CVE-2026-44321: free5GC: SMF UPI POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks exits the SMF process on overlapping UE pools (unauthenticated, reachable Fatalf)
Summary free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without inbound OAuth2 middleware (same root cause as free5gc/free5gc#887). The POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks create-or-update handler accepts attacker-controlled JSON and passes it directly into UpNodesFromConfiguration(), which calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on several validation failures. One confirmed path is the UE-IP-pool overlap check: a single unauthenticated POST that adds a new UPF whose pool overlaps an existing UPF terminates the entire SMF process (docker ps shows Exited (1)), not just the goroutine. This is a stronger sink than free5gc/free5gc#905: that one panics inside the request goroutine and Gin recovers; this one calls Fatalf which is os.Exit(1)-equivalent and kills the whole SMF process, dropping all of SMF's SBI surface (PDU-session establishment, UE policy lookups, etc.) until the process is restarted.
Details Validated against the SMF container in the official Docker compose lab. - Source repo tag: v4.2.1 - Running Docker image: free5gc/smf:v4.2.1 - Runtime SMF commit: 8385c00a - Docker validation date: 2026-03-22 local (container log timestamp 2026-03-21T23:47:07Z) - SMF endpoint: http://10.100.200.6:8000
The broader UPI auth gap (#887) lets the unauthenticated POST reach the create/update handler. From there:
Vulnerable handler dispatches into topology parsing: POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks -> UpNodesFromConfiguration() -> isOverlap(allUEIPPools) -> logger.InitLog.Fatalf("overlap cidr value between UPFs")
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/smf): - UPI group mounted WITHOUT auth middleware (preconditions for unauthenticated reachability): - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:76 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:78 - Create-or-update handler accepts attacker JSON and forwards it to UpNodesFromConfiguration(): - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/apiupi.go:60 - NFs/smf/internal/sbi/apiupi.go:72 - Pool parsing (input from attacker JSON): - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:413 - Overlap check that calls Fatalf: - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:479
The same unauthenticated POST path also reaches sibling Fatalf calls for invalid-pool and static-pool-exclusion failures, so this is not a one-off code smell -- it is a class of attacker-reachable Fatalf call sites on a single unauthenticated handler: - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:416 - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:424 - NFs/smf/internal/context/userplaneinformation.go:430
PoC Reproduced end-to-end against the running SMF at http://10.100.200.6:8000.
1. Trigger: unauthenticated POST that adds a UPF with a UE pool overlapping the default UPF (10.60.0.0/16): curl -i -X POST http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"links":[{"A":"gNB1","B":"UPF-OVERLAP-20260322"}],"upNodes":{"UPF-OVERLAP-20260322":{"type":"UPF","nodeID":"198.51.100.20","addr":"198.51.100.20","sNssaiUpfInfos":[{"sNssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"dnnUpfInfoList":[{"dnn":"internet","pools":[{"cidr":"10.60.0.0/16"}]}]}]}}}'
Client-side observation (server died mid-request, no HTTP response written): curl: (52) Empty reply from server
2. Confirm the SMF container exited: docker ps -a --filter name=smf --format '{{.Names}}\t{{.Status}}' smf Exited (1) 9 seconds ago
3. SMF container logs (docker logs --tail 80 smf) show the FATA line that terminated the process: [FATA][SMF][Init] overlap cidr value between UPFs
Impact Unauthenticated process-kill DoS on the SMF management plane.
1. Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the UPI route group makes the trigger reachable to any off-path network attacker who can reach SMF on the SBI -- no token, no UE state needed. The same-instance nsmf-oam returning 401 (see free5gc/free5gc#887) proves OAuth middleware is wired in for other SMF route groups and only missing on UPI. 2. Reachable assertion / fail-fast (CWE-617): topology parsing calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on attacker-influenced validation failures. Fatalf is os.Exit(1)-equivalent -- it skips Gin's recovery, the deferred handlers, and kills the whole SMF process. This is materially worse than the related panic-DoS in free5gc/free5gc#905, which Gin recovers from at the goroutine level.
Any party that can reach SMF on the SBI can: - Send one unauthenticated POST with an overlapping UE pool and immediately terminate the SMF process, dropping all of SMF's SBI surface (PDU-session establishment, UE policy interactions) until SMF is restarted. - Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage. - Use sibling Fatalf paths (invalid-pool, static-pool exclusion) to sustain the same DoS even if the overlap check is hardened in isolation, because the underlying defect is using Fatalf for request-time validation on an unauthenticated handler.
No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no data to the attacker). No persistent Integrity impact (the topology updates are in-memory and are lost when SMF dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of SMF service via a single unauthenticated request.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/906 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/smf/pull/203
Other sources
free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without inbound OAuth2 middleware. The POST /upi/v1/upNodesLinks create-or-update handler accepts attacker-controlled JSON and passes it directly into UpNodesFromConfiguration(), which calls logger.InitLog.Fatalf(...) on several validation failures. One confirmed path is the UE-IP-pool overlap check: a single unauthenticated POST that adds a new UPF whose pool overlaps an existing UPF terminates the entire SMF process (docker ps shows Exited (1)), not just the goroutine. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.2.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Patch Available
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-44321?
CVE-2026-44321 is considered a significant security vulnerability due to its potential for remote code execution and data compromise.
How do I fix CVE-2026-44321?
To mitigate CVE-2026-44321, upgrade the free5GC SMF to version 1.4.4 or later where the vulnerability has been addressed.
What software is affected by CVE-2026-44321?
CVE-2026-44321 affects free5GC's SMF package versions up to and including 1.4.3.
How does CVE-2026-44321 impact system security?
CVE-2026-44321 can allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands or manipulate system configurations, compromising overall system security.
What are the consequences of not addressing CVE-2026-44321?
Failure to address CVE-2026-44321 could result in unauthorized access to sensitive data and exploitation of the affected system.