otp>=27.0<27.3.4.12
Erlang Erlang\/otp>=28.0<28.5.0.1
Erlang Erlang\/otp>=29.0<29.0.1
Microsoft azl3 erlang 26.2.5.20-1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP public_key (public_key) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.15.1.7
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modules to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 26.2.5.21
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP public_key (public_key) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.17.1.3
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modules to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 27.3.4.12
  5. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP public_key (public_key) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.20.3.1
  6. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modules to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 28.5.0.1
  7. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP public_key (public_key) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.21.1
  8. Upgrade

    Upgrade Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modules to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 29.0.1

Event History

May 27, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:09 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:09 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·05:03 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Data Sourced
via NVD·05:16 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
May 31, 2026
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:01 AM
DescriptionSeverity
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-42790?

CVE-2026-42790 has a high severity score of 7.6 on the CVSS scale.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-42790?

To fix CVE-2026-42790, update Erlang OTP and its public_key module to the latest version that addresses the vulnerability.

3

What are the risks associated with CVE-2026-42790?

CVE-2026-42790 could allow an attacker to bypass DNS name constraints, potentially leading to unauthorized access during TLS hostname verification.

4

Which software is affected by CVE-2026-42790?

CVE-2026-42790 affects Erlang OTP and its public_key module.

5

What kind of vulnerability is CVE-2026-42790?

CVE-2026-42790 is an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that impacts the security of TLS hostname verification.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203