CVE-2026-46456: Apache Camel: Camel-AWS2-SQS: Inbound message attributes are mapped into the Exchange without an inbound HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing a message sender to inject Camel control headers
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel AWS2-SQS Component.
The camel-aws2-sqs component map inbound message attributes into the Camel Exchange through a component-specific HeaderFilterStrategy. Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy configured only an outbound filter (setOutFilterPattern, which blocks Camel, breadcrumbId and org.apache.camel. headers being written to the broker) but did not configure an inbound filter. As a result, when Sqs2Consumer copies each SQS MessageAttribute into the Exchange via HeaderFilterStrategy.applyFilterToExternalHeaders, DefaultHeaderFilterStrategy applied no inbound rule and treated every header name as not filtered - including Camel-internal control headers such as CamelHttpUri, CamelFileName or CamelSqlQuery - copying them unmodified onto the Camel message. Any principal able to send messages to the consumed SQS queue (for example a cross-account sender or a lower-privileged in-account component holding sqs:SendMessage) could therefore set arbitrary Camel control headers that influence the behaviour of downstream producers in the route (for example redirecting an HTTP producer, changing a file name, or overriding a query); the injected headers also persist across internal direct, seda and vm hops. The concrete downstream impact depends on which producers the route uses.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix adds an inbound HeaderFilterStrategy rule to Sqs2HeaderFilterStrategy that filters the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so sender-supplied Camel / camel headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from inbound messages before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel') and removeHeaders('camel') at the start of the route), and restrict who may send to the consumed SQS queue by applying least-privilege sqs:SendMessage permissions on the queue resource policy.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Camel (camel-aws2-sqs component)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.14.8 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Camel (camel-aws2-sqs component)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.18.3 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Apache Camel (camel-aws2-sqs component)to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.21.0 - Configuration
For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip sender-controlled Camel control headers by adding removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route before any downstream producer is invoked.
Apache Camel route removeHeaders at route start = removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') - Compensating control
Restrict who may send to the consumed SQS queue by applying least-privilege sqs:SendMessage permissions on the queue resource policy, so only trusted principals can send messages to the queue.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-46456?
CVE-2026-46456 has a risk rating of 28.
How do I fix CVE-2026-46456?
To fix CVE-2026-46456, you should implement an inbound HeaderFilterStrategy in the camel-aws2-sqs component.
What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-46456?
CVE-2026-46456 is classified as an Improper Input Validation vulnerability.
What software is affected by CVE-2026-46456?
CVE-2026-46456 affects the Apache Camel AWS2-SQS component.
What are the implications of CVE-2026-46456?
The implications of CVE-2026-46456 include the potential for message senders to inject Camel control headers into the exchange.