CVE-2026-42790: nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in public_key hostname verification
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP publickey (pubkeycert and publickey modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification.
Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com):
First, pubkeycert:validatenames/6 in lib/publickey/src/pubkeycert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName.
Second, publickey:pkixverifyhostname/3 in lib/publickey/src/publickey.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkixverifyhostnamematchfun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback.
The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verifypeer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 26.2.5.21, 27.3.4.12, 28.5.0.1, and 29.0.1 corresponding to publickey from 1.4 before 1.15.1.7, 1.17.1.3, 1.20.3.1, and 1.21.1.
Other sources
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP publickey (pubkeycert and publickey modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification.
Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com):
First, pubkeycert:validatenames/6 in lib/publickey/src/pubkeycert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName.
Second, publickey:pkixverifyhostname/3 in lib/publickey/src/publickey.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkixverifyhostnamematchfun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback.
The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verifypeer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 29.0.1, OTP 28.5.0.1, OTP 27.3.4.12 and OTP 26.2.5.21, corresponding to publickey from 1.4 before 1.21.1, 1.20.3.1, 1.17.1.3 and 1.15.1.7.
— MITRE
nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in publickey hostname verification
— Microsoft
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP public_key (public_key)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.15.1.7 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modulesto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 26.2.5.21 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP public_key (public_key)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.17.1.3 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modulesto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 27.3.4.12 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP public_key (public_key)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.20.3.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modulesto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 28.5.0.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP public_key (public_key)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.21.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Erlang OTP (OTP) public_key via public_key modulesto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 29.0.1
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-42790?
CVE-2026-42790 has a high severity score of 7.6 on the CVSS scale.
How do I fix CVE-2026-42790?
To fix CVE-2026-42790, update Erlang OTP and its public_key module to the latest version that addresses the vulnerability.
What are the risks associated with CVE-2026-42790?
CVE-2026-42790 could allow an attacker to bypass DNS name constraints, potentially leading to unauthorized access during TLS hostname verification.
Which software is affected by CVE-2026-42790?
CVE-2026-42790 affects Erlang OTP and its public_key module.
What kind of vulnerability is CVE-2026-42790?
CVE-2026-42790 is an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that impacts the security of TLS hostname verification.