CVE-2026-43118: btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay
When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0. This is to signal during log replay (in overwriteitem()), that we should not set the isize since we only logged that an inode exists, so the isize of the inode in the subvolume tree must be preserved (as when we log new names or that an inode exists, we don't log extents).
This works fine except when we have already logged an inode in full mode or it's the first time we are logging an inode created in a past transaction, that inode has a new isize of 0 and then we log a new name for the inode (due to a new hardlink or a rename), in which case we log an isize of 0 for the inode and a generation of 0, which causes the log replay code to not update the inode's isize to 0 (in overwriteitem()).
An example scenario:
mkdir /mnt/dir xfsio -f -c "pwrite 0 64K" /mnt/dir/foo
sync
xfsio -c "truncate 0" -c "fsync" /mnt/dir/foo
ln /mnt/dir/foo /mnt/dir/bar
xfsio -c "fsync" /mnt/dir
<power fail>
After log replay the file remains with a size of 64K. This is because when we first log the inode, when we fsync file foo, we log its current isize of 0, and then when we create a hard link we log again the inode in exists mode (LOGINODEEXISTS) but we set a generation of 0 for the inode item we add to the log tree, so during log replay overwriteitem() sees that the generation is 0 and isize is 0 so we skip updating the inode's isize from 64K to 0.
Fix this by making sure at fillinodeitem() we always log the real generation of the inode if it was logged in the current transaction with the isize we logged before. Also if an inode created in a previous transaction is logged in exists mode only, make sure we log the isize stored in the inode item located from the commit root, so that if we log multiple times that the inode exists we get the correct isize.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Affected Software
Remediation
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-43118?
CVE-2026-43118 has been rated as a low severity vulnerability affecting btrfs in the Linux kernel.
How do I fix CVE-2026-43118?
To resolve CVE-2026-43118, you should update to the latest version of the Linux kernel that includes the fix.
What does CVE-2026-43118 affect?
CVE-2026-43118 affects the btrfs filesystem implementation in the Linux kernel.
Is CVE-2026-43118 exploitable?
CVE-2026-43118 is not expected to be exploitable in practical scenarios but may lead to filesystem anomalies.
Which versions of the Linux kernel are affected by CVE-2026-43118?
Versions of the Linux kernel from 2.6.30 to 6.19 and 7.0-rc1 to 7.0-rc5 are affected by CVE-2026-43118.