CVE-2026-46479: Flowise: Evaluation create+update mass-assignment allows cross-workspace evaluation takeover

Published May 14, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Type: Mass assignment via Object.assign(entity, body) -> client-controlled workspaceId (and on create, id) overwritten on the Evaluation entity -> cross-workspace data takeover and IDOR. File: packages/server/src/services/evaluations/index.ts Root cause: The Evaluation controller/service constructs a new Evaluation() and copies the request body into it via Object.assign(...) without an explicit field allowlist. The request body therefore can include workspaceId, id, createdDate, updatedDate. The server only rebinds some of these after the assign (e.g. on create, it overwrites workspaceId but not id; on update, it overwrites id but not workspaceId). The remaining client-controlled values land directly on the persisted row, breaking workspace isolation. Same root pattern as the evaluation entity's sibling controllers and as DocumentStore before it was patched in commit 840d2ae.

Affected Code

File: packages/server/src/services/evaluations/index.ts

ts // at line 69 Object.assign(newEvaluation, body) // <-- BUG: body.id, body.workspaceId, body.createdDate, body.updatedDate accepted

Why it's wrong: Object.assign(target, source) copies every own enumerable property of source onto target. The TypeORM/SQL persistence layer below it does not strip ownership-bearing columns, so workspaceId set in the request body lands as the new workspaceId of the persisted row. The DocumentStore patch (commit 840d2ae) demonstrated the intended fix shape (explicit field-by-field allowlist) but it has not been applied to this entity.

Exploit Chain

1. Attacker is an authenticated member of workspace A. They have a session cookie / JWT for the Flowise web UI. State at this point: attacker can read and write entities scoped to workspace A. 2. Attacker creates a evaluation in workspace A via the documented API (or reuses an existing one they own). They note its entity id. 3. Attacker issues a PUT /api/v1/evaluations/<id> (or equivalent endpoint) with a JSON body that includes "workspaceId": "<workspace-B-id>" (an arbitrary other workspace's UUID). State at this point: the request reaches the controller as a workspace-A authenticated request. 4. The controller calls Object.assign(updateEntity, body). The body's workspaceId overwrites the entity's workspaceId field. The persistence layer commits the row. 5. Final state: the evaluation row is now owned by workspace B. Workspace B members can see it, modify it, and use it. Workspace A loses access (it no longer satisfies their workspace filter). The original creator's workspace audit shows nothing because the operation looked like a normal update.

Security Impact

Severity: High. Cross-workspace boundary violation by any authenticated workspace member. Attacker capability: Any authenticated user with permission to update a evaluation can move it to any workspace whose UUID they can guess or enumerate (workspace UUIDs are exposed in many API responses, so enumeration is trivial). Evaluation runs (which may include captured prompts, model outputs, scoring data) can be moved cross-workspace via workspaceId overwrite, exposing the data to attacker workspace members. Preconditions: Authenticated session with edit permission for the source evaluation. No second factor required. Workspace UUIDs are exposed via the /api/v1/workspaces listing or via any cross-referenced object's workspaceId field, so target enumeration is trivial. Differential: PoC-verified by source inspection of the original GHSA-q4pr-4r26-c69r. Patched build (with the suggested fix below) refuses the workspaceId field; vulnerable build accepts it and persists it.

Suggested Fix

Already fixed in PR https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/6050 (allowlist pattern applied).

ts // Allowlist pattern (matches commit 840d2ae for DocumentStore): const updatedEvaluation = new Evaluation() if (body.<allowedfield1> !== undefined) updatedEvaluation.<allowedfield1> = body.<allowedfield1> if (body.<allowedfield2> !== undefined) updatedEvaluation.<allowedfield2> = body.<allowedfield2> // ...whitelist only the documented fields. Never copy id, workspaceId, createdDate, updatedDate from the client.

Regression tests should assert that a request body containing workspaceId, id, createdDate, or updatedDate is rejected (or at minimum: does not change those columns on the persisted row) for both create and update paths.

Other sources

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, evaluation create and update mass-assignment allows cross-workspace evaluation takeover. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.2.

MITRE

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
npm/flowise<=3.1.1
3.1.2
FlowiseAI Flowise<3.1.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/flowise to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.1.2
  2. Configuration

    Replace Object.assign(newEvaluation, body) with an explicit field-by-field allowlist: construct a new Evaluation() and set only documented/allowed fields (e.g. if (body.<allowed_field> !== undefined) newEvaluation.<allowed_field> = body.<allowed_field>). Never copy id, workspaceId, createdDate, or updatedDate from the client.

    packages/server/src/services/evaluations/index.ts object assignment allowlist = use explicit allowlist; do not copy id, workspaceId, createdDate, updatedDate from client input
  3. Operational

    Add regression tests asserting that a request body containing workspaceId, id, createdDate, or updatedDate is rejected (or at minimum does not change those columns) for both create and update API paths so mass-assignment of ownership fields cannot occur.

Event History

May 14, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·04:19 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·04:19 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
Jun 8, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:32 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:32 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-46479?

The severity of CVE-2026-46479 is rated high with a CVSS score of 7.7.

2

What type of vulnerability is described in CVE-2026-46479?

CVE-2026-46479 describes a mass assignment vulnerability that allows for cross-workspace evaluation takeover.

3

How can I fix CVE-2026-46479?

To fix CVE-2026-46479, ensure validation of the input data and prevent client-controlled fields from being overwritten during the evaluation creation and update process.

4

What software is affected by CVE-2026-46479?

CVE-2026-46479 affects the Flowise software package implemented via npm.

5

What risk is associated with CVE-2026-46479?

CVE-2026-46479 poses a risk level of 79, indicating significant concern due to potential data exposure and integrity issues.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203